132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29056447)
1. Comparison of ten different DNA extraction procedures with respect to their suitability for environmental samples.
Kuhn R; Böllmann J; Krahl K; Bryant IM; Martienssen M
J Microbiol Methods; 2017 Dec; 143():78-86. PubMed ID: 29056447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of five soil DNA extraction methods and a rapid laboratory-developed method for quality soil DNA extraction for 16S rDNA-based amplification and library construction.
Sagar K; Singh SP; Goutam KK; Konwar BK
J Microbiol Methods; 2014 Feb; 97():68-73. PubMed ID: 24280193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Rapid and Economical Method for Efficient DNA Extraction from Diverse Soils Suitable for Metagenomic Applications.
Devi SG; Fathima AA; Radha S; Arunraj R; Curtis WR; Ramya M
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132441. PubMed ID: 26167854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microbes on building materials--evaluation of DNA extraction protocols as common basis for molecular analysis.
Ettenauer JD; Piñar G; Lopandic K; Spangl B; Ellersdorfer G; Voitl C; Sterflinger K
Sci Total Environ; 2012 Nov; 439():44-53. PubMed ID: 23063637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of metagenomic DNA extraction procedures on the identifiable endophytic bacterial diversity in Sorghum bicolor (L. Moench).
Maropola MK; Ramond JB; Trindade M
J Microbiol Methods; 2015 May; 112():104-17. PubMed ID: 25775938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of extraction and purification methods for obtaining PCR-amplifiable DNA from compost for microbial community analysis.
LaMontagne MG; Michel FC; Holden PA; Reddy CA
J Microbiol Methods; 2002 May; 49(3):255-64. PubMed ID: 11869790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of bacterial diversity in selected Philippine fermented food products through PCR-DGGE.
Dalmacio LM; Angeles AK; Larcia LL; Balolong MP; Estacio RC
Benef Microbes; 2011 Dec; 2(4):273-81. PubMed ID: 22146687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Normalization of soil DNA extraction for accurate quantification of target genes by real-time PCR and DGGE.
Park JW; Crowley DE
Biotechniques; 2005 Apr; 38(4):579-86. PubMed ID: 15884676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bacterial community analysis of activated sludge: an evaluation of four commonly used DNA extraction methods.
Vanysacker L; Declerck SA; Hellemans B; De Meester L; Vankelecom I; Declerck P
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2010 Sep; 88(1):299-307. PubMed ID: 20652692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative PCR methods for RNA and DNA in marine sediments: maximizing yield while overcoming inhibition.
Lloyd KG; Macgregor BJ; Teske A
FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2010 Apr; 72(1):143-51. PubMed ID: 20059545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. DNA extraction method affects microbial community profiles from soils and sediment.
Carrigg C; Rice O; Kavanagh S; Collins G; O'Flaherty V
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 Dec; 77(4):955-64. PubMed ID: 17960375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of four DNA extraction methods for comprehensive assessment of 16S rRNA bacterial diversity in marine biofilms using high-throughput sequencing.
Corcoll N; Österlund T; Sinclair L; Eiler A; Kristiansson E; Backhaus T; Eriksson KM
FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2017 Aug; 364(14):. PubMed ID: 28673033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Enhanced method for microbial community DNA extraction and purification from agricultural yellow loess soil.
Kathiravan MN; Gim GH; Ryu J; Kim PI; Lee CW; Kim SW
J Microbiol; 2015 Nov; 53(11):767-75. PubMed ID: 26502961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A quantitative analysis of DNA extraction and purification from compost.
Howeler M; Ghiorse WC; Walker LP
J Microbiol Methods; 2003 Jul; 54(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 12732420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Data on DNA gel sample load, gel electrophoresis, PCR and cost analysis.
Kuhn R; Böllmann J; Krahl K; Bryant IM; Martienssen M
Data Brief; 2018 Feb; 16():732-751. PubMed ID: 29270456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Acinetobacter diversity in environmental samples assessed by 16S rRNA gene PCR-DGGE fingerprinting.
Vanbroekhoven K; Ryngaert A; Wattiau P; Mot R; Springael D
FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2004 Oct; 50(1):37-50. PubMed ID: 19712375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative improvement of 16S rDNA DGGE analysis for soil bacterial community using real-time PCR.
Ahn JH; Kim YJ; Kim T; Song HG; Kang C; Ka JO
J Microbiol Methods; 2009 Aug; 78(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 19523498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Back to Basics--The Influence of DNA Extraction and Primer Choice on Phylogenetic Analysis of Activated Sludge Communities.
Albertsen M; Karst SM; Ziegler AS; Kirkegaard RH; Nielsen PH
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132783. PubMed ID: 26182345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparison of direct and indirect environmental DNA extraction methods for samples from a high-temperature environment].
Liu HW; Peng Q; Li QY; Xiao W; Cui XL; Lin LB; Liu ZJ; Jiang CL; Xu LH; Chen YG; Wang ZG; Ren Z; Deng L; Wen ML
Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao; 2006 Dec; 46(6):1018-22. PubMed ID: 17302174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative study of methods for extraction and purification of environmental DNA from soil and sludge samples.
Roh C; Villatte F; Kim BG; Schmid RD
Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2006 Aug; 134(2):97-112. PubMed ID: 16943632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
