298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29056355)
1. Three-dimensional macroporous materials for tissue engineering of craniofacial bone.
Shakya AK; Kandalam U
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Nov; 55(9):875-891. PubMed ID: 29056355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cryogel scaffolds from patient-specific 3D-printed molds for personalized tissue-engineered bone regeneration in pediatric cleft-craniofacial defects.
Hixon KR; Melvin AM; Lin AY; Hall AF; Sell SA
J Biomater Appl; 2017 Nov; 32(5):598-611. PubMed ID: 28980856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-Dimensional Bioprinting for Regenerative Dentistry and Craniofacial Tissue Engineering.
Obregon F; Vaquette C; Ivanovski S; Hutmacher DW; Bertassoni LE
J Dent Res; 2015 Sep; 94(9 Suppl):143S-52S. PubMed ID: 26124216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional printing of bone repair and replacement materials: impact on craniofacial surgery.
Ricci JL; Clark EA; Murriky A; Smay JE
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 23(1):304-8. PubMed ID: 22337431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bone regeneration in 3D printing bioactive ceramic scaffolds with improved tissue/material interface pore architecture in thin-wall bone defect.
Shao H; Ke X; Liu A; Sun M; He Y; Yang X; Fu J; Liu Y; Zhang L; Yang G; Xu S; Gou Z
Biofabrication; 2017 Apr; 9(2):025003. PubMed ID: 28287077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A biodegradable porous composite scaffold of PGA/beta-TCP for bone tissue engineering.
Cao H; Kuboyama N
Bone; 2010 Feb; 46(2):386-95. PubMed ID: 19800045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Craniofacial bone tissue engineering.
Petrovic V; Zivkovic P; Petrovic D; Stefanovic V
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Sep; 114(3):e1-9. PubMed ID: 22862985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Macroporous Hydrogels Composed Entirely of Synthetic Polypeptides: Biocompatible and Enzyme Biodegradable 3D Cellular Scaffolds.
Shirbin SJ; Karimi F; Chan NJ; Heath DE; Qiao GG
Biomacromolecules; 2016 Sep; 17(9):2981-91. PubMed ID: 27472153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The calcification potential of cryogel scaffolds incorporated with various forms of hydroxyapatite for bone regeneration.
Hixon KR; Eberlin CT; Lu T; Neal SM; Case ND; McBride-Gagyi SH; Sell SA
Biomed Mater; 2017 Mar; 12(2):025005. PubMed ID: 28145891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Winner of the Young Investigator Award of the Society for Biomaterials at the 10th World Biomaterials Congress, May 17-22, 2016, Montreal QC, Canada: Microribbon-based hydrogels accelerate stem cell-based bone regeneration in a mouse critical-size cranial defect model.
Han LH; Conrad B; Chung MT; Deveza L; Jiang X; Wang A; Butte MJ; Longaker MT; Wan D; Yang F
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2016 Jun; 104(6):1321-31. PubMed ID: 26991141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Citric acid-based hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds enhance calvarial regeneration.
Sun D; Chen Y; Tran RT; Xu S; Xie D; Jia C; Wang Y; Guo Y; Zhang Z; Guo J; Yang J; Jin D; Bai X
Sci Rep; 2014 Nov; 4():6912. PubMed ID: 25372769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Engineering craniofacial scaffolds.
Hollister SJ; Lin CY; Saito E; Lin CY; Schek RD; Taboas JM; Williams JM; Partee B; Flanagan CL; Diggs A; Wilke EN; Van Lenthe GH; Müller R; Wirtz T; Das S; Feinberg SE; Krebsbach PH
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2005 Aug; 8(3):162-73. PubMed ID: 16022718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Macroporous interconnected dextran scaffolds of controlled porosity for tissue-engineering applications.
Lévesque SG; Lim RM; Shoichet MS
Biomaterials; 2005 Dec; 26(35):7436-46. PubMed ID: 16023718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomaterials for Craniofacial Bone Regeneration.
Thrivikraman G; Athirasala A; Twohig C; Boda SK; Bertassoni LE
Dent Clin North Am; 2017 Oct; 61(4):835-856. PubMed ID: 28886771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional glass-derived scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: current trends and forecasts for the future.
Baino F; Vitale-Brovarone C
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2011 Jun; 97(4):514-35. PubMed ID: 21465645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing three different three-dimensional scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: an in vivo study.
Rismanchian M; Nosouhian S; Razavi SM; Davoudi A; Sadeghiyan H
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Jan; 16(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 25876946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-Dimensional Printing of Hollow-Struts-Packed Bioceramic Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration.
Luo Y; Zhai D; Huan Z; Zhu H; Xia L; Chang J; Wu C
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2015 Nov; 7(43):24377-83. PubMed ID: 26479454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Temperature-driven processing techniques for manufacturing fully interconnected porous scaffolds in bone tissue engineering.
Guarino V; Ambrosio L
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2010 Dec; 224(12):1389-400. PubMed ID: 21287827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Inorganic/organic biocomposite cryogels for regeneration of bony tissues.
Mishra R; Kumar A
J Biomater Sci Polym Ed; 2011; 22(16):2107-26. PubMed ID: 21067655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Review of craniofacial regeneration in China.
Li Y; Zhang Q; Xie X; Xiao D; Lin Y
J Oral Rehabil; 2020 Nov; 47 Suppl 1():107-117. PubMed ID: 30868603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
