823 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29054375)
1. ATR/CHK1 inhibitors and cancer therapy.
Qiu Z; Oleinick NL; Zhang J
Radiother Oncol; 2018 Mar; 126(3):450-464. PubMed ID: 29054375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inhibition of ATR-dependent feedback activation of Chk1 sensitises cancer cells to Chk1 inhibitor monotherapy.
Massey AJ
Cancer Lett; 2016 Dec; 383(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 27693461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. PARP Inhibition Increases the Reliance on ATR/CHK1 Checkpoint Signaling Leading to Synthetic Lethality-An Alternative Treatment Strategy for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Cells Independent from HR Effectiveness.
Gralewska P; Gajek A; Marczak A; Mikuła M; Ostrowski J; Śliwińska A; Rogalska A
Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Dec; 21(24):. PubMed ID: 33352723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The ATM-Chk2 and ATR-Chk1 pathways in DNA damage signaling and cancer.
Smith J; Tho LM; Xu N; Gillespie DA
Adv Cancer Res; 2010; 108():73-112. PubMed ID: 21034966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. SLFN11 promotes CDT1 degradation by CUL4 in response to replicative DNA damage, while its absence leads to synthetic lethality with ATR/CHK1 inhibitors.
Jo U; Murai Y; Chakka S; Chen L; Cheng K; Murai J; Saha LK; Miller Jenkins LM; Pommier Y
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Feb; 118(6):. PubMed ID: 33536335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perspectives on the combination of radiotherapy and targeted therapy with DNA repair inhibitors in the treatment of pancreatic cancer.
Yang SH; Kuo TC; Wu H; Guo JC; Hsu C; Hsu CH; Tien YW; Yeh KH; Cheng AL; Kuo SH
World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Aug; 22(32):7275-88. PubMed ID: 27621574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Molecular Pathways: Targeting ATR in Cancer Therapy.
Karnitz LM; Zou L
Clin Cancer Res; 2015 Nov; 21(21):4780-5. PubMed ID: 26362996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inhibition of the ATR-CHK1 Pathway in Ewing Sarcoma Cells Causes DNA Damage and Apoptosis via the CDK2-Mediated Degradation of RRM2.
Koppenhafer SL; Goss KL; Terry WW; Gordon DJ
Mol Cancer Res; 2020 Jan; 18(1):91-104. PubMed ID: 31649026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. ATR kinase inhibition induces unscheduled origin firing through a Cdc7-dependent association between GINS and And-1.
Moiseeva T; Hood B; Schamus S; O'Connor MJ; Conrads TP; Bakkenist CJ
Nat Commun; 2017 Nov; 8(1):1392. PubMed ID: 29123096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. ATR-CHK1 pathway as a therapeutic target for acute and chronic leukemias.
Boudny M; Trbusek M
Cancer Treat Rev; 2020 Aug; 88():102026. PubMed ID: 32592909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Exploiting replicative stress in gynecological cancers as a therapeutic strategy.
Ngoi NY; Sundararajan V; Tan DS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Aug; 30(8):1224-1238. PubMed ID: 32571890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cancer-Specific Synthetic Lethality between ATR and CHK1 Kinase Activities.
Sanjiv K; Hagenkort A; Calderón-Montaño JM; Koolmeister T; Reaper PM; Mortusewicz O; Jacques SA; Kuiper RV; Schultz N; Scobie M; Charlton PA; Pollard JR; Berglund UW; Altun M; Helleday T
Cell Rep; 2016 Jan; 14(2):298-309. PubMed ID: 26748709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Genome-Wide Pooled shRNA Screen Identifies PPP2R2A as a Predictive Biomarker for the Response to ATR and CHK1 Inhibitors.
Qiu Z; Fa P; Liu T; Prasad CB; Ma S; Hong Z; Chan ER; Wang H; Li Z; He K; Wang QE; Williams TM; Yan C; Sizemore ST; Narla G; Zhang J
Cancer Res; 2020 Aug; 80(16):3305-3318. PubMed ID: 32522823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related inhibitors and cancer therapy: where we stand.
Mei L; Zhang J; He K; Zhang J
J Hematol Oncol; 2019 Apr; 12(1):43. PubMed ID: 31018854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Curcumin suppresses multiple DNA damage response pathways and has potency as a sensitizer to PARP inhibitor.
Ogiwara H; Ui A; Shiotani B; Zou L; Yasui A; Kohno T
Carcinogenesis; 2013 Nov; 34(11):2486-97. PubMed ID: 23825154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inactivation of PRIM1 Function Sensitizes Cancer Cells to ATR and CHK1 Inhibitors.
Job A; Schmitt LM; von Wenserski L; Lankat-Buttgereit B; Gress TM; Buchholz M; Gallmeier E
Neoplasia; 2018 Nov; 20(11):1135-1143. PubMed ID: 30257222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multiple DNA damage-dependent and DNA damage-independent stress responses define the outcome of ATR/Chk1 targeting in medulloblastoma cells.
Krüger K; Geist K; Stuhldreier F; Schumacher L; Blümel L; Remke M; Wesselborg S; Stork B; Klöcker N; Bormann S; Roos WP; Honnen S; Fritz G
Cancer Lett; 2018 Aug; 430():34-46. PubMed ID: 29753759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differential response of normal and malignant urothelial cells to CHK1 and ATM inhibitors.
Wang WT; Catto JW; Meuth M
Oncogene; 2015 May; 34(22):2887-96. PubMed ID: 25043304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Targeting ATR in DNA damage response and cancer therapeutics.
Fokas E; Prevo R; Hammond EM; Brunner TB; McKenna WG; Muschel RJ
Cancer Treat Rev; 2014 Feb; 40(1):109-17. PubMed ID: 23583268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Co-Inhibition of the DNA Damage Response and CHK1 Enhances Apoptosis of Neuroblastoma Cells.
Ando K; Nakamura Y; Nagase H; Nakagawara A; Koshinaga T; Wada S; Makishima M
Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Jul; 20(15):. PubMed ID: 31362335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
