These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29060331)

  • 1. New conducted electrical weapons: Thoracic cage shielding effects.
    Panescu D; Kroll MW; Brave MA
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2017 Jul; 2017():2191-2196. PubMed ID: 29060331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. New conducted electrical weapons: Finite element modeling of safety margins.
    Panescu D; Kroll MW; Brave MA
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2017 Jul; 2017():2170-2176. PubMed ID: 29060327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The sternum as an electrical shield.
    Panescu D; Kroll M; Iverson C; Brave M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2014; 2014():4464-70. PubMed ID: 25570983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New conducted electrical weapons: Electrical safety relative to relevant standards.
    Panescu D; Nerheim M; Kroll MW; Brave MA
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2017 Jul; 2017():2185-2190. PubMed ID: 29060330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Medical safety of TASER conducted energy weapon in a hybrid 3-point deployment mode.
    Panescu D; Kroll MW; Stratbucker RA
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():3191-4. PubMed ID: 19964800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Current distribution in tissues with conducted electrical weapons operated in drive-stun mode.
    Panescu D; Kroll MW; Brave M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():5241-5245. PubMed ID: 28269446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrical safety of conducted electrical weapons relative to requirements of relevant electrical standards.
    Panescu D; Nerheim M; Kroll M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():5342-7. PubMed ID: 24110943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative study of conducted electrical weapon incapacitation during a goal-directed task.
    Ho J; Dawes DM; Kunz SN; Satpathy R; Klein L; Driver B; Stang JL
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2020 Dec; 16(4):613-621. PubMed ID: 32812174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrical Weapon Charge Delivery With Arcing.
    Chiles BD; Nerheim MH; Brave MA; Panescu D; Kroll MW
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():2234-2239. PubMed ID: 30440850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. TASER CEW distance determination for models X26P, X2, and TASER 7.
    Zhou YR; Liscio E; Ruffo HE; Doucette CM; Cao W
    Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Jan; 342():111520. PubMed ID: 36462472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cardiac fibrillation risks with TASER conducted electrical weapons.
    Panescu D; Kroll M; Brave M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015; 2015():323-9. PubMed ID: 26736265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transcardiac conducted electrical weapon (TASER) probe deployments: incidence and outcomes.
    Bozeman WP; Teacher E; Winslow JE
    J Emerg Med; 2012 Dec; 43(6):970-5. PubMed ID: 22674039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An evaluation of two conducted electrical weapons and two probe designs using a swine comparative cardiac safety model.
    Dawes DM; Ho JD; Moore JC; Miner JR
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2013 Sep; 9(3):333-42. PubMed ID: 23543462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of three conducted electrical weapons in a surrogate swine cardiac safety model.
    Dawes DM; Ho JD; Halperin HR; Fink SJ; Driver BE; Klein LR
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2021 Jan; 77():102088. PubMed ID: 33242742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A TASER conducted electrical weapon with cardiac biomonitoring capability: Proof of concept and initial human trial.
    Stopyra JP; Ritter SI; Beatty J; Johnson JC; Kleiner DM; Winslow JE; Gardner AR; Bozeman WP
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2016 Oct; 43():48-52. PubMed ID: 27448029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of Physiological Impedance from Neuromuscular Pulse Data.
    Chiles BD; Nerheim MH; Markle RC; Brave MA; Panescu D; Kroll MW
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2021 Nov; 2021():1246-1251. PubMed ID: 34891513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cardiac current density distribution by electrical pulses from TASER devices.
    Stratbucker RA; Kroll MW; McDaniel W; Panescu D
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():6305-7. PubMed ID: 17946756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An evaluation of two conducted electrical weapons using a swine comparative cardiac safety model.
    Dawes DM; Ho JD; Moore JC; Laudenbach AP; Reardon RF; Miner JR
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2014 Sep; 10(3):329-35. PubMed ID: 24895072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cardiac effects of varying pulse charge and polarity of TASER conducted electrical weapons.
    Kroll MW; Panescu D; Carver M; Kroll RM; Hinz AF
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():3195-8. PubMed ID: 19964054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Presenting rhythm in sudden deaths temporally proximate to discharge of TASER conducted electrical weapons.
    Swerdlow CD; Fishbein MC; Chaman L; Lakkireddy DR; Tchou P
    Acad Emerg Med; 2009 Aug; 16(8):726-39. PubMed ID: 19473120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.