237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29060274)
21. Therapeutic effects of a novel electrode for transcranial direct current stimulation in ischemic stroke mice.
Jung DH; Lee JH; Lee HJ; Park JW; Jung YJ; Shin HK; Choi BT
Theranostics; 2024; 14(4):1325-1343. PubMed ID: 38389833
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. High-resolution head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: A labeling analysis.
Thomas C; Huang Y; Faria PC; Datta A
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():6442-6445. PubMed ID: 31947317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Can individually targeted and optimized multi-channel tDCS outperform standard bipolar tDCS in stimulating the primary somatosensory cortex?
Khan A; Antonakakis M; Suntrup-Krueger S; Lencer R; Nitsche MA; Paulus W; Groß J; Wolters CH
Brain Stimul; 2023; 16(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 36526154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. An Operational Approach for Optimizing Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.
Xie X; Wang M; Qin L; Pan Y; Zhang S
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2023 Jul; 2023():1-4. PubMed ID: 38082713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Transcranial magnetic stimulation induces current pulses in transcranial direct current stimulation electrodes.
Peterchev AV; Dhamne SC; Kothare R; Rotenberg A
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():811-4. PubMed ID: 23366016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. High definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS): A systematic review on the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders.
Parlikar R; Vanteemar S S; Shivakumar V; Narayanaswamy C J; Rao P N; Ganesan V
Asian J Psychiatr; 2021 Feb; 56():102542. PubMed ID: 33486461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Transcranial direct current stimulation in patients after decompressive craniectomy: a finite element model to investigate factors affecting the cortical electric field.
Sun W; Dong X; Yu G; Shuai L; Yuan Y; Ma C
J Int Med Res; 2021 Feb; 49(2):300060520942112. PubMed ID: 33788619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of triangular electrode schemes on Broca's cortical stimulation: conventional and HD-tDCS study.
Amani A; Yousefian M; Seyedarabi H; Farhoudi M
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2021 Apr; 59(4):913-924. PubMed ID: 33786697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effects of Electrode Drift in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.
Woods AJ; Bryant V; Sacchetti D; Gervits F; Hamilton R
Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(3):515-9. PubMed ID: 25583653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Optimized APPS-tDCS electrode position, size, and distance doubles the on-target stimulation magnitude in 3000 electric field models.
Caulfield KA; George MS
Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):20116. PubMed ID: 36418438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Systematic evaluation of the impact of stimulation intensity on neuroplastic after-effects induced by transcranial direct current stimulation.
Jamil A; Batsikadze G; Kuo HI; Labruna L; Hasan A; Paulus W; Nitsche MA
J Physiol; 2017 Feb; 595(4):1273-1288. PubMed ID: 27723104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effects of High-Definition and Conventional tDCS on Response Inhibition.
Hogeveen J; Grafman J; Aboseria M; David A; Bikson M; Hauner KK
Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(5):720-729. PubMed ID: 27198577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Does participant's age impact on tDCS induced fields? Insights from computational simulations.
McCann H; Beltrachini L
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2021 Jun; 7(4):. PubMed ID: 34038881
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Dose-controlled tDCS reduces electric field intensity variability at a cortical target site.
Evans C; Bachmann C; Lee JSA; Gregoriou E; Ward N; Bestmann S
Brain Stimul; 2020; 13(1):125-136. PubMed ID: 31653475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improves Verb Recovery in Aphasic Patients Depending on Current Intensity.
Fiori V; Nitsche MA; Cucuzza G; Caltagirone C; Marangolo P
Neuroscience; 2019 May; 406():159-166. PubMed ID: 30876982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effects of Electrical Stimulation in Tinnitus Patients: Conventional Versus High-Definition tDCS.
Jacquemin L; Shekhawat GS; Van de Heyning P; Mertens G; Fransen E; Van Rompaey V; Topsakal V; Moyaert J; Beyers J; Gilles A
Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2018 Aug; 32(8):714-723. PubMed ID: 30019630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The effect of tissue anisotropy on the radial and tangential components of the electric field in transcranial direct current stimulation.
Metwally MK; Han SM; Kim TS
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2015 Oct; 53(10):1085-101. PubMed ID: 25940845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evidence of transcranial direct current stimulation-generated electric fields at subthalamic level in human brain in vivo.
Chhatbar PY; Kautz SA; Takacs I; Rowland NC; Revuelta GJ; George MS; Bikson M; Feng W
Brain Stimul; 2018; 11(4):727-733. PubMed ID: 29576498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Simulating transcranial direct current stimulation with a detailed anisotropic human head model.
Rampersad SM; Janssen AM; Lucka F; Aydin Ü; Lanfer B; Lew S; Wolters CH; Stegeman DF; Oostendorp TF
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2014 May; 22(3):441-52. PubMed ID: 24760939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Variation of cerebrospinal fluid in specific regions regulates focality in transcranial direct current stimulation.
Kashyap R; Bhattacharjee S; Bharath RD; Venkatasubramanian G; Udupa K; Bashir S; Oishi K; Desmond JE; Chen SHA; Guan C
Front Hum Neurosci; 2022; 16():952602. PubMed ID: 36118967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
