These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29056447)

  • 21. Optimisation of DNA extraction and validation of PCR assays to detect Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis.
    Timms VJ; Mitchell HM; Neilan BA
    J Microbiol Methods; 2015 May; 112():99-103. PubMed ID: 25797305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An effective method for isolation of DNA from pig faeces and comparison of five different methods.
    Tang JN; Zeng ZG; Wang HN; Yang T; Zhang PJ; Li YL; Zhang AY; Fan WQ; Zhang Y; Yang X; Zhao SJ; Tian GB; Zou LK
    J Microbiol Methods; 2008 Dec; 75(3):432-6. PubMed ID: 18700153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. PCR in Metagenomics.
    Johny TK; Bhat SG
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1620():249-265. PubMed ID: 28540713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Analysis of microbial diversity by pyrosequencing the small-subunit ribosomal RNA without PCR amplification.
    Li XR; Lv Y; Meng H; Gu JD; Quan ZX
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2014 Apr; 98(8):3777-89. PubMed ID: 24531274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Improved DNA purification with quality assurance for evaluation of the microbial genetic content of constructed wetlands.
    Huang W; Guo J; Tao R; Man Y; Dai Y; Yang Y
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2017 Nov; 101(21):7923-7931. PubMed ID: 28918434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The near-quantitative sampling of genomic DNA from various food-borne Eubacteria.
    Irwin P; Nguyen L; He Y; Paoli G; Gehring A; Chen CY
    BMC Microbiol; 2014 Dec; 14():326. PubMed ID: 25551371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Statistical assessment of DNA extraction methodology for culture-independent analysis of microbial community associated with diverse environmental samples.
    Mahajan R; Attri S; Sharma K; Singh N; Sharma D; Goel G
    Mol Biol Rep; 2018 Jun; 45(3):297-308. PubMed ID: 29453765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An improved protocol for DNA extraction from alkaline soil and sediment samples for constructing metagenomic libraries.
    Verma D; Satyanarayana T
    Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2011 Sep; 165(2):454-64. PubMed ID: 21519906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Real-time quantitative PCR assay on bacterial DNA: In a model soil system and environmental samples.
    Kabir S; Rajendran N; Amemiya T; Itoh K
    J Gen Appl Microbiol; 2003 Apr; 49(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 12833213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Analysis of bacterial diversity in river biofilms using 16S rDNA PCR-DGGE: methodological settings and fingerprints interpretation.
    Lyautey E; Lacoste B; Ten-Hage L; Rols JL; Garabetian F
    Water Res; 2005; 39(2-3):380-8. PubMed ID: 15644246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Diversity and geographical distribution of members of the Streptomyces violaceusniger 16S rRNA gene clade detected by clade-specific PCR primers.
    Kumar Y; Aiemsum-Ang P; Ward AC; Goodfellow M
    FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2007 Oct; 62(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 17725621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of different methods of DNA extraction for activated sludge on the subsequent analysis of bacterial community profiles.
    Sun L; Ouyang X; Tang Y; Yang Y; Luo Y
    Water Environ Res; 2012 Feb; 84(2):108-14. PubMed ID: 22515059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of methods for total community DNA extraction and purification from compost.
    Yang ZhH; Xiao Y; Zeng GM; Xu ZhY; Liu YSh
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 Mar; 74(4):918-25. PubMed ID: 17115207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sponge-associated actinobacterial diversity: validation of the methods of actinobacterial DNA extraction and optimization of 16S rRNA gene amplification.
    Yang Q; Franco CM; Zhang W
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2015 Oct; 99(20):8731-40. PubMed ID: 26245685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [DNA extraction methods of compost for molecular ecology analysis].
    Yang ZH; Xiao Y; Zeng GM; Liu YG; Deng JH
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2006 Aug; 27(8):1613-7. PubMed ID: 17111621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Optimized sequence retrieval from single bands of temperature gradient gel electrophoresis profiles of the amplified 16S rDNA fragments from an activated sludge system.
    Zhang X; Yan X; Gao P; Wang L; Zhou Z; Zhao L
    J Microbiol Methods; 2005 Jan; 60(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 15567219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Microbial food safety: Potential of DNA extraction methods for use in diagnostic metagenomics.
    Josefsen MH; Andersen SC; Christensen J; Hoorfar J
    J Microbiol Methods; 2015 Jul; 114():30-4. PubMed ID: 25937085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Purification of total DNA extracted from activated sludge.
    Shan G; Jin W; Lam EK; Xing X
    J Environ Sci (China); 2008; 20(1):80-7. PubMed ID: 18572527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The truth about metagenomics: quantifying and counteracting bias in 16S rRNA studies.
    Brooks JP; Edwards DJ; Harwich MD; Rivera MC; Fettweis JM; Serrano MG; Reris RA; Sheth NU; Huang B; Girerd P; ; Strauss JF; Jefferson KK; Buck GA
    BMC Microbiol; 2015 Mar; 15():66. PubMed ID: 25880246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation and optimisation of bacterial genomic DNA extraction for no-culture techniques applied to vinegars.
    Mamlouk D; Hidalgo C; Torija MJ; Gullo M
    Food Microbiol; 2011 Oct; 28(7):1374-9. PubMed ID: 21839388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.