These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29050180)
41. Alignment and component position after patient-matched instrumentation versus conventional total knee arthroplasty. Pourgiezis N; Reddy SP; Nankivell M; Morrison G; VanEssen J J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2016 Aug; 24(2):170-4. PubMed ID: 27574257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. [Clinical effects of robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty compared with traditional surgery: a Meta-analysis]. Zhang GH; Li K; Zhao B; Zhang YW; Wang Y; Zhang ZL Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2019 Sep; 32(9):846-852. PubMed ID: 31615184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Computer-assisted stereotaxic navigation improves the accuracy of mechanical alignment and component positioning in total knee arthroplasty. Liow MH; Goh GS; Pang HN; Tay DK; Lo NN; Yeo SJ Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2016 Aug; 136(8):1173-80. PubMed ID: 27349233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: simpler, faster and more accurate than standard instrumentation-a randomized controlled trial. Vide J; Freitas TP; Ramos A; Cruz H; Sousa JP Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Aug; 25(8):2616-2621. PubMed ID: 26585908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. [Clinical and radiographic outcomes of navigation-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty]. Li X; Yu J; Gong Y; Ren K; Liu J Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2015 Apr; 95(15):1162-7. PubMed ID: 26081361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. No demonstrable benefit for coronal alignment outcomes in PSI knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Mannan A; Smith TO; Sagar C; London NJ; Molitor PJ Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2015 Jun; 101(4):461-8. PubMed ID: 25802069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Efficacy of Patient-Specific Instruments in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Thienpont E; Schwab PE; Fennema P J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 Mar; 99(6):521-530. PubMed ID: 28291186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Systematic review of patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: new but not improved. Sassoon A; Nam D; Nunley R; Barrack R Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jan; 473(1):151-8. PubMed ID: 25059850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a controlled cadaver study using multiparameter quantitative three-dimensional CT assessment of alignment. Moon YW; Ha CW; Do KH; Kim CY; Han JH; Na SE; Lee CH; Kim JG; Park YS Comput Aided Surg; 2012; 17(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 22348661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Novel alignment measurement technique for total knee arthroplasty using patient specific instrumentation. Yamamura K; Minoda Y; Mizokawa S; Ohta Y; Sugama R; Nakamura S; Ueyama H; Nakamura H Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2017 Mar; 137(3):401-407. PubMed ID: 28097422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Patient-specific instrumentation development in TKA: 1st and 2nd generation designs in comparison with conventional instrumentation. Kwon OR; Kang KT; Son J; Suh DS; Heo DB; Koh YG Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2017 Jan; 137(1):111-118. PubMed ID: 28005167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Patient-specific instruments do not show advantage over conventional instruments in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at 2 year follow-up: a prospective, two-centre, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial. Leenders AM; Kort NP; Koenraadt KLM; van Geenen RCI; Most J; Kerens B; Boonen B; Schotanus MGM Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2022 Mar; 30(3):918-927. PubMed ID: 33570699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Computer-assisted techniques versus conventional guides for component alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Blakeney WG; Khan RJ; Wall SJ J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Aug; 93(15):1377-84. PubMed ID: 21915542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. A comparison of patient-specific and conventional instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Abane L; Anract P; Boisgard S; Descamps S; Courpied JP; Hamadouche M Bone Joint J; 2015 Jan; 97-B(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 25568414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Minimum 5-Year Outcomes of a Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Control Trial Assessing Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Patient-Specific Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty. Hampton MJ; Blakey CM; Anderson AA; Tomouk WM; Buckley SC; Hamer AJ; Sutton PM J Arthroplasty; 2022 Aug; 37(8):1579-1585. PubMed ID: 35077818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Does Patient-Specific Instrumentation Improve Femoral and Tibial Component Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Prospective Randomized Study. Stolarczyk A; Nagraba L; Mitek T; Stolarczyk M; Deszczyński JM; Jakucinski M Adv Exp Med Biol; 2018; 1096():11-17. PubMed ID: 29623574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Evaluation of the accuracy of patient-specific cutting blocks for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Cavaignac E; Pailhé R; Laumond G; Murgier J; Reina N; Laffosse JM; Bérard E; Chiron P Int Orthop; 2015 Aug; 39(8):1541-52. PubMed ID: 25300397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]