These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29055251)

  • 1. Consistency of selected craniometric landmark locations and the resulting variation in measurements.
    Smith AC; Boaks A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Nov; 280():156-163. PubMed ID: 29055251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How "standardized" is standardized? A validation of postcranial landmark locations.
    Smith AC; Boaks A
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Nov; 59(6):1457-65. PubMed ID: 25069898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy and reliability of measurements obtained from computed tomography 3D volume rendered images.
    Stull KE; Tise ML; Ali Z; Fowler DR
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 May; 238():133-40. PubMed ID: 24713466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Error quantification of osteometric data in forensic anthropology.
    Langley NR; Meadows Jantz L; McNulty S; Maijanen H; Ousley SD; Jantz RL
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Jun; 287():183-189. PubMed ID: 29698914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A study of cranial variations based on craniometric indices in a South Indian population.
    Kanchan T; Krishan K; Gupta A; Acharya J
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):1645-9. PubMed ID: 25162547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A standardized nomenclature for craniofacial and facial anthropometry.
    Caple J; Stephan CN
    Int J Legal Med; 2016 May; 130(3):863-79. PubMed ID: 26662189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Standardization and quality assurance in skeletal landmark placement and osteometry.
    Liebenberg L; Krüger GC
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Mar; 308():110168. PubMed ID: 32006879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interobserver variation of selected postcranial skeletal measurements.
    Adams BJ; Byrd JE
    J Forensic Sci; 2002 Nov; 47(6):1193-202. PubMed ID: 12455639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intraobserver Error in Macromorphoscopic Trait Data,
    Kamnikar KR; Plemons AM; Hefner JT
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Mar; 63(2):361-370. PubMed ID: 28542737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automatic landmark annotation in 3D surface scans of skulls: Methodological proposal and reliability study.
    Bermejo E; Taniguchi K; Ogawa Y; Martos R; Valsecchi A; Mesejo P; Ibáñez O; Imaizumi K
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Oct; 210():106380. PubMed ID: 34478914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Craniometric analysis of the modern Cretan population.
    Kranioti EF; Işcan MY; Michalodimitrakis M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Sep; 180(2-3):110.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18718728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Variation within physical and digital craniometrics.
    Lee M; Gerdau-Radonic K
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Jan; 306():110092. PubMed ID: 31816484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variation in the measurement of cranial volume and surface area using 3D laser scanning technology.
    Sholts SB; Wärmländer SK; Flores LM; Miller KW; Walker PL
    J Forensic Sci; 2010 Jul; 55(4):871-6. PubMed ID: 20384925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consistency and precision of landmark identification in three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography scans.
    Schlicher W; Nielsen I; Huang JC; Maki K; Hatcher DC; Miller AJ
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):263-75. PubMed ID: 21385857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Technical note: comparability of Hrdlička's Catalog of Crania data based on measurement landmark definitions.
    Stojanowski CM; Euber JK
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2011 Sep; 146(1):143-9. PubMed ID: 21766286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measurement precision and reliability in craniofacial anthropometry: implications and suggestions for clinical applications.
    Ward RE; Jamison PL
    J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol; 1991; 11(3):156-64. PubMed ID: 1761648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ancestry Estimation in Forensic Anthropology: Geometric Morphometric versus Standard and Nonstandard Interlandmark Distances.
    Katherine Spradley M; Jantz RL
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 Jul; 61(4):892-7. PubMed ID: 27364267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Standardization of 3-D CT measurements for length and angles by matrix transformation in the 3-D coordinate system.
    Kitaura H; Yonetsu K; Kitamori H; Kobayashi K; Nakamura T
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2000 Jul; 37(4):349-56. PubMed ID: 10912713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of sex in a modern Turkish population using cranial anthropometric parameters.
    Ekizoglu O; Hocaoglu E; Inci E; Can IO; Solmaz D; Aksoy S; Buran CF; Sayin I
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2016 Jul; 21():45-52. PubMed ID: 27497333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. "What and how should we share?" An inter-method inter-observer comparison of measurement error with landmark-based craniometric datasets.
    Bertsatos A; Gkaniatsou E; Papageorgopoulou C; Chovalopoulou ME
    Anthropol Anz; 2020 Apr; 77(2):109-120. PubMed ID: 31851205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.