These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

703 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29055096)

  • 21. Meta-analysis of multiple outcomes: a multilevel approach.
    Van den Noortgate W; López-López JA; Marín-Martínez F; Sánchez-Meca J
    Behav Res Methods; 2015 Dec; 47(4):1274-1294. PubMed ID: 25361866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Small sample adjustments for robust variance estimation with meta-regression.
    Tipton E
    Psychol Methods; 2015 Sep; 20(3):375-93. PubMed ID: 24773356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Methods to estimate the between-study variance and its uncertainty in meta-analysis.
    Veroniki AA; Jackson D; Viechtbauer W; Bender R; Bowden J; Knapp G; Kuss O; Higgins JP; Langan D; Salanti G
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Mar; 7(1):55-79. PubMed ID: 26332144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Multivariate meta-analysis using individual participant data.
    Riley RD; Price MJ; Jackson D; Wardle M; Gueyffier F; Wang J; Staessen JA; White IR
    Res Synth Methods; 2015 Jun; 6(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 26099484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Variance estimation in inverse probability weighted Cox models.
    Shu D; Young JG; Toh S; Wang R
    Biometrics; 2021 Sep; 77(3):1101-1117. PubMed ID: 32662087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessing meta-regression methods for examining moderator relationships with dependent effect sizes: A Monte Carlo simulation.
    López-López JA; Van den Noortgate W; Tanner-Smith EE; Wilson SJ; Lipsey MW
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Dec; 8(4):435-450. PubMed ID: 28556477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of heteroscedasticity between treatment groups on mixed-effects models for repeated measures.
    Gosho M; Maruo K
    Pharm Stat; 2018 Sep; 17(5):578-592. PubMed ID: 29978944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A double SIMEX approach for bivariate random-effects meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Guolo A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):6. PubMed ID: 28077079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A closed-form estimator for meta-analysis and surrogate markers evaluation.
    Flórez AJ; Molenberghs G; Verbeke G; Abad AA
    J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(2):318-332. PubMed ID: 30365364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Statistical inferences for data from studies conducted with an aggregated multivariate outcome-dependent sample design.
    Lu TS; Longnecker MP; Zhou H
    Stat Med; 2017 Mar; 36(6):985-997. PubMed ID: 27966260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in combining results of studies.
    Sidik K; Jonkman JN
    Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(9):1964-81. PubMed ID: 16955539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Zero-cell corrections in random-effects meta-analyses.
    Weber F; Knapp G; Ickstadt K; Kundt G; Glass Ä
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Nov; 11(6):913-919. PubMed ID: 32991790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Multivariate meta-analysis: potential and promise.
    Jackson D; Riley R; White IR
    Stat Med; 2011 Sep; 30(20):2481-98. PubMed ID: 21268052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Selecting the best meta-analytic estimator for evidence-based practice: a simulation study.
    Doi SAR; Furuya-Kanamori L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2020 Mar; 18(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 31764215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Robust versus consistent variance estimators in marginal structural Cox models.
    Enders D; Engel S; Linder R; Pigeot I
    Stat Med; 2018 Oct; 37(24):3455-3470. PubMed ID: 29888510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Learning from local to global: An efficient distributed algorithm for modeling time-to-event data.
    Duan R; Luo C; Schuemie MJ; Tong J; Liang CJ; Chang HH; Boland MR; Bian J; Xu H; Holmes JH; Forrest CB; Morton SC; Berlin JA; Moore JH; Mahoney KB; Chen Y
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2020 Jul; 27(7):1028-1036. PubMed ID: 32626900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Advances in the meta-analysis of heterogeneous clinical trials II: The quality effects model.
    Doi SA; Barendregt JJ; Khan S; Thalib L; Williams GM
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 Nov; 45(Pt A):123-9. PubMed ID: 26003432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A pairwise likelihood augmented Cox estimator for left-truncated data.
    Wu F; Kim S; Qin J; Saran R; Li Y
    Biometrics; 2018 Mar; 74(1):100-108. PubMed ID: 28853158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Random effects meta-analysis: Coverage performance of 95% confidence and prediction intervals following REML estimation.
    Partlett C; Riley RD
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):301-317. PubMed ID: 27714841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 36.