141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29051756)
1. Genomic GC-Content Affects the Accuracy of 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing Based Microbial Profiling due to PCR Bias.
Laursen MF; Dalgaard MD; Bahl MI
Front Microbiol; 2017; 8():1934. PubMed ID: 29051756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Corrigendum: Genomic GC-Content Affects the Accuracy of 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing Based Microbial Profiling due to PCR Bias.
Laursen MF; Dalgaard MD; Bahl MI
Front Microbiol; 2022; 13():878696. PubMed ID: 35369490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of 16S rRNA Gene Based Microbial Profiling Using Five Next-Generation Sequencers and Various Primers.
Park C; Kim SB; Choi SH; Kim S
Front Microbiol; 2021; 12():715500. PubMed ID: 34721319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance comparison of Illumina and ion torrent next-generation sequencing platforms for 16S rRNA-based bacterial community profiling.
Salipante SJ; Kawashima T; Rosenthal C; Hoogestraat DR; Cummings LA; Sengupta DJ; Harkins TT; Cookson BT; Hoffman NG
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2014 Dec; 80(24):7583-91. PubMed ID: 25261520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A novel ultra high-throughput 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing library preparation method for the Illumina HiSeq platform.
de Muinck EJ; Trosvik P; Gilfillan GD; Hov JR; Sundaram AYM
Microbiome; 2017 Jul; 5(1):68. PubMed ID: 28683838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 16S rRNA gene sequencing of mock microbial populations- impact of DNA extraction method, primer choice and sequencing platform.
Fouhy F; Clooney AG; Stanton C; Claesson MJ; Cotter PD
BMC Microbiol; 2016 Jun; 16(1):123. PubMed ID: 27342980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development of an Analysis Pipeline Characterizing Multiple Hypervariable Regions of 16S rRNA Using Mock Samples.
Barb JJ; Oler AJ; Kim HS; Chalmers N; Wallen GR; Cashion A; Munson PJ; Ames NJ
PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148047. PubMed ID: 26829716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of sequencing platforms and bioinformatics pipelines for compositional analysis of the gut microbiome.
Allali I; Arnold JW; Roach J; Cadenas MB; Butz N; Hassan HM; Koci M; Ballou A; Mendoza M; Ali R; Azcarate-Peril MA
BMC Microbiol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):194. PubMed ID: 28903732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of DNA extraction method and targeted 16S-rRNA hypervariable region on oral microbiota profiling.
Teng F; Darveekaran Nair SS; Zhu P; Li S; Huang S; Li X; Xu J; Yang F
Sci Rep; 2018 Nov; 8(1):16321. PubMed ID: 30397210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incorporation of Data From Multiple Hypervariable Regions when Analyzing Bacterial 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing Data.
Jones CB; White JR; Ernst SE; Sfanos KS; Peiffer LB
Front Genet; 2022; 13():799615. PubMed ID: 35432480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Species-level resolution of 16S rRNA gene amplicons sequenced through the MinION™ portable nanopore sequencer.
Benítez-Páez A; Portune KJ; Sanz Y
Gigascience; 2016; 5():4. PubMed ID: 26823973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An inter-laboratory study to investigate the impact of the bioinformatics component on microbiome analysis using mock communities.
O'Sullivan DM; Doyle RM; Temisak S; Redshaw N; Whale AS; Logan G; Huang J; Fischer N; Amos GCA; Preston MD; Marchesi JR; Wagner J; Parkhill J; Motro Y; Denise H; Finn RD; Harris KA; Kay GL; O'Grady J; Ransom-Jones E; Wu H; Laing E; Studholme DJ; Benavente ED; Phelan J; Clark TG; Moran-Gilad J; Huggett JF
Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):10590. PubMed ID: 34012005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of different hypervariable regions of 16S rRNA for taxonomic profiling of vaginal microbiota using next-generation sequencing.
Sirichoat A; Sankuntaw N; Engchanil C; Buppasiri P; Faksri K; Namwat W; Chantratita W; Lulitanond V
Arch Microbiol; 2021 Apr; 203(3):1159-1166. PubMed ID: 33221964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 16S rRNA gene sequencing on a benchtop sequencer: accuracy for identification of clinically important bacteria.
Watts GS; Youens-Clark K; Slepian MJ; Wolk DM; Oshiro MM; Metzger GS; Dhingra D; Cranmer LD; Hurwitz BL
J Appl Microbiol; 2017 Dec; 123(6):1584-1596. PubMed ID: 28940494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Primer, Pipelines, Parameters: Issues in 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing.
Abellan-Schneyder I; Matchado MS; Reitmeier S; Sommer A; Sewald Z; Baumbach J; List M; Neuhaus K
mSphere; 2021 Feb; 6(1):. PubMed ID: 33627512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comprehensive single-PCR 16S and 18S rRNA community analysis validated with mock communities, and estimation of sequencing bias against 18S.
Yeh YC; McNichol J; Needham DM; Fichot EB; Berdjeb L; Fuhrman JA
Environ Microbiol; 2021 Jun; 23(6):3240-3250. PubMed ID: 33938123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating Established Methods for Rumen 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing With Mock Microbial Populations.
McGovern E; Waters SM; Blackshields G; McCabe MS
Front Microbiol; 2018; 9():1365. PubMed ID: 29988486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comprehensive benchmarking study of protocols and sequencing platforms for 16S rRNA community profiling.
D'Amore R; Ijaz UZ; Schirmer M; Kenny JG; Gregory R; Darby AC; Shakya M; Podar M; Quince C; Hall N
BMC Genomics; 2016 Jan; 17():55. PubMed ID: 26763898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The truth about metagenomics: quantifying and counteracting bias in 16S rRNA studies.
Brooks JP; Edwards DJ; Harwich MD; Rivera MC; Fettweis JM; Serrano MG; Reris RA; Sheth NU; Huang B; Girerd P; ; Strauss JF; Jefferson KK; Buck GA
BMC Microbiol; 2015 Mar; 15():66. PubMed ID: 25880246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bioinformatic strategies to address limitations of 16rRNA short-read amplicons from different sequencing platforms.
Bailén M; Bressa C; Larrosa M; González-Soltero R
J Microbiol Methods; 2020 Feb; 169():105811. PubMed ID: 31857143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
