These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29059062)

  • 1. Forsus Appliance for Treatment of Class II, Division 2 Malocclusion in Adults.
    Patil HA; Kerudi VV; Patil NS; Sharan JS; Tekale PD
    J Clin Orthod; 2017 Jun; 51(6):347-352. PubMed ID: 29059062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Treatment of division II malocclusion in young adult with Forsus fatigue-resistant device.
    Krishna Nayak US; Goyal V
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):289-91. PubMed ID: 22945727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of Twin Force functional fixed orthopedic appliance in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Yamazaki MS; Rosário HD; El-Haje O; Alvim-Pereira F; Paranhos LR
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2014; 25(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 24812744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Treatment of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion with Forsus Fatigue Resistance Appliance and Its Re-activation by Using Custom-made Crimp.
    Aileni KR; Rachala MR; Dharmender SR; Rajesh V; Sandeep B
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2016; 27(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 27319039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breakages using a unilateral fixed functional appliance: a case report using The Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device.
    Ross AP; Gaffey BJ; Quick AN
    J Orthod; 2007 Mar; 34(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 17347290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative evaluation of treatment effects between two fixed functional appliances for correction of Class II malocclusion: A single-center, randomized controlled trial.
    Arora V; Sharma R; Chowdhary S
    Angle Orthod; 2018 May; 88(3):259-266. PubMed ID: 29517274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the effects of fixed and removable functional appliances on the skeletal and dentoalveolar structures.
    Bilgiç F; Hamamci O; Başaran G
    Aust Orthod J; 2011 Nov; 27(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 22372266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Early treatment of a severe Class II malocclusion with the Forsus fatigue resistant device.
    Goracci C; Cacciatore G
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2017 Sep; 18(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 29254343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Orthopedic treatment of dento-skeletal Class II by the association minivis + Forsus(TM): a clinical case].
    Pujol P
    Orthod Fr; 2014 Jun; 85(2):201-15. PubMed ID: 24923219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correction of a Overjet and Overbite In Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Using Twin Block Appliance Therapy: A Case Report.
    Shastri D; Tandon P; Singh GK; Singh A; Sharma S
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2015; 26(4):19-22. PubMed ID: 27029087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. RE: response to: treatment effects of the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device used with miniscrew anchorage. The Angle Orthodontist. 2014;84:76-87.
    Aslan B
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):934. PubMed ID: 25171583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device in Premolar-Extraction Treatment.
    Jung MH
    J Clin Orthod; 2015 Aug; 49(8):533-7. PubMed ID: 26332267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effective mechanics for vertical control with the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device.
    Jung MH
    J Clin Orthod; 2015 Jun; 49(6):378-87. PubMed ID: 26161834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The modified twin block appliance in the treatment of Class II division 2 malocclusions.
    Dyer FM; McKeown HF; Sandler PJ
    J Orthod; 2001 Dec; 28(4):271-80. PubMed ID: 11709592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Re: Aslan BI, Kucukkaraca E, Turkoz C, Dincer M. Treatment effects of the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device used with miniscrew anchorage. The Angle Orthodontist. 2014;84:76-87.
    Celikoglu M
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):933. PubMed ID: 25171582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Class II therapy with a combination of customized lingual appliances and the Forsus device.
    O'Keeffe C; O'Keeffe ME
    J Clin Orthod; 2013 Aug; 47(8):464-70. PubMed ID: 24121396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Functional appliance treatment of severe Class II malocclusion in the early mixed dentition.
    Cozza P; De Toffol L
    J Clin Orthod; 2003 Feb; 37(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 12674746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparision of Twin-block and Forsus (FRD) functional appliance--a cephalometric study.
    Mahamad IK; Neela PK; Mascarenhas R; Husain A
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2012; 23(3):49-58. PubMed ID: 23094559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A clip-on fixed-functional appliance.
    Malik OH; Read MJ
    J Clin Orthod; 2006 Sep; 40(9):542-7. PubMed ID: 17062905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The headgear: an effective functional appliance adjunct to treatment of the common Class II malocclusion in the adolescent--a clinical perspective.
    DeAngelis V
    J Mass Dent Soc; 2009; 58(1):28-30. PubMed ID: 19526912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.