BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29050794)

  • 1. Genomic Quantitative Genetics to Study Evolution in the Wild.
    Gienapp P; Fior S; Guillaume F; Lasky JR; Sork VL; Csilléry K
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2017 Dec; 32(12):897-908. PubMed ID: 29050794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ecological genomics of natural plant populations: the Israeli perspective.
    Nevo E
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 513():321-44. PubMed ID: 19347652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Standing genetic variation as the predominant source for adaptation of a songbird.
    Lai YT; Yeung CKL; Omland KE; Pang EL; Hao Y; Liao BY; Cao HF; Zhang BW; Yeh CF; Hung CM; Hung HY; Yang MY; Liang W; Hsu YC; Yao CT; Dong L; Lin K; Li SH
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Feb; 116(6):2152-2157. PubMed ID: 30659151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Peril of Gene-Targeted Conservation.
    Kardos M; Shafer ABA
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2018 Nov; 33(11):827-839. PubMed ID: 30241778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting Responses to Contemporary Environmental Change Using Evolutionary Response Architectures.
    Bay RA; Rose N; Barrett R; Bernatchez L; Ghalambor CK; Lasky JR; Brem RB; Palumbi SR; Ralph P
    Am Nat; 2017 May; 189(5):463-473. PubMed ID: 28410032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Challenges and prospects in genome-wide quantitative trait loci mapping of standing genetic variation in natural populations.
    Schielzeth H; Husby A
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2014 Jul; 1320():35-57. PubMed ID: 24689944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [From population genetics to population genomics of forest trees: integrated population genomics approach].
    Krutovskiĭ KV
    Genetika; 2006 Oct; 42(10):1304-18. PubMed ID: 17152702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adaptive evolution in invasive species.
    Prentis PJ; Wilson JR; Dormontt EE; Richardson DM; Lowe AJ
    Trends Plant Sci; 2008 Jun; 13(6):288-94. PubMed ID: 18467157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Opinion: Is gene mapping in wild populations useful for understanding and predicting adaptation to global change?
    Gienapp P
    Glob Chang Biol; 2020 May; 26(5):2737-2749. PubMed ID: 32108978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Saving the spandrels? Adaptive genomic variation in conservation and fisheries management.
    Pearse DE
    J Fish Biol; 2016 Dec; 89(6):2697-2716. PubMed ID: 27723095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conservation genetics in transition to conservation genomics.
    Ouborg NJ; Pertoldi C; Loeschcke V; Bijlsma RK; Hedrick PW
    Trends Genet; 2010 Apr; 26(4):177-87. PubMed ID: 20227782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Population Genomics for Understanding Adaptation in Wild Plant Species.
    Weigel D; Nordborg M
    Annu Rev Genet; 2015; 49():315-38. PubMed ID: 26436459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genomics and the future of conservation genetics.
    Allendorf FW; Hohenlohe PA; Luikart G
    Nat Rev Genet; 2010 Oct; 11(10):697-709. PubMed ID: 20847747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genomic signature of natural and anthropogenic stress in wild populations of the waterflea Daphnia magna: validation in space, time and experimental evolution.
    Orsini L; Spanier KI; DE Meester L
    Mol Ecol; 2012 May; 21(9):2160-75. PubMed ID: 22257313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genomics and the challenging translation into conservation practice.
    Shafer AB; Wolf JB; Alves PC; Bergström L; Bruford MW; Brännström I; Colling G; Dalén L; De Meester L; Ekblom R; Fawcett KD; Fior S; Hajibabaei M; Hill JA; Hoezel AR; Höglund J; Jensen EL; Krause J; Kristensen TN; Krützen M; McKay JK; Norman AJ; Ogden R; Österling EM; Ouborg NJ; Piccolo J; Popović D; Primmer CR; Reed FA; Roumet M; Salmona J; Schenekar T; Schwartz MK; Segelbacher G; Senn H; Thaulow J; Valtonen M; Veale A; Vergeer P; Vijay N; Vilà C; Weissensteiner M; Wennerström L; Wheat CW; Zieliński P
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2015 Feb; 30(2):78-87. PubMed ID: 25534246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Genetics Underlying Natural Variation in the Biotic Interactions of Arabidopsis thaliana: The Challenges of Linking Evolutionary Genetics and Community Ecology.
    Roux F; Bergelson J
    Curr Top Dev Biol; 2016; 119():111-56. PubMed ID: 27282025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evolutionary Quantitative Genomics of Populus trichocarpa.
    Porth I; Klápště J; McKown AD; La Mantia J; Guy RD; Ingvarsson PK; Hamelin R; Mansfield SD; Ehlting J; Douglas CJ; El-Kassaby YA
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0142864. PubMed ID: 26599762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The relevance of pedigrees in the conservation genomics era.
    Galla SJ; Brown L; Couch-Lewis Ngāi Tahu Te Hapū O Ngāti Wheke Ngāti Waewae Y; Cubrinovska I; Eason D; Gooley RM; Hamilton JA; Heath JA; Hauser SS; Latch EK; Matocq MD; Richardson A; Wold JR; Hogg CJ; Santure AW; Steeves TE
    Mol Ecol; 2022 Jan; 31(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 34553796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. From the Past to the Future: Considering the Value and Limits of Evolutionary Prediction.
    Shaw RG
    Am Nat; 2019 Jan; 193(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 30624100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Natural history collections as windows on evolutionary processes.
    Holmes MW; Hammond TT; Wogan GO; Walsh RE; LaBarbera K; Wommack EA; Martins FM; Crawford JC; Mack KL; Bloch LM; Nachman MW
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Feb; 25(4):864-81. PubMed ID: 26757135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.