BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29057288)

  • 1. Fully automated segmentation of prostate whole gland and transition zone in diffusion-weighted MRI using convolutional neural networks.
    Clark T; Zhang J; Baig S; Wong A; Haider MA; Khalvati F
    J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2017 Oct; 4(4):041307. PubMed ID: 29057288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Segmentation of prostate zones using probabilistic atlas-based method with diffusion-weighted MR images.
    Singh D; Kumar V; Das CJ; Singh A; Mehndiratta A
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Nov; 196():105572. PubMed ID: 32544780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fully automatic segmentation on prostate MR images based on cascaded fully convolution network.
    Zhu Y; Wei R; Gao G; Ding L; Zhang X; Wang X; Zhang J
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Apr; 49(4):1149-1156. PubMed ID: 30350434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automated prostate multi-regional segmentation in magnetic resonance using fully convolutional neural networks.
    Jimenez-Pastor A; Lopez-Gonzalez R; Fos-Guarinos B; Garcia-Castro F; Wittenberg M; Torregrosa-Andrés A; Marti-Bonmati L; Garcia-Fontes M; Duarte P; Gambini JP; Bittencourt LK; Kitamura FC; Venugopal VK; Mahajan V; Ros P; Soria-Olivas E; Alberich-Bayarri A
    Eur Radiol; 2023 Jul; 33(7):5087-5096. PubMed ID: 36690774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automated segmentation of prostate zonal anatomy on T2-weighted (T2W) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map MR images using U-Nets.
    Zabihollahy F; Schieda N; Krishna Jeyaraj S; Ukwatta E
    Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 46(7):3078-3090. PubMed ID: 31002381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effectiveness and Accuracy of MRI-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy Based on PI-RADS v2.1 Category in Transition/Peripheral Zone of the Prostate.
    Liu Y; Wang S; Xu G; Zhou B; Zhang Y; Ye B; Xiang L; Zhang Y; Xu H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Sep; 58(3):709-717. PubMed ID: 36773016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Segmentation of the Prostate Transition Zone and Peripheral Zone on MR Images with Deep Learning.
    Bardis M; Houshyar R; Chantaduly C; Tran-Harding K; Ushinsky A; Chahine C; Rupasinghe M; Chow D; Chang P
    Radiol Imaging Cancer; 2021 May; 3(3):e200024. PubMed ID: 33929265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. PI-RADS Versions 2 and 2.1: Interobserver Agreement and Diagnostic Performance in Peripheral and Transition Zone Lesions Among Six Radiologists.
    Bhayana R; O'Shea A; Anderson MA; Bradley WR; Gottumukkala RV; Mojtahed A; Pierce TT; Harisinghani M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Jul; 217(1):141-151. PubMed ID: 32903060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Segmentation of the prostate, its zones, anterior fibromuscular stroma, and urethra on the MRIs and multimodality image fusion using U-Net model.
    Rezaeijo SM; Jafarpoor Nesheli S; Fatan Serj M; Tahmasebi Birgani MJ
    Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2022 Oct; 12(10):4786-4804. PubMed ID: 36185056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of interreader reproducibility of the prostate imaging reporting and data system and likert scales for evaluation of multiparametric prostate MRI.
    Rosenkrantz AB; Lim RP; Haghighi M; Somberg MB; Babb JS; Taneja SS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Oct; 201(4):W612-8. PubMed ID: 24059400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Deep Learning Whole-Gland and Zonal Prostate Segmentation on a Public MRI Dataset.
    Cuocolo R; Comelli A; Stefano A; Benfante V; Dahiya N; Stanzione A; Castaldo A; De Lucia DR; Yezzi A; Imbriaco M
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Aug; 54(2):452-459. PubMed ID: 33634932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prevalence of Prostate Cancer in PI-RADS Version 2.1 Transition Zone Atypical Nodules Upgraded by Abnormal DWI: Correlation With MRI-Directed TRUS-Guided Targeted Biopsy.
    Lim CS; Abreu-Gomez J; Carrion I; Schieda N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Mar; 216(3):683-690. PubMed ID: 32755208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of Weighted Diffusion Subtraction for Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
    Sato T; Isoda H; Fujimoto K; Furuta A; Fujimoto M; Ito K; Kobayashi T; Nakamoto Y
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Dec; 54(6):1979-1988. PubMed ID: 34085328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Autosegmentation of Prostate Zones and Cancer Regions from Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Images by Using Deep-Learning-Based Neural Networks.
    Lai CC; Wang HK; Wang FN; Peng YC; Lin TP; Peng HH; Shen SH
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Apr; 21(8):. PubMed ID: 33921451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exploring Uncertainty Measures in Bayesian Deep Attentive Neural Networks for Prostate Zonal Segmentation.
    Liu Y; Yang G; Hosseiny M; Azadikhah A; Mirak SA; Miao Q; Raman SS; Sung K
    IEEE Access; 2020; 8():151817-151828. PubMed ID: 33564563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective PI-RADS v2.1 Atypical Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Nodules With Marked Restricted Diffusion: Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Multiparametric MRI.
    Costa DN; Jia L; Subramanian N; Xi Y; Rofsky NM; Recchimuzzi DZ; de Leon AD; Arraj P; Pedrosa I
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Aug; 217(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 32876473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Triexponential function analysis of diffusion-weighted MRI for diagnosing prostate cancer.
    Ueda Y; Takahashi S; Ohno N; Kyotani K; Kawamitu H; Miyati T; Aoyama N; Ueno Y; Kitajima K; Kawakami F; Okuaki T; Tsukamoto R; Yanagita E; Sugimura K
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jan; 43(1):138-48. PubMed ID: 26119033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of the PI-RADS language: predictive values of PI-RADS lexicon descriptors for detection of prostate cancer.
    Rudolph MM; Baur ADJ; Haas M; Cash H; Miller K; Mahjoub S; Hartenstein A; Kaufmann D; Rotzinger R; Lee CH; Asbach P; Hamm B; Penzkofer T
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Aug; 30(8):4262-4271. PubMed ID: 32219507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Proposed Adjustments to PI-RADS Version 2 Decision Rules: Impact on Prostate Cancer Detection.
    Rosenkrantz AB; Babb JS; Taneja SS; Ream JM
    Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):119-129. PubMed ID: 27783538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic performance of PI-RADS version 2.1 compared to version 2.0 for detection of peripheral and transition zone prostate cancer.
    Rudolph MM; Baur ADJ; Cash H; Haas M; Mahjoub S; Hartenstein A; Hamm CA; Beetz NL; Konietschke F; Hamm B; Asbach P; Penzkofer T
    Sci Rep; 2020 Sep; 10(1):15982. PubMed ID: 32994502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.