BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29050873)

  • 41. The in-the-crease inferior gluteal artery perforator flap for breast reconstruction.
    Allen RJ; Levine JL; Granzow JW
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Aug; 118(2):333-9. PubMed ID: 16874198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Anatomical basis of the lateral superior gluteal artery perforator (LSGAP) flap and role in bilateral breast reconstruction.
    Fade G; Gobel F; Pele E; Chaput B; Garrido I; Pinsolle V; Pelissier P; Sinna R
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Jun; 66(6):756-62. PubMed ID: 23523167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Sensory recovery in the sensate free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap.
    Yap LH; Whiten SC; Forster A; Stevenson HJ
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Apr; 115(5):1280-8. PubMed ID: 15809587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Breast reconstruction using the lateral femoral circumflex artery perforator flap.
    Kind GM; Foster RD
    J Reconstr Microsurg; 2011 Sep; 27(7):427-32. PubMed ID: 21766271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Emerging trends in microsurgical breast reconstruction: deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) and the superior gluteal artery perforator (SGAP) flaps.
    Howard MA; Mehrara B
    Int J Surg; 2005; 3(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 17462259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Myosonographic evaluation of rectus abdominis muscle function after DIEP flap breast reconstruction].
    Kässmann C; Peek A; Luxenhofer F; Scheufler O; Exner K
    Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2002 Nov; 34(6):386-94. PubMed ID: 12601605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Myosonographic study of abdominal wall dynamics to assess donor site morbidity after microsurgical breast reconstruction with a DIEP or an ms-2 TRAM flap.
    Seidenstuecker K; Legler U; Munder B; Andree C; Mahajan A; Witzel C
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2016 May; 69(5):598-603. PubMed ID: 27049776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Breast sensation after breast reconstruction: a systematic review.
    Shridharani SM; Magarakis M; Stapleton SM; Basdag B; Seal SM; Rosson GD
    J Reconstr Microsurg; 2010 Jul; 26(5):303-10. PubMed ID: 20195965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Breast reconstruction with gluteal artery perforator flaps.
    Granzow JW; Levine JL; Chiu ES; Allen RJ
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2006; 59(6):614-21. PubMed ID: 16716955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The sGAP flap: rare exception or second choice in autologous breast reconstruction?
    Baumeister S; Werdin F; Peek A
    J Reconstr Microsurg; 2010 May; 26(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 20169527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Breast reconstruction with profunda artery perforator flap: A prospective study of 30 consecutive cases].
    Haddad K; Hunsinger V; Obadia D; Hivelin M; Lantieri L
    Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 2016 Jun; 61(3):169-76. PubMed ID: 27016179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Is there a psychological and physiological difference between DIEP- and free TRAM-flap? A retrospective patient survey].
    Wurzer P; Spendel S; Kamolz LP; Parvizi D; Tuca A; Rappl T
    Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2014 Aug; 46(4):256-62. PubMed ID: 25162244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Fasciae latae perforator flap for breast reconstruction: An attractive alternative in case of DIEP contraindication].
    Lefèvre M; Sarfati B; Honart JF; Alkashnam H; Rimareix F; Leymarie N; Kolb F
    Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 2017 Feb; 62(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 27364909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Simultaneous bilateral breast reconstruction with superior gluteal artery perforator (SGAP) flaps.
    Guerra AB; Soueid N; Metzinger SE; Levine J; Bidros RS; Erhard H; Allen RJ
    Ann Plast Surg; 2004 Oct; 53(4):305-10. PubMed ID: 15385761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Tug 'O' war: challenges of transverse upper gracilis (TUG) myocutaneous free flap breast reconstruction.
    Locke MB; Zhong T; Mureau MA; Hofer SO
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2012 Aug; 65(8):1041-50. PubMed ID: 22410285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparison of donor-site complications and functional outcomes in free muscle-sparing TRAM flap and free DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
    Bajaj AK; Chevray PM; Chang DW
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Mar; 117(3):737-46; discussion 747-50. PubMed ID: 16525258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Donor-Site Morbidity and Quality of Life after Autologous Breast Reconstruction with PAP versus TMG Flap.
    Augustin A; Pülzl P; Morandi EM; Winkelmann S; Schoberleitner I; Brunner C; Ritter M; Bauer T; Wachter T; Wolfram D
    Curr Oncol; 2022 Aug; 29(8):5682-5697. PubMed ID: 36005186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Free flap breast reconstruction: the LSU experience (1984-1996).
    Allen R; Guarda H; Wall F; Dupin C; Glass C
    J La State Med Soc; 1997 Oct; 149(10):388-92. PubMed ID: 9347636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Outcomes of delayed abdominal-based autologous reconstruction versus latissimus dorsi flap plus implant reconstruction in previously irradiated patients.
    Levine SM; Patel N; Disa JJ
    Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Oct; 69(4):380-2. PubMed ID: 22964681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Choice of flaps for breast reconstruction.
    Tachi M; Yamada A
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2005 Oct; 10(5):289-97. PubMed ID: 16247654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.