173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29060124)
1. Tomographic particle image velocimetry for the validation of hemodynamic simulations in an intracranial aneurysm.
Roloff C; Berg P; Redel T; Janiga G; Thevenin D
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2017 Jul; 2017():1340-1343. PubMed ID: 29060124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Computational Fluid Dynamics Rupture Challenge 2013--Phase II: Variability of Hemodynamic Simulations in Two Intracranial Aneurysms.
Berg P; Roloff C; Beuing O; Voss S; Sugiyama S; Aristokleous N; Anayiotos AS; Ashton N; Revell A; Bressloff NW; Brown AG; Chung BJ; Cebral JR; Copelli G; Fu W; Qiao A; Geers AJ; Hodis S; Dragomir-Daescu D; Nordahl E; Bora Suzen Y; Owais Khan M; Valen-Sendstad K; Kono K; Menon PG; Albal PG; Mierka O; Münster R; Morales HG; Bonnefous O; Osman J; Goubergrits L; Pallares J; Cito S; Passalacqua A; Piskin S; Pekkan K; Ramalho S; Marques N; Sanchi S; Schumacher KR; Sturgeon J; Švihlová H; Hron J; Usera G; Mendina M; Xiang J; Meng H; Steinman DA; Janiga G
J Biomech Eng; 2015 Dec; 137(12):121008. PubMed ID: 26473395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of intracranial aneurysm flow quantification techniques: standard PIV vs stereoscopic PIV vs tomographic PIV vs phase-contrast MRI vs CFD.
Roloff C; Stucht D; Beuing O; Berg P
J Neurointerv Surg; 2019 Mar; 11(3):275-282. PubMed ID: 30061369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Numerical simulations of flow in cerebral aneurysms: comparison of CFD results and in vivo MRI measurements.
Rayz VL; Boussel L; Acevedo-Bolton G; Martin AJ; Young WL; Lawton MT; Higashida R; Saloner D
J Biomech Eng; 2008 Oct; 130(5):051011. PubMed ID: 19045518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. PIV-measured versus CFD-predicted flow dynamics in anatomically realistic cerebral aneurysm models.
Ford MD; Nikolov HN; Milner JS; Lownie SP; Demont EM; Kalata W; Loth F; Holdsworth DW; Steinman DA
J Biomech Eng; 2008 Apr; 130(2):021015. PubMed ID: 18412502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Haemodynamics in a patient-specific intracranial aneurysm according to experimental and numerical approaches: A comparison of PIV, CFD and PC-MRI.
Li Y; Yoneyama Y; Isoda H; Terada M; Kosugi T; Kosugi T; Zhang M; Ohta M
Technol Health Care; 2021; 29(2):253-267. PubMed ID: 32568138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Complex flow patterns in a real-size intracranial aneurysm phantom: phase contrast MRI compared with particle image velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics.
van Ooij P; Guédon A; Poelma C; Schneiders J; Rutten MC; Marquering HA; Majoie CB; VanBavel E; Nederveen AJ
NMR Biomed; 2012 Jan; 25(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 21480417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy and reproducibility of patient-specific hemodynamic models of stented intracranial aneurysms: report on the Virtual Intracranial Stenting Challenge 2011.
Cito S; Geers AJ; Arroyo MP; Palero VR; Pallarés J; Vernet A; Blasco J; San Román L; Fu W; Qiao A; Janiga G; Miura Y; Ohta M; Mendina M; Usera G; Frangi AF
Ann Biomed Eng; 2015 Jan; 43(1):154-67. PubMed ID: 25118668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bringing hemodynamic simulations closer to the clinics: a CFD prototype study for intracranial aneurysms.
Berg P; Vos S; Becker M; Serowy S; Redel T; Janiga G; Skalej M; Beuing O
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():3302-3305. PubMed ID: 28269011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A pilot validation of CFD model results against PIV observations of haemodynamics in intracranial aneurysms treated with flow-diverting stents.
Li Y; Verrelli DI; Yang W; Qian Y; Chong W
J Biomech; 2020 Feb; 100():109590. PubMed ID: 31902608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A review on the reliability of hemodynamic modeling in intracranial aneurysms: why computational fluid dynamics alone cannot solve the equation.
Berg P; Saalfeld S; Voß S; Beuing O; Janiga G
Neurosurg Focus; 2019 Jul; 47(1):E15. PubMed ID: 31261119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of CFD simulations of cerebral aneurysms with implication of geometric variations.
Hoi Y; Woodward SH; Kim M; Taulbee DB; Meng H
J Biomech Eng; 2006 Dec; 128(6):844-51. PubMed ID: 17154684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computational fluid dynamics with stents: quantitative comparison with particle image velocimetry for three commercial off the shelf intracranial stents.
Bouillot P; Brina O; Ouared R; Yilmaz H; Lovblad KO; Farhat M; Mendes Pereira V
J Neurointerv Surg; 2016 Mar; 8(3):309-15. PubMed ID: 25603807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cerebral blood flow in a healthy Circle of Willis and two intracranial aneurysms: computational fluid dynamics versus four-dimensional phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging.
Berg P; Stucht D; Janiga G; Beuing O; Speck O; Thévenin D
J Biomech Eng; 2014 Apr; 136(4):. PubMed ID: 24292415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comprehensive validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations of in-vivo blood flow in patient-specific cerebral aneurysms.
Sun Q; Groth A; Aach T
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):742-54. PubMed ID: 22320784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inter-Laboratory Characterization of the Velocity Field in the FDA Blood Pump Model Using Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV).
Hariharan P; Aycock KI; Buesen M; Day SW; Good BC; Herbertson LH; Steinseifer U; Manning KB; Craven BA; Malinauskas RA
Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Dec; 9(4):623-640. PubMed ID: 30291585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative velocity investigations in cerebral arteries and aneurysms: 3D phase-contrast MR angiography, laser Doppler velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics.
Hollnagel DI; Summers PE; Poulikakos D; Kollias SS
NMR Biomed; 2009 Oct; 22(8):795-808. PubMed ID: 19412933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of blood viscosity models and boundary conditions on the computation of hemodynamic parameters in cerebral aneurysms using computational fluid dynamics.
Yang H; Hong I; Kim YB; Cho KC; Oh JH
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2023 Feb; 165(2):471-482. PubMed ID: 36624234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Flow-splitting-based computation of outlet boundary conditions for improved cerebrovascular simulation in multiple intracranial aneurysms.
Saalfeld S; Voß S; Beuing O; Preim B; Berg P
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2019 Oct; 14(10):1805-1813. PubMed ID: 31363984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Steady Flow in a Patient-Averaged Inferior Vena Cava-Part II: Computational Fluid Dynamics Verification and Validation.
Craven BA; Aycock KI; Manning KB
Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Dec; 9(4):654-673. PubMed ID: 30446978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
