These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29053376)

  • 1. Eighth International Congress of Peer Review and Scientific Publication: Enhancing the Quality and Credibility of Science, Chicago, Illinois, September 10-12, 2017.
    Reiss CS
    DNA Cell Biol; 2017 Nov; 36(11):1039-1043. PubMed ID: 29053376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Illusionary Science?
    Schuberth JM
    Foot Ankle Spec; 2018 Feb; 11(1):15-16. PubMed ID: 29345203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The evolution of peer review as a basis for scientific publication: directional selection towards a robust discipline?
    Ferreira C; Bastille-Rousseau G; Bennett AM; Ellington EH; Terwissen C; Austin C; Borlestean A; Boudreau MR; Chan K; Forsythe A; Hossie TJ; Landolt K; Longhi J; Otis JA; Peers MJ; Rae J; Seguin J; Watt C; Wehtje M; Murray DL
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2016 Aug; 91(3):597-610. PubMed ID: 25865035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Open access: science and undeveloped countries, a reality of discrimination.
    Cardona-Maya W
    N Z Med J; 2009 Nov; 122(1306):128-9. PubMed ID: 20145695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ninth international congress on peer review and scientific publication: call for research.
    Ioannidis JPA; Berkwits M; Flanagin A; Godlee F; Bloom T
    BMJ; 2019 Sep; 366():l5475. PubMed ID: 31527134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The 2nd International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication. Proceedings. Chicago, Illinois, September 9-11, 1993.
    JAMA; 1994 Jul; 272(2):91-173. PubMed ID: 7912291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Changing ethical standards in scientific publication.
    Brand RA; Heckman JD; Scott J
    J Surg Orthop Adv; 2004; 13(3):137-8. PubMed ID: 15559688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scientific progress despite irreproducibility: A seeming paradox.
    Shiffrin RM; Börner K; Stigler SM
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Mar; 115(11):2632-2639. PubMed ID: 29531095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Guarding the guardians: research on editorial peer review. Selected proceedings from the First International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication. May 10-12, 1989, Chicago, Ill.
    JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1317-1441. PubMed ID: 2304208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. After all, that is "science"--the Fifth International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication, Chicago 2005.
    Habibzadeh F
    Croat Med J; 2005 Dec; 46(6):1003-4. PubMed ID: 16342360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictive factors for publication of abstracts at the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons Annual Scientific Congress.
    Udovicich C; Soh B; Law S; Hoe V; Lanfranco D; Perera K; Duong C; Chan S
    ANZ J Surg; 2018 Jan; 88(1-2):39-44. PubMed ID: 28707313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Guidelines on good publication practice.
    Committee on Public Ethics.
    J Postgrad Med; 2000; 46(3):217-21. PubMed ID: 11298477
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retraction blues.
    Nat Med; 2013 Dec; 19(12):1547-8. PubMed ID: 24309636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rigorous Peer Review is Worth the Effort.
    Kearney MH
    Res Nurs Health; 2016 Dec; 39(6):393-395. PubMed ID: 27740694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peer review in hematopoietic cell transplantation: are we doing our fair share?
    Giralt S; Korngold R; Lazarus HM
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 2016 Sep; 51(9):1159-62. PubMed ID: 27159173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Errors in science: the role of reviewers.
    Székely T; Krüger O; Krause ET
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2014 Jul; 29(7):371-3. PubMed ID: 24875588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Caveats for scientific publication in the modern marketplace.
    Will EJ
    Clin J Am Soc Nephrol; 2009 Nov; 4(11):1693-5. PubMed ID: 19850769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ranking games.
    Osterloh M; Frey BS
    Eval Rev; 2015 Feb; 39(1):102-29. PubMed ID: 25092865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ethics of reviewing scientific publications.
    Napolitani F; Petrini C; Garattini S
    Eur J Intern Med; 2017 May; 40():22-25. PubMed ID: 28038824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conflicts of interest in medical science: peer usage, peer review and 'CoI consultancy'.
    Charlton BG
    Med Hypotheses; 2004; 63(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 15236772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.