These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29052166)

  • 1. Is human classification by experienced untrained observers a gold standard in fixation detection?
    Hooge ITC; Niehorster DC; Nyström M; Andersson R; Hessels RS
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Oct; 50(5):1864-1881. PubMed ID: 29052166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Review and Evaluation of Eye Movement Event Detection Algorithms.
    Birawo B; Kasprowski P
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Nov; 22(22):. PubMed ID: 36433407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gaze-in-wild: A dataset for studying eye and head coordination in everyday activities.
    Kothari R; Yang Z; Kanan C; Bailey R; Pelz JB; Diaz GJ
    Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):2539. PubMed ID: 32054884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. gazeNet: End-to-end eye-movement event detection with deep neural networks.
    Zemblys R; Niehorster DC; Holmqvist K
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Apr; 51(2):840-864. PubMed ID: 30334148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors affecting inter-rater agreement in human classification of eye movements: a comparison of three datasets.
    Friedman L; Prokopenko V; Djanian S; Katrychuk D; Komogortsev OV
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Jan; 55(1):417-427. PubMed ID: 35411475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do you see what I see? Mobile eye-tracker contextual analysis and inter-rater reliability.
    Stuart S; Hunt D; Nell J; Godfrey A; Hausdorff JM; Rochester L; Alcock L
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2018 Feb; 56(2):289-296. PubMed ID: 28712014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. One algorithm to rule them all? An evaluation and discussion of ten eye movement event-detection algorithms.
    Andersson R; Larsson L; Holmqvist K; Stridh M; Nyström M
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Apr; 49(2):616-637. PubMed ID: 27193160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automated classification and scoring of smooth pursuit eye movements in the presence of fixations and saccades.
    Komogortsev OV; Karpov A
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Mar; 45(1):203-15. PubMed ID: 22806708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gazepath: An eye-tracking analysis tool that accounts for individual differences and data quality.
    van Renswoude DR; Raijmakers MEJ; Koornneef A; Johnson SP; Hunnius S; Visser I
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Apr; 50(2):834-852. PubMed ID: 28593606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Eye fixations of deaf and hearing observers in simultaneous communication perception.
    De Filippo CL; Lansing CR
    Ear Hear; 2006 Aug; 27(4):331-52. PubMed ID: 16825884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Head movement compensation and multi-modal event detection in eye-tracking data for unconstrained head movements.
    Larsson L; Schwaller A; Nyström M; Stridh M
    J Neurosci Methods; 2016 Dec; 274():13-26. PubMed ID: 27693470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gaze and Movement Assessment (GaMA): Inter-site validation of a visuomotor upper limb functional protocol.
    Williams HE; Chapman CS; Pilarski PM; Vette AH; Hebert JS
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0219333. PubMed ID: 31887218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fixation sequences made during visual examination of briefly presented 2D images.
    Mannan SK; Ruddock KH; Wooding DS
    Spat Vis; 1997; 11(2):157-78. PubMed ID: 9428094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. GraFIX: a semiautomatic approach for parsing low- and high-quality eye-tracking data.
    Saez de Urabain IR; Johnson MH; Smith TJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2015 Mar; 47(1):53-72. PubMed ID: 24671827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fixation classification: how to merge and select fixation candidates.
    Hooge ITC; Niehorster DC; Nyström M; Andersson R; Hessels RS
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Dec; 54(6):2765-2776. PubMed ID: 35023066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Errors of binocular fixation are common in normal subjects during natural conditions.
    Cornell ED; Macdougall HG; Predebon J; Curthoys IS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Nov; 80(11):764-71. PubMed ID: 14627944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What can entropy metrics tell us about the characteristics of ocular fixation trajectories?
    Melnyk K; Friedman L; Komogortsev OV
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(1):e0291823. PubMed ID: 38166054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using machine learning to detect events in eye-tracking data.
    Zemblys R; Niehorster DC; Komogortsev O; Holmqvist K
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Feb; 50(1):160-181. PubMed ID: 28233250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Saccadic eye movements are able to reduce body sway in mildly-affected people with Multiple Sclerosis.
    Santinelli FB; van Emmerik REA; Silva FA; Imaizumi LFI; Penedo T; Canzonieri AM; Rodrigues ST; Zago PFP; Barbieri FA
    Mult Scler Relat Disord; 2019 May; 30():63-68. PubMed ID: 30738874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measuring dwell time percentage from head-mounted eye-tracking data--comparison of a frame-by-frame and a fixation-by-fixation analysis.
    Vansteenkiste P; Cardon G; Philippaerts R; Lenoir M
    Ergonomics; 2015; 58(5):712-21. PubMed ID: 25529829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.