BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29054926)

  • 1. Biomolecular coevolution and its applications: Going from structure prediction toward signaling, epistasis, and function.
    Zerihun MB; Schug A
    Biochem Soc Trans; 2017 Dec; 45(6):1253-1261. PubMed ID: 29054926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Base pairing constraints drive structural epistasis in ribosomal RNA sequences.
    Dutheil JY; Jossinet F; Westhof E
    Mol Biol Evol; 2010 Aug; 27(8):1868-76. PubMed ID: 20211929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Potts Hamiltonian models of protein co-variation, free energy landscapes, and evolutionary fitness.
    Levy RM; Haldane A; Flynn WF
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2017 Apr; 43():55-62. PubMed ID: 27870991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Context-Dependent Mutation Effects in Proteins.
    Poelwijk FJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1851():123-134. PubMed ID: 30298395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genomic investigations of evolutionary dynamics and epistasis in microbial evolution experiments.
    Jerison ER; Desai MM
    Curr Opin Genet Dev; 2015 Dec; 35():33-9. PubMed ID: 26370471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How Good Are Statistical Models at Approximating Complex Fitness Landscapes?
    du Plessis L; Leventhal GE; Bonhoeffer S
    Mol Biol Evol; 2016 Sep; 33(9):2454-68. PubMed ID: 27189564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Topological features of rugged fitness landscapes in sequence space.
    Kondrashov DA; Kondrashov FA
    Trends Genet; 2015 Jan; 31(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 25438718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measuring epistasis in fitness landscapes: The correlation of fitness effects of mutations.
    Ferretti L; Schmiegelt B; Weinreich D; Yamauchi A; Kobayashi Y; Tajima F; Achaz G
    J Theor Biol; 2016 May; 396():132-43. PubMed ID: 26854875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interaction between directional epistasis and average mutational effects.
    Wilke CO; Adami C
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Jul; 268(1475):1469-74. PubMed ID: 11454290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical analysis of mutational epistasis to reveal intramolecular interaction networks in proteins.
    Miton CM; Chen JZ; Ost K; Anderson DW; Tokuriki N
    Methods Enzymol; 2020; 643():243-280. PubMed ID: 32896284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Aligning biological sequences by exploiting residue conservation and coevolution.
    Muntoni AP; Pagnani A; Weigt M; Zamponi F
    Phys Rev E; 2020 Dec; 102(6-1):062409. PubMed ID: 33465950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evolutionary dynamics, epistatic interactions, and biological information.
    Strelioff CC; Lenski RE; Ofria C
    J Theor Biol; 2010 Oct; 266(4):584-94. PubMed ID: 20659477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selection biases the prevalence and type of epistasis along adaptive trajectories.
    Draghi JA; Plotkin JB
    Evolution; 2013 Nov; 67(11):3120-31. PubMed ID: 24151997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fitness landscapes emerging from pharmacodynamic functions in the evolution of multidrug resistance.
    Engelstädter J
    J Evol Biol; 2014 May; 27(5):840-53. PubMed ID: 24720850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Traversing the conceptual divide between biological and statistical epistasis: systems biology and a more modern synthesis.
    Moore JH; Williams SM
    Bioessays; 2005 Jun; 27(6):637-46. PubMed ID: 15892116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The strength of genetic interactions scales weakly with mutational effects.
    Velenich A; Gore J
    Genome Biol; 2013 Jul; 14(7):R76. PubMed ID: 23889884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conservation of coevolving protein interfaces bridges prokaryote-eukaryote homologies in the twilight zone.
    Rodriguez-Rivas J; Marsili S; Juan D; Valencia A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Dec; 113(52):15018-15023. PubMed ID: 27965389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distributions of epistasis in microbes fit predictions from a fitness landscape model.
    Martin G; Elena SF; Lenormand T
    Nat Genet; 2007 Apr; 39(4):555-60. PubMed ID: 17369829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inverse statistical physics of protein sequences: a key issues review.
    Cocco S; Feinauer C; Figliuzzi M; Monasson R; Weigt M
    Rep Prog Phys; 2018 Mar; 81(3):032601. PubMed ID: 29120346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the evolution of epistasis II: a generalized Wright-Kimura framework.
    Liberman U; Puniyani A; Feldman MW
    Theor Popul Biol; 2007 Mar; 71(2):230-8. PubMed ID: 17141817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.