410 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29061123)
41. Genomic selection of purebred animals for crossbred performance in the presence of dominant gene action.
Zeng J; Toosi A; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Garrick DJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Apr; 45(1):11. PubMed ID: 23621868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Predicting the purebred-crossbred genetic correlation from the genetic variance components in the parental lines.
Duenk P; Bijma P; Wientjes YCJ; Calus MPL
Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Feb; 53(1):10. PubMed ID: 33541267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Genomic BLUP including additive and dominant variation in purebreds and F1 crossbreds, with an application in pigs.
Vitezica ZG; Varona L; Elsen JM; Misztal I; Herring W; Legarra A
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jan; 48():6. PubMed ID: 26825279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Genome-wide association study for carcass quality traits and growth in purebred and crossbred pigs1.
Bergamaschi M; Maltecca C; Fix J; Schwab C; Tiezzi F
J Anim Sci; 2020 Jan; 98(1):. PubMed ID: 31768540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Linkage disequilibrium patterns and persistence of phase in purebred and crossbred pig (Sus scrofa) populations.
Veroneze R; Bastiaansen JW; Knol EF; Guimarães SE; Silva FF; Harlizius B; Lopes MS; Lopes PS
BMC Genet; 2014 Nov; 15():126. PubMed ID: 25421851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Evaluating the use of statistical and machine learning methods for estimating breed composition of purebred and crossbred animals in thirteen cattle breeds using genomic information.
Ryan CA; Berry DP; O'Brien A; Pabiou T; Purfield DC
Front Genet; 2023; 14():1120312. PubMed ID: 37274789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Implementing a genomic rotational crossbreeding scheme to promote local dairy cattle breeds-A simulation study.
Stock J; Esfandyari H; Hinrichs D; Bennewitz J
J Dairy Sci; 2021 Jun; 104(6):6873-6884. PubMed ID: 33773793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Technical note: Genomic evaluation for crossbred performance in a single-step approach with metafounders.
Xiang T; Christensen OF; Legarra A
J Anim Sci; 2017 Apr; 95(4):1472-1480. PubMed ID: 28464109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Imputation of non-genotyped F1 dams to improve genetic gain in swine crossbreeding programs.
See GM; Fix JS; Schwab CR; Spangler ML
J Anim Sci; 2022 May; 100(5):. PubMed ID: 35451025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Balanced selection on purebred and crossbred performance increases gain in crossbreds.
Esfandyari H; Berg P; Sørensen AC
Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Mar; 50(1):8. PubMed ID: 29566647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Genomic prediction of simulated multibreed and purebred performance using observed fifty thousand single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes.
Kizilkaya K; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
J Anim Sci; 2010 Feb; 88(2):544-51. PubMed ID: 19820059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Growth performance for four breeds of swine: crossbred females and purebred and crossbred boars.
McLaren DG; Buchanan DS; Johnson RK
J Anim Sci; 1987 Jan; 64(1):99-108. PubMed ID: 3818493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Persistence of autozygosity in crossbreds between autochthonous and cosmopolitan breeds of swine: a simulation study.
Fabbri MC; Lozada-Soto E; Tiezzi F; Čandek-Potokar M; Bovo S; Schiavo G; Fontanesi L; Muñoz M; Ovilo C; Bozzi R
Animal; 2024 Feb; 18(2):101070. PubMed ID: 38401921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Genetic tests for estimating dairy breed proportion and parentage assignment in East African crossbred cattle.
Strucken EM; Al-Mamun HA; Esquivelzeta-Rabell C; Gondro C; Mwai OA; Gibson JP
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Sep; 49(1):67. PubMed ID: 28899355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Dissecting total genetic variance into additive and dominance components of purebred and crossbred pig traits.
Tusell L; Gilbert H; Vitezica ZG; Mercat MJ; Legarra A; Larzul C
Animal; 2019 Nov; 13(11):2429-2439. PubMed ID: 31120005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Optimal definition of contemporary groups for crossbred pigs in a joint purebred and crossbred genetic evaluation.
Steyn Y; Lourenco DA; Chen CY; Valente BD; Holl J; Herring WO; Misztal I
J Anim Sci; 2021 Jan; 99(1):. PubMed ID: 33313883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. SNP panels for the estimation of dairy breed proportion and parentage assignment in African crossbred dairy cattle.
Gebrehiwot NZ; Strucken EM; Marshall K; Aliloo H; Gibson JP
Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Mar; 53(1):21. PubMed ID: 33653262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Genome-wide association scan for heterotic quantitative trait loci in multi-breed and crossbred beef cattle.
Akanno EC; Chen L; Abo-Ismail MK; Crowley JJ; Wang Z; Li C; Basarab JA; MacNeil MD; Plastow GS
Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Oct; 50(1):48. PubMed ID: 30290764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Optimizing genomic reference populations to improve crossbred performance.
Wientjes YCJ; Bijma P; Calus MPL
Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Nov; 52(1):65. PubMed ID: 33158416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Comparison of joint versus purebred genomic evaluation in the French multi-breed dairy goat population.
Carillier C; Larroque H; Robert-Granié C
Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):67. PubMed ID: 25927866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
