BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29059597)

  • 1. Justification and authority in institutional review board decision letters.
    Clapp JT; Gleason KA; Joffe S
    Soc Sci Med; 2017 Dec; 194():25-33. PubMed ID: 29059597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A study of warning letters issued to institutional review boards by the United States Food and Drug Administration.
    Bramstedt KA; Kassimatis K
    Clin Invest Med; 2004 Dec; 27(6):316-23. PubMed ID: 15675112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Confidence of IRB/REC Members in Their Assessments of Human Research Risk: A Study of IRB/REC Decision Making in Action.
    Grinnell F; Sadler JZ; McNamara V; Senetar K; Reisch J
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Jul; 12(3):140-149. PubMed ID: 28558484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Written work: the social functions of Research Ethics Committee letters.
    Dixon-Woods M; Angell E; Ashcroft RE; Bryman A
    Soc Sci Med; 2007 Aug; 65(4):792-802. PubMed ID: 17490795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ethical and Practical Concerns about IRB Restrictions on the Use of Research Data.
    Barnes M; Carrithers J; Sugarman J
    Ethics Hum Res; 2020 Nov; 42(6):29-34. PubMed ID: 33136330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Doing accountability: a discourse analysis of research ethics committee letters.
    O'Reilly M; Dixon-Woods M; Angell E; Ashcroft R; Bryman A
    Sociol Health Illn; 2009 Mar; 31(2):246-61. PubMed ID: 18983419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Emergence of Clinical Research Ethics Consultation: Insights From a National Collaborative.
    Porter KM; Danis M; Taylor HA; Cho MK; Wilfond BS;
    Am J Bioeth; 2018 Jan; 18(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 29313771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ethics review of social, behavioral, and economic research: where should we go from here?
    De Vries R; DeBruin DA; Goodgame A
    Ethics Behav; 2004; 14(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 16625729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Research ethics committees: the role of ethics in a regulatory authority.
    McGuinness S
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Sep; 34(9):695-700. PubMed ID: 18757644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The development and acceptance of a simple tool to aid IRB compliance.
    Vulcano DM
    Qual Manag Health Care; 2012; 21(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 22722526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring IRB Regulatory Compliance: Development, Testing, and Use of the National Cancer Institute StART Tool.
    Rooney L; Covington L; Dedier A; Samuel B
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2019 Apr; 14(2):95-106. PubMed ID: 30866722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Review of multicenter studies by multiple institutional review boards: characteristics and outcomes for perinatal studies implemented by a multicenter network.
    Abramovici A; Salazar A; Edvalson T; Gallagher N; Dorman K; Tita A;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 212(1):110.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25088862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Uncertainty about effects is a key factor influencing institutional review boards' approval of clinical studies.
    Wao H; Mhaskar R; Kumar A; Miladinovic B; Guterbock T; Hozo I; Djulbegovic B
    Ann Epidemiol; 2014 Oct; 24(10):734-40. PubMed ID: 25108689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigators' successful strategies for working with Institutional Review Boards.
    Cartwright JC; Hickman SE; Nelson CA; Knafl KA
    Res Nurs Health; 2013 Oct; 36(5):478-86. PubMed ID: 23813748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Institutional review boards in Saudi Arabia: the first survey-based report on their functions and operations.
    AlFattani A; AlBedah N; AlShahrani A; Alkawi A; AlMeharish A; Altwaijri Y; Omar A; AlKawi MZ; Khogeer A
    BMC Med Ethics; 2023 Jul; 24(1):50. PubMed ID: 37430255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Operational Characteristics of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) in the United States.
    Nesom GL; Petrof I; Moore TM
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2019; 10(4):276-286. PubMed ID: 31618119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Understanding institutional review boards: practical guidance to the IRB review process.
    Pech C; Cob N; Cejka JT
    Nutr Clin Pract; 2007 Dec; 22(6):618-28. PubMed ID: 18042949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Site Variability in Regulatory Oversight for an International Study of Pediatric Sepsis.
    Michelson KN; Reubenson G; Weiss SL; Fitzgerald JC; Ackerman KK; Christie L; Bush JL; Nadkarni VM; Thomas NJ; Schreiner MS;
    Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2018 Apr; 19(4):e180-e188. PubMed ID: 29377867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of factors influencing the organizational capacity of Institutional Review Boards In China: a crisp-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis based on 107 cases.
    Lu L; Shi S; Liu B; Liu C
    BMC Med Ethics; 2023 Sep; 24(1):74. PubMed ID: 37749525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.