These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29060433)

  • 21. [CTG: microfluctuation].
    Roemer VM
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2004 Dec; 208(6):210-9. PubMed ID: 15647984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A one-class approach to cardiotocogram assessment.
    Gavrilis D; Nikolakopoulos G; Georgoulas G
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015 Aug; 2015():518-21. PubMed ID: 26736313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Intrapartum heart rate ambiguity: a comparison of cardiotocogram and abdominal fetal electrocardiogram with maternal electrocardiogram.
    Reinhard J; Hayes-Gill BR; Schiermeier S; Hatzmann H; Heinrich TM; Louwen F
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2013; 75(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 23328351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Characteristics of fetal and maternal heart rate tracings during labor: A prospective observational study.
    Ramadan MK; Fasih R; Itani S; Salem Wehbe GR; Badr DA
    J Neonatal Perinatal Med; 2019; 12(4):405-410. PubMed ID: 31609705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Critical Imperative for the Reform of British Interpretation of Fetal Heart Rate Decelerations: Analysis of FIGO and NICE Guidelines, Post-Truth Foundations, Cognitive Fallacies, Myths and Occam's Razor.
    Sholapurkar SL
    J Clin Med Res; 2017 Apr; 9(4):253-265. PubMed ID: 28270884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessment of features for automatic CTG analysis based on expert annotation.
    Chudácek V; Spilka J; Lhotská L; Janku P; Koucký M; Huptych M; Bursa M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():6051-4. PubMed ID: 22255719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Longitudinal evaluation of computerized cardiotocographic parameters throughout pregnancy in normal fetuses: a prospective cohort study.
    Amorim-Costa C; Costa-Santos C; Ayres-de-Campos D; Bernardes J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Oct; 95(10):1143-52. PubMed ID: 27238561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Characteristics of Heart Rate Tracings in Preterm Fetus.
    Hurtado-Sánchez MF; Pérez-Melero D; Pinto-Ibáñez A; González-Mesa E; Mozas-Moreno J; Puertas-Prieto A
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 May; 57(6):. PubMed ID: 34070249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Fetal heart rate during labour: definitions and interpretation].
    Martin A
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Feb; 37 Suppl 1():S34-45. PubMed ID: 18191915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Basic principles of the foetal heart rate during delivery without hypoxia and acidosis.
    Roemer VM; Walden R
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2012 Feb; 216(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 22331523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The intrapartum CTG prior to neonatal encephalopathy at term: a case-control study.
    Spencer JA; Badawi N; Burton P; Keogh J; Pemberton P; Stanley F
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1997 Jan; 104(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 8988691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Antepartum cardiotocography: a study of fetal reactivity in frequency domain.
    Romano M; Bracale M; Cesarelli M; Campanile M; Bifulco P; De Falco M; Sansone M; Di Lieto A
    Comput Biol Med; 2006 Jun; 36(6):619-33. PubMed ID: 16005863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fetal heart rate tracings: observers versus computer assessment.
    Todros T; Preve CU; Plazzotta C; Biolcati M; Lombardo P
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1996 Sep; 68(1-2):83-6. PubMed ID: 8886686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Machine Learning to Classify Cardiotocography for Fetal Hypoxia Detection.
    Francis F; Luz S; Wu H; Townsend R; Stock SS
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2023 Jul; 2023():1-4. PubMed ID: 38083272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A mathematical model to simulate the cardiotocogram during labor. Part A: Model setup and simulation of late decelerations.
    Jongen GJ; van der Hout-van der Jagt MB; van de Vosse FN; Oei SG; Bovendeerd PH
    J Biomech; 2016 Aug; 49(12):2466-73. PubMed ID: 26921915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Linear and nonlinear parameters for the analysis of fetal heart rate signal from cardiotocographic recordings.
    Signorini MG; Magenes G; Cerutti S; Arduini D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Mar; 50(3):365-74. PubMed ID: 12669993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Relationship between computerized cardiotocography and perinatal outcomes].
    Liu W; Li X; Tang D
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Oct; 36(10):581-4. PubMed ID: 16134517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A mathematical model to simulate the cardiotocogram during labor. Part B: Parameter estimation and simulation of variable decelerations.
    Jongen GJ; van der Hout-van der Jagt MB; van de Vosse FN; Oei SG; Bovendeerd PH
    J Biomech; 2016 Aug; 49(12):2474-80. PubMed ID: 26920511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Interobserver agreement in analysis of cardiotocograms recorded during trial of labor after cesarean.
    Caning MM; Thisted DLA; Amer-Wählin I; Laier GH; Krebs L
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Nov; 32(22):3778-3783. PubMed ID: 29724142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The factor time in fetal heart rate monitoring and the detection of acidosis using the WAS score.
    Roemer VM; Walden R
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2014 Apr; 218(2):80-6. PubMed ID: 24788837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.