These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29053376)
1. Eighth International Congress of Peer Review and Scientific Publication: Enhancing the Quality and Credibility of Science, Chicago, Illinois, September 10-12, 2017. Reiss CS DNA Cell Biol; 2017 Nov; 36(11):1039-1043. PubMed ID: 29053376 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The evolution of peer review as a basis for scientific publication: directional selection towards a robust discipline? Ferreira C; Bastille-Rousseau G; Bennett AM; Ellington EH; Terwissen C; Austin C; Borlestean A; Boudreau MR; Chan K; Forsythe A; Hossie TJ; Landolt K; Longhi J; Otis JA; Peers MJ; Rae J; Seguin J; Watt C; Wehtje M; Murray DL Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2016 Aug; 91(3):597-610. PubMed ID: 25865035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Open access: science and undeveloped countries, a reality of discrimination. Cardona-Maya W N Z Med J; 2009 Nov; 122(1306):128-9. PubMed ID: 20145695 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Ninth international congress on peer review and scientific publication: call for research. Ioannidis JPA; Berkwits M; Flanagin A; Godlee F; Bloom T BMJ; 2019 Sep; 366():l5475. PubMed ID: 31527134 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The 2nd International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication. Proceedings. Chicago, Illinois, September 9-11, 1993. JAMA; 1994 Jul; 272(2):91-173. PubMed ID: 7912291 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Scientific progress despite irreproducibility: A seeming paradox. Shiffrin RM; Börner K; Stigler SM Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Mar; 115(11):2632-2639. PubMed ID: 29531095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Guarding the guardians: research on editorial peer review. Selected proceedings from the First International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication. May 10-12, 1989, Chicago, Ill. JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1317-1441. PubMed ID: 2304208 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. After all, that is "science"--the Fifth International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication, Chicago 2005. Habibzadeh F Croat Med J; 2005 Dec; 46(6):1003-4. PubMed ID: 16342360 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictive factors for publication of abstracts at the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons Annual Scientific Congress. Udovicich C; Soh B; Law S; Hoe V; Lanfranco D; Perera K; Duong C; Chan S ANZ J Surg; 2018 Jan; 88(1-2):39-44. PubMed ID: 28707313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Guidelines on good publication practice. Committee on Public Ethics. J Postgrad Med; 2000; 46(3):217-21. PubMed ID: 11298477 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Rigorous Peer Review is Worth the Effort. Kearney MH Res Nurs Health; 2016 Dec; 39(6):393-395. PubMed ID: 27740694 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Peer review in hematopoietic cell transplantation: are we doing our fair share? Giralt S; Korngold R; Lazarus HM Bone Marrow Transplant; 2016 Sep; 51(9):1159-62. PubMed ID: 27159173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Errors in science: the role of reviewers. Székely T; Krüger O; Krause ET Trends Ecol Evol; 2014 Jul; 29(7):371-3. PubMed ID: 24875588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Caveats for scientific publication in the modern marketplace. Will EJ Clin J Am Soc Nephrol; 2009 Nov; 4(11):1693-5. PubMed ID: 19850769 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]