These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
512 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29051107)
1. Advances in the GRADE approach to rate the certainty in estimates from a network meta-analysis. Brignardello-Petersen R; Bonner A; Alexander PE; Siemieniuk RA; Furukawa TA; Rochwerg B; Hazlewood GS; Alhazzani W; Mustafa RA; Murad MH; Puhan MA; Schünemann HJ; Guyatt GH; J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jan; 93():36-44. PubMed ID: 29051107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. GRADE approach to rate the certainty from a network meta-analysis: addressing incoherence. Brignardello-Petersen R; Mustafa RA; Siemieniuk RAC; Murad MH; Agoritsas T; Izcovich A; Schünemann HJ; Guyatt GH; J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Apr; 108():77-85. PubMed ID: 30529648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. GRADE concept 6: a novel application of external indirect evidence into GRADE ratings of evidence certainty in network meta-analysis. Hao Q; Gao Y; Zhao Y; Murad MH; Mustafa R; Ansari MT; Schünemann HJ; Rind DM; Brignardello-Petersen R; Guyatt G J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Nov; 163():95-101. PubMed ID: 37739191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. GRADE approach to rate the certainty from a network meta-analysis: avoiding spurious judgments of imprecision in sparse networks. Brignardello-Petersen R; Murad MH; Walter SD; McLeod S; Carrasco-Labra A; Rochwerg B; Schünemann HJ; Tomlinson G; Guyatt GH; J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jan; 105():60-67. PubMed ID: 30253217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How do network meta-analyses address intransitivity when assessing certainty of evidence: a systematic survey. Wang Y; Xia R; Pericic TP; Bekkering GE; Hou L; Bala MM; Gao Y; Wu M; Gloss D; Siemieniuk RA; Fei Y; Rochwerg B; Guyatt G; Brignardello-Petersen R BMJ Open; 2023 Nov; 13(11):e075212. PubMed ID: 38035750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Applying GRADE to a network meta-analysis of antidepressants led to more conservative conclusions. Bonner A; Alexander PE; Brignardello-Petersen R; Furukawa TA; Siemieniuk RA; Zhang Y; Wiercioch W; Florez ID; Fei Y; Agarwal A; Yepes-Nuñez JJ; Beyene J; Schünemann H; Guyatt GH J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Oct; 102():87-98. PubMed ID: 29800689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation concept article 5: addressing intransitivity in a network meta-analysis. Brignardello-Petersen R; Tomlinson G; Florez I; Rind DM; Chu D; Morgan R; Mustafa RA; Schünemann H; Guyatt GH; J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Aug; 160():151-159. PubMed ID: 37348573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. GRADE guidelines 33: Addressing imprecision in a network meta-analysis. Brignardello-Petersen R; Guyatt GH; Mustafa RA; Chu DK; Hultcrantz M; Schünemann HJ; Tomlinson G J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Nov; 139():49-56. PubMed ID: 34293434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. GRADE Guidelines 28: Use of GRADE for the assessment of evidence about prognostic factors: rating certainty in identification of groups of patients with different absolute risks. Foroutan F; Guyatt G; Zuk V; Vandvik PO; Alba AC; Mustafa R; Vernooij R; Arevalo-Rodriguez I; Munn Z; Roshanov P; Riley R; Schandelmaier S; Kuijpers T; Siemieniuk R; Canelo-Aybar C; Schunemann H; Iorio A J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 May; 121():62-70. PubMed ID: 31982539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rapid methods including network meta-analysis to produce evidence in clinical decision support: a decision analysis. Eiring Ø; Brurberg KG; Nytrøen K; Nylenna M Syst Rev; 2018 Oct; 7(1):168. PubMed ID: 30342549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. GRADE guidelines 32: GRADE offers guidance on choosing targets of GRADE certainty of evidence ratings. Zeng L; Brignardello-Petersen R; Hultcrantz M; Siemieniuk RAC; Santesso N; Traversy G; Izcovich A; Sadeghirad B; Alexander PE; Devji T; Rochwerg B; Murad MH; Morgan R; Christensen R; Schünemann HJ; Guyatt GH J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Sep; 137():163-175. PubMed ID: 33857619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An empirical comparison of Bayesian modelling strategies for missing binary outcome data in network meta-analysis. Spineli LM BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Apr; 19(1):86. PubMed ID: 31018836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Continuously updated network meta-analysis and statistical monitoring for timely decision-making. Nikolakopoulou A; Mavridis D; Egger M; Salanti G Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 May; 27(5):1312-1330. PubMed ID: 27587588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]