205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29058962)
1. Performance of shear-wave elastography for breast masses using different region-of-interest (ROI) settings.
Youk JH; Son EJ; Han K; Gweon HM; Kim JA
Acta Radiol; 2018 Jul; 59(7):789-797. PubMed ID: 29058962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of region of interest (ROI) size on the diagnostic performance of shear wave elastography in differentiating solid breast lesions.
Moon JH; Hwang JY; Park JS; Koh SH; Park SY
Acta Radiol; 2018 Jun; 59(6):657-663. PubMed ID: 28899126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of 3D and 2D shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses: focus on the diagnostic performance.
Choi HY; Sohn YM; Seo M
Clin Radiol; 2017 Oct; 72(10):878-886. PubMed ID: 28526455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Two-dimensional shear wave elastography of breast lesions: Comparison of two different systems.
Ren WW; Li XL; He YP; Li DD; Wang D; Zhao CK; Bo XW; Liu BJ; Yue WW; Xu HX
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2017; 66(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 28211807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of region of interest size and ultrasound lesion size on the performance of 2D shear wave elastography (SWE) in solid breast masses.
Skerl K; Vinnicombe S; Giannotti E; Thomson K; Evans A
Clin Radiol; 2015 Dec; 70(12):1421-7. PubMed ID: 26455652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application of 3D and 2D quantitative shear wave elastography (SWE) to differentiate between benign and malignant breast masses.
Tian J; Liu Q; Wang X; Xing P; Yang Z; Wu C
Sci Rep; 2017 Jan; 7():41216. PubMed ID: 28106134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of peritumoral stromal tissue stiffness obtained by shear wave elastography between benign and malignant breast lesions.
Park HS; Shin HJ; Shin KC; Cha JH; Chae EY; Choi WJ; Kim HH
Acta Radiol; 2018 Oct; 59(10):1168-1175. PubMed ID: 29359949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Shear-Wave Elastography of the Breast: Impact of Technical Image Quality Parameters on Diagnostic Accuracy.
Chou SS; Baikpour M; Zhang W; Mercaldo SF; Lehman CD; Samir AE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 May; 216(5):1205-1215. PubMed ID: 33729888
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative Lesion-to-Fat Elasticity Ratio Measured by Shear-Wave Elastography for Breast Mass: Which Area Should Be Selected as the Fat Reference?
Youk JH; Son EJ; Gweon HM; Han KH; Kim JA
PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138074. PubMed ID: 26368920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison and Combination of Strain and Shear Wave Elastography of Breast Masses for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Lesions by Quantitative Assessment: Preliminary Study.
Seo M; Ahn HS; Park SH; Lee JB; Choi BI; Sohn YM; Shin SY
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Jan; 37(1):99-109. PubMed ID: 28688156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A set of shear wave elastography quantitative parameters combined with ultrasound BI-RADS to assess benign and malignant breast lesions.
Shi XQ; Li JL; Wan WB; Huang Y
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 41(4):960-6. PubMed ID: 25701532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can measuring perilesional tissue stiffness and stiff rim sign improve the diagnostic performance between benign and malignant breast lesions?
Kong WT; Wang Y; Zhou WJ; Zhang YD; Wang WP; Zhuang XM; Wu M
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2021 Jan; 48(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 33439373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reproducibility and diagnostic performance of shear wave elastography in evaluating breast solid mass.
Hong S; Woo OH; Shin HS; Hwang SY; Cho KR; Seo BK
Clin Imaging; 2017; 44():42-45. PubMed ID: 28402836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of solid breast masses: determination of the most discriminatory parameter.
Au FW; Ghai S; Moshonov H; Kahn H; Brennan C; Dua H; Crystal P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W328-36. PubMed ID: 25148191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of tissue elasticity in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions using shear wave elastography.
Yang H; Xu Y; Zhao Y; Yin J; Chen Z; Huang P
BMC Cancer; 2020 Sep; 20(1):930. PubMed ID: 32993571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast Elasticity Imaging Techniques: Comparison of Strain Elastography and Shear-Wave Elastography in the Same Population.
Jia W; Luo T; Dong Y; Zhang X; Zhan W; Zhou J
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2021 Jan; 47(1):104-113. PubMed ID: 33109379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic performance of 2D-shear wave elastography in the diagnosis of breast cancer: a clinical appraisal of cutoff values.
Bartolotta TV; Orlando AAM; Dimarco M; Zarcaro C; Ferraro F; Cirino A; Matranga D; Vieni S; Cabibi D
Radiol Med; 2022 Nov; 127(11):1209-1220. PubMed ID: 36114930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic Performance of Multimodal Sound Touch Elastography for Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Masses.
Dong F; Wu H; Zhang L; Tian H; Liang W; Ye X; Liu Y; Xu J
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Aug; 38(8):2181-2190. PubMed ID: 30593673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ultrasound shear wave elastography of breast lesions: correlation of anisotropy with clinical and histopathological findings.
Chen YL; Gao Y; Chang C; Wang F; Zeng W; Chen JJ
Cancer Imaging; 2018 Apr; 18(1):11. PubMed ID: 29622044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic features of quantitative comb-push shear elastography for breast lesion differentiation.
Bayat M; Denis M; Gregory A; Mehrmohammadi M; Kumar V; Meixner D; Fazzio RT; Fatemi M; Alizad A
PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0172801. PubMed ID: 28257467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
