These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1041 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29055236)

  • 1. The importance of academic literacy for undergraduate nursing students and its relationship to future professional clinical practice: A systematic review.
    Jefferies D; McNally S; Roberts K; Wallace A; Stunden A; D'Souza S; Glew P
    Nurse Educ Today; 2018 Jan; 60():84-91. PubMed ID: 29055236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.
    MacKinnon K; Marcellus L; Rivers J; Gordon C; Ryan M; Butcher D
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 26447004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy of teaching methods used to develop critical thinking in nursing and midwifery undergraduate students: A systematic review of the literature.
    Carter AG; Creedy DK; Sidebotham M
    Nurse Educ Today; 2016 May; 40():209-18. PubMed ID: 27125175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of tools used to measure critical thinking development in nursing and midwifery undergraduate students: a systematic review.
    Carter AG; Creedy DK; Sidebotham M
    Nurse Educ Today; 2015 Jul; 35(7):864-74. PubMed ID: 25817987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nursing students' understanding of critical thinking and appraisal and academic writing: a descriptive, qualitative study.
    Borglin G; Fagerström C
    Nurse Educ Pract; 2012 Nov; 12(6):356-60. PubMed ID: 22633117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effectiveness and experience of arts-based pedagogy among undergraduate nursing students: a mixed methods systematic review.
    Rieger KL; Chernomas WM; McMillan DE; Morin FL; Demczuk L
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Nov; 14(11):139-239. PubMed ID: 27941518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Seeking transformation: how students in nursing view their academic writing context - a qualitative systematic review.
    Mitchell KM; Blanchard L; Roberts T
    Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh; 2020 Oct; 17(1):. PubMed ID: 33119544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Promoting critical thinking and academic writing skills in nurse education.
    Borglin G
    Nurse Educ Today; 2012 Jul; 32(5):611-3. PubMed ID: 21807442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using a science simulation-based learning tool to develop students' active learning, self-confidence and critical thinking in academic writing.
    O'Flaherty J; Costabile M
    Nurse Educ Pract; 2020 Aug; 47():102839. PubMed ID: 32943173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The value of reflective journaling in undergraduate nursing education: a literature review.
    Epp S
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2008 Sep; 45(9):1379-88. PubMed ID: 18325522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A guide to nursing students' written reflections for students and educators.
    Naber J; Markley L
    Nurse Educ Pract; 2017 Jul; 25():1-4. PubMed ID: 28437690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reflective writing: a strategy to foster critical inquiry in undergraduate nursing students.
    Usher K; Francis D; Owens J; Tollefson J
    Aust J Adv Nurs; 1999; 17(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 10776086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Promoting emotional intelligence and resilience in undergraduate nursing students: An integrative review.
    Cleary M; Visentin D; West S; Lopez V; Kornhaber R
    Nurse Educ Today; 2018 Sep; 68():112-120. PubMed ID: 29902740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The inclusion of LGBT+ health issues within undergraduate healthcare education and professional training programmes: A systematic review.
    McCann E; Brown M
    Nurse Educ Today; 2018 May; 64():204-214. PubMed ID: 29510349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A systematic review of critical thinking in nursing education.
    Chan ZC
    Nurse Educ Today; 2013 Mar; 33(3):236-40. PubMed ID: 23394977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of research in undergraduate nursing students' theses: A mixed methods study.
    Nordsteien A; Horntvedt MT; Syse J
    Nurse Educ Today; 2017 Sep; 56():23-28. PubMed ID: 28646707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measuring critical thinking in pre-registration midwifery students: A multi-method approach.
    Carter AG; Creedy DK; Sidebotham M
    Nurse Educ Today; 2018 Feb; 61():169-174. PubMed ID: 29216601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Making the link between critical appraisal, thinking and analysis.
    Whiffin CJ; Hasselder A
    Br J Nurs; 2013 Jul 25-Aug 7; 22(14):831-5. PubMed ID: 24260994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bachelor nursing students´ and their educators´ experiences of teaching strategies targeting critical thinking: A scoping review.
    Westerdahl F; Carlson E; Wennick A; Borglin G
    Nurse Educ Pract; 2022 Aug; 63():103409. PubMed ID: 35868062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using Quantitative Literacy to Enhance Critical Thinking Skills in Undergraduate Nursing Students.
    Asknes E
    J Nurs Educ; 2017 Apr; 56(4):240-242. PubMed ID: 28383750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 53.