These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

703 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29055096)

  • 1. An improved method for bivariate meta-analysis when within-study correlations are unknown.
    Hong C; D Riley R; Chen Y
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):73-88. PubMed ID: 29055096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An alternative model for bivariate random-effects meta-analysis when the within-study correlations are unknown.
    Riley RD; Thompson JR; Abrams KR
    Biostatistics; 2008 Jan; 9(1):172-86. PubMed ID: 17626226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inference for correlated effect sizes using multiple univariate meta-analyses.
    Chen Y; Cai Y; Hong C; Jackson D
    Stat Med; 2016 Apr; 35(9):1405-22. PubMed ID: 26537017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A generalized-weights solution to sample overlap in meta-analysis.
    Bom PRD; Rachinger H
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Nov; 11(6):812-832. PubMed ID: 32790019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A method of moments estimator for random effect multivariate meta-analysis.
    Chen H; Manning AK; Dupuis J
    Biometrics; 2012 Dec; 68(4):1278-84. PubMed ID: 22551393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating Standardized Effect Sizes for Two- and Three-Level Partially Nested Data.
    Lai MH; Kwok OM
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(6):740-756. PubMed ID: 27802077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meta-analysis of studies with bivariate binary outcomes: a marginal beta-binomial model approach.
    Chen Y; Hong C; Ning Y; Su X
    Stat Med; 2016 Jan; 35(1):21-40. PubMed ID: 26303591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of multiple endpoint dependency on Q and I(2) in meta-analysis.
    Thompson CG; Becker BJ
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Sep; 5(3):235-53. PubMed ID: 26052849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of bivariate random-effects meta-analysis for the joint synthesis of two correlated outcomes.
    Riley RD; Abrams KR; Lambert PC; Sutton AJ; Thompson JR
    Stat Med; 2007 Jan; 26(1):78-97. PubMed ID: 16526010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Univariate and bivariate likelihood-based meta-analysis methods performed comparably when marginal sensitivity and specificity were the targets of inference.
    Dahabreh IJ; Trikalinos TA; Lau J; Schmid CH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Mar; 83():8-17. PubMed ID: 28063915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Permutation inference methods for multivariate meta-analysis.
    Noma H; Nagashima K; Furukawa TA
    Biometrics; 2020 Mar; 76(1):337-347. PubMed ID: 31399994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in simulated random-effects meta-analyses.
    Langan D; Higgins JPT; Jackson D; Bowden J; Veroniki AA; Kontopantelis E; Viechtbauer W; Simmonds M
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):83-98. PubMed ID: 30067315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An alternative pseudolikelihood method for multivariate random-effects meta-analysis.
    Chen Y; Hong C; Riley RD
    Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(3):361-80. PubMed ID: 25363629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multivariate correlation estimator for inferring functional relationships from replicated genome-wide data.
    Zhu D; Li Y; Li H
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Sep; 23(17):2298-305. PubMed ID: 17586543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bivariate random-effects meta-analysis and the estimation of between-study correlation.
    Riley RD; Abrams KR; Sutton AJ; Lambert PC; Thompson JR
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2007 Jan; 7():3. PubMed ID: 17222330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multivariate meta-analysis: a robust approach based on the theory of U-statistic.
    Ma Y; Mazumdar M
    Stat Med; 2011 Oct; 30(24):2911-29. PubMed ID: 21830230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A note on variance estimation in random effects meta-regression.
    Sidik K; Jonkman JN
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(5):823-38. PubMed ID: 16078388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of meta-methods for synthesizing indirect effects.
    van Zundert CHJ; Miočević M
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Nov; 11(6):849-865. PubMed ID: 32833348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A generalized weighting regression-derived meta-analysis estimator robust to small-study effects and heterogeneity.
    Moreno SG; Sutton AJ; Thompson JR; Ades AE; Abrams KR; Cooper NJ
    Stat Med; 2012 Jun; 31(14):1407-17. PubMed ID: 22351645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modified robust variance estimator for generalized estimating equations with improved small-sample performance.
    Wang M; Long Q
    Stat Med; 2011 May; 30(11):1278-91. PubMed ID: 21538453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 36.