159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29054509)
1. The Cost-Effectiveness of Salpingectomies for Family Planning in the Prevention of Ovarian Cancer.
Tai RWM; Choi SKY; Coyte PC
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2018 Mar; 40(3):317-327. PubMed ID: 29054509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of opportunistic salpingectomy on ovarian cancer mortality and healthcare costs: a call for universal insurance coverage.
Naumann RW; Hughes BN; Brown J; Drury LK; Herzog TJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 225(4):397.e1-397.e6. PubMed ID: 33798477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy vs tubal ligation at the time of cesarean delivery.
Venkatesh KK; Clark LH; Stamilio DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jan; 220(1):106.e1-106.e10. PubMed ID: 30170036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention.
Dilley SE; Havrilesky LJ; Bakkum-Gamez J; Cohn DE; Michael Straughn J; Caughey AB; Rodriguez MI
Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Aug; 146(2):373-379. PubMed ID: 28577884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risks and benefits of opportunistic salpingectomy during vaginal hysterectomy: a decision analysis.
Cadish LA; Shepherd JP; Barber EL; Ridgeway B
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 217(5):603.e1-603.e6. PubMed ID: 28619689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Costs and benefits of opportunistic salpingectomy as an ovarian cancer prevention strategy.
Kwon JS; McAlpine JN; Hanley GE; Finlayson SJ; Cohen T; Miller DM; Gilks CB; Huntsman DG
Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 125(2):338-345. PubMed ID: 25568991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy versus standard tubal ligation at the time of cesarean delivery for ovarian cancer risk reduction.
Subramaniam A; Einerson BD; Blanchard CT; Erickson BK; Szychowski J; Leath CA; Biggio JR; Huh WK
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Jan; 152(1):127-132. PubMed ID: 30477808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The performance and safety of bilateral salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention in the United States.
Hanley GE; McAlpine JN; Pearce CL; Miller D
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Mar; 216(3):270.e1-270.e9. PubMed ID: 27810554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Postpartum Opportunistic Salpingectomy Compared With Bilateral Tubal Ligation After Vaginal Delivery for Ovarian Cancer Risk Reduction: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Wagar MK; Forlines GL; Moellman N; Carlson A; Matthews M; Williams M
Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Apr; 141(4):819-827. PubMed ID: 36897130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risks and Benefits of Salpingectomy at the Time of Sterilization.
Castellano T; Zerden M; Marsh L; Boggess K
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2017 Nov; 72(11):663-668. PubMed ID: 29164264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ovarian cancer risk reduction through opportunistic salpingectomy.
Kwon JS
J Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Apr; 26(2):83-6. PubMed ID: 25872888
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Complications of female sterilization: immediate and delayed.
Huggins GR; Sondheimer SJ
Fertil Steril; 1984 Mar; 41(3):337-55. PubMed ID: 6230257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Trend, Feasibility, and Safety of Salpingectomy as a form of Permanent Sterilization.
Kim AJ; Barberio A; Berens P; Chen HY; Gants S; Swilinski L; Acholonu U; Chang-Jackson SC
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(7):1363-1368. PubMed ID: 30771489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Applicability, Safety, and Efficiency of Salpingectomy versus Electrocoagulation and Laparoscopic Tubal Section in Ambulatory.
Pereira JMA; Trocado VFB; Gomes SMS; Carlos-Alves M; Carvalho A; Pinheiro PA
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2022 Sep; 44(9):866-870. PubMed ID: 36037814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Extending the safety evidence for opportunistic salpingectomy in prevention of ovarian cancer: a cohort study from British Columbia, Canada.
Hanley GE; Kwon JS; Finlayson SJ; Huntsman DG; Miller D; McAlpine JN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 219(2):172.e1-172.e8. PubMed ID: 29852159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Laparoendoscopic Single-site Surgical Approach to Laparoscopic Salpingectomy.
Scheib SA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 25(2):326-327. PubMed ID: 28342812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Female tubal sterilization: the time has come to routinely consider removal.
Creinin MD; Zite N
Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Sep; 124(3):596-599. PubMed ID: 25162262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ectopic pregnancy in women with previous tubal sterilizations at a Canadian community hospital.
Greisman B
J Reprod Med; 1991 Mar; 36(3):206-9. PubMed ID: 2030496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk-Reducing Salpingectomy Versus Standard Tubal Sterilization: Lessons From Offering Women Options for Interval Sterilization.
Zerden ML; Castellano T; Doll KM; Stuart GS; Munoz MC; Boggess KA
South Med J; 2018 Mar; 111(3):173-177. PubMed ID: 29505655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness of salpingotomy and salpingectomy in women with tubal pregnancy (a randomized controlled trial).
Mol F; van Mello NM; Strandell A; Jurkovic D; Ross JA; Yalcinkaya TM; Barnhart KT; Verhoeve HR; Graziosi GC; Koks CA; Mol BW; Ankum WM; van der Veen F; Hajenius PJ; van Wely M;
Hum Reprod; 2015 Sep; 30(9):2038-47. PubMed ID: 26173606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
