BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

407 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29061123)

  • 21. Genomic evaluation by including dominance effects and inbreeding depression for purebred and crossbred performance with an application in pigs.
    Xiang T; Christensen OF; Vitezica ZG; Legarra A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Nov; 48(1):92. PubMed ID: 27887565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Genomic selection of purebreds for crossbred performance.
    Ibánez-Escriche N; Fernando RL; Toosi A; Dekkers JC
    Genet Sel Evol; 2009 Jan; 41(1):12. PubMed ID: 19284703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Pedigree and genomic evaluation of pigs using a terminal-cross model.
    Tusell L; Gilbert H; Riquet J; Mercat MJ; Legarra A; Larzul C
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Apr; 48():32. PubMed ID: 27056443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparing genomic prediction accuracy from purebred, crossbred and combined purebred and crossbred reference populations in sheep.
    Moghaddar N; Swan AA; van der Werf JH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Sep; 46(1):58. PubMed ID: 25927315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessment of sire contribution and breed-of-origin of alleles in a three-way crossbred broiler dataset.
    Calus MPL; Vandenplas J; Hulsegge I; Borg R; Henshall JM; Hawken R
    Poult Sci; 2019 Dec; 98(12):6270-6280. PubMed ID: 31393589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Empirical and deterministic accuracies of across-population genomic prediction.
    Wientjes YC; Veerkamp RF; Bijma P; Bovenhuis H; Schrooten C; Calus MP
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):5. PubMed ID: 25885467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of linkage disequilibrium estimated from genotypes versus haplotypes for crossbred populations.
    Alemu SW; Bijma P; Calus MPL; Liu H; Fernando RL; Dekkers JCM
    Genet Sel Evol; 2022 Feb; 54(1):12. PubMed ID: 35135468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Estimation of dam line composition of 3-way crossbred animals using genomic information.
    Calus MPL; Henshall JM; Hawken R; Vandenplas J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2022 Jun; 54(1):44. PubMed ID: 35705918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Genomic prediction of crossbred performance based on purebred Landrace and Yorkshire data using a dominance model.
    Esfandyari H; Bijma P; Henryon M; Christensen OF; Sørensen AC
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):40. PubMed ID: 27276993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accuracy of genome-enabled prediction exploring purebred and crossbred pig populations.
    Veroneze R; Lopes MS; Hidalgo AM; Guimarães SE; Silva FF; Harlizius B; Lopes PS; Knol EF; M van Arendonk JA; Bastiaansen JW
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Oct; 93(10):4684-91. PubMed ID: 26523561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Segregation between breeds and local breed proportions in genetic and genomic models for crossbreds.
    Eiríksson JH; Su G; Strandén I; Christensen OF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Jul; 55(1):45. PubMed ID: 37407936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Genomic selection in admixed and crossbred populations.
    Toosi A; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Jan; 88(1):32-46. PubMed ID: 19749023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Genomic prediction in Nordic Red dairy cattle considering breed origin of alleles.
    Guillenea A; Su G; Lund MS; Karaman E
    J Dairy Sci; 2022 Mar; 105(3):2426-2438. PubMed ID: 35033341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Genomic prediction in pigs using data from a commercial crossbred population: insights from the Duroc x (Landrace x Yorkshire) three-way crossbreeding system.
    Liu S; Yao T; Chen D; Xiao S; Chen L; Zhang Z
    Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Mar; 55(1):21. PubMed ID: 36977978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Maximizing crossbred performance through purebred genomic selection.
    Esfandyari H; Sørensen AC; Bijma P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Mar; 47(1):16. PubMed ID: 25887297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Imputation of genotypes in Danish purebred and two-way crossbred pigs using low-density panels.
    Xiang T; Ma P; Ostersen T; Legarra A; Christensen OF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Jun; 47(1):54. PubMed ID: 26122927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Genomic evaluation for two-way crossbred performance in cattle.
    Mei Q; Liu H; Zhao S; Xiang T; Christensen OF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Mar; 55(1):17. PubMed ID: 36932324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Genomic predictions for crossbred dairy cattle.
    VanRaden PM; Tooker ME; Chud TCS; Norman HD; Megonigal JH; Haagen IW; Wiggans GR
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Feb; 103(2):1620-1631. PubMed ID: 31837783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Genetic evaluation for three-way crossbreeding.
    Christensen OF; Legarra A; Lund MS; Su G
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():98. PubMed ID: 26694257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Genomic selection of purebred animals for crossbred performance in the presence of dominant gene action.
    Zeng J; Toosi A; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Apr; 45(1):11. PubMed ID: 23621868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.