These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Comparative study between mobile computed radiography and mobile flat-panel radiography for bedside chest radiography: impact of an antiscatter grid on the visibility of selected diagnostically relevant structures. Lehnert T; Naguib NN; Wutzler S; Bauer RW; Kerl JM; Burkhard T; Schulz B; Larson MC; Ackermann H; Vogl TJ; Balzer JO Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24019019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computed radiography versus mobile direct radiography for bedside chest radiographs: impact of dose on image quality and reader agreement. De Boo DW; Weber M; Deurloo EE; Streekstra GJ; Freling NJ; Dongelmans DA; Schaefer-Prokop CM Clin Radiol; 2011 Sep; 66(9):826-32. PubMed ID: 21570679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Support line and tube visibility in chest examinations using computed radiography. Huda W; Belden CJ; Webb LA; Palmer CK J Digit Imaging; 1997 Aug; 10(3):126-31. PubMed ID: 9268908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The future of bedside chest radiography: Comparative study of mobile flat-panels and needle-image plate storage phosphor systems]. Bremicker K; Gosch D; Kahn T; Borte G Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed; 2015 Nov; 110(8):603-8. PubMed ID: 25905891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs. Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Direct detector radiography versus dual reading computed radiography: feasibility of dose reduction in chest radiography. Gruber M; Uffmann M; Weber M; Prokop M; Balassy C; Schaefer-Prokop C Eur Radiol; 2006 Jul; 16(7):1544-50. PubMed ID: 16404566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Grids and high kilo-volt-peak-setting in bedside chest radiographic examinations. Grunert JH; Boy B; Busche D; Groenewold SK; Herrmann H; Krahn-Peters V; Maier J; Meier S; Penndorf-Wehner F; Störl C; Hendrickx P JBR-BTR; 2000 Dec; 83(6):296-9. PubMed ID: 11210681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Visibility of normal thoracic anatomic landmarks on storage phosphor digital radiography versus conventional radiography. Konen E; Greenberg I; Rozenman J Isr Med Assoc J; 2005 Aug; 7(8):495-7. PubMed ID: 16106773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Clinical application of FCR (Fuji Computed Radiography) for portable chest radiographs in the ICU]. Yamada K; Fujiwara T; Igari H; Matsui K; Ookoshi T; Odagiri K Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Aug; 49(8):993-8. PubMed ID: 2594489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Flat-panel-detector chest radiography: effect of tube voltage on image quality. Uffmann M; Neitzel U; Prokop M; Kabalan N; Weber M; Herold CJ; Schaefer-Prokop C Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):642-50. PubMed ID: 15858104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Feasibility of dose reduction using needle-structured image plates versus powder-structured plates for computed radiography of the knee. Gruber M; Weber M; Homolka P; Nemec S; Fruehwald-Pallamar J; Uffmann M AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Aug; 197(2):W318-23. PubMed ID: 21785059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital chest radiography with a selenium-based flat-panel detector versus a storage phosphor system: comparison of soft-copy images. Goo JM; Im JG; Kim JH; Seo JB; Kim TS; Shine SJ; Lee W AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Oct; 175(4):1013-8. PubMed ID: 11000155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Observer performance in the localization of tubes and catheters on digital chest images: the role of expertise and image enhancement. Nodine CF; Liu H; Miller WT; Kundel HL Acad Radiol; 1996 Oct; 3(10):834-41. PubMed ID: 8923902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of bedside chest hard-copy screen-film versus hard- and soft-copy computed radiographs in a medical intensive care unit: receiver operating characteristic analysis. Kundel HL; Gefter W; Aronchick J; Miller W; Hatabu H; Whitfill CH; Miller W Radiology; 1997 Dec; 205(3):859-63. PubMed ID: 9393548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical comparative study with a large-area amorphous silicon flat-panel detector: image quality and visibility of anatomic structures on chest radiography. Fink C; Hallscheidt PJ; Noeldge G; Kampschulte A; Radeleff B; Hosch WP; Kauffmann GW; Hansmann J AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Feb; 178(2):481-6. PubMed ID: 11804922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improved visualization of tubes and lines in portable intensive care unit radiographs: a study comparing a new approach to the standard approach. Foos DH; Yankelevitz DF; Wang X; Berlin D; Zappetti D; Cham M; Sanders A; Parker KN; Henschke CI Clin Imaging; 2011; 35(5):346-52. PubMed ID: 21872123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Portable chest radiography in intensive care: a comparison of computed and conventional radiography. Jennings P; Padley SP; Hansell DM Br J Radiol; 1992 Oct; 65(778):852-6. PubMed ID: 1422657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Portable chest radiology in intensive care: a comparison of a new dual characteristic film-screen system (Insight) incorporating a flexible grid with a standard film-screen system. Rottenberg GT; Chin RJ; Allen CM; Maggs P; Kessel D Clin Radiol; 1996 Jul; 51(7):494-8. PubMed ID: 8689825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]