BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29062655)

  • 1. Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.
    Highton L; Johnson R; Kirwan C; Murphy J
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2017 Sep; 5(9):e1488. PubMed ID: 29062655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prepectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction with complete ADM or synthetic mesh coverage - 36-Months follow-up in 200 reconstructed breasts.
    Reitsamer R; Peintinger F; Klaassen-Federspiel F; Sir A
    Breast; 2019 Dec; 48():32-37. PubMed ID: 31491673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with porcine acellular dermal matrix: a new technique for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy.
    Reitsamer R; Peintinger F
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Feb; 68(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 25455288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Meshed Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Prepectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction.
    Scheflan M; Allweis TM; Ben Yehuda D; Maisel Lotan A
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2020 Nov; 8(11):e3265. PubMed ID: 33299724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Early multicentre experience of pre-pectoral implant based immediate breast reconstruction using Braxon
    Jafferbhoy S; Chandarana M; Houlihan M; Parmeshwar R; Narayanan S; Soumian S; Harries S; Jones L; Clarke D
    Gland Surg; 2017 Dec; 6(6):682-688. PubMed ID: 29302486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Complication Rate of Prepectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction Using Human Acellular Dermal Matrices.
    Mangialardi ML; Salgarello M; Cacciatore P; Baldelli I; Raposio E
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2020 Dec; 8(12):e3235. PubMed ID: 33425578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Considerations for patient selection: Prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction.
    Yang JY; Kim CW; Lee JW; Kim SK; Lee SA; Hwang E
    Arch Plast Surg; 2019 Nov; 46(6):550-557. PubMed ID: 31775208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality of Life and Early Functional Evaluation in Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy: A Comparative Study Between Prepectoral Versus Dual-Plane Reconstruction.
    Caputo GG; Zingaretti N; Kiprianidis I; Zanfisi C; Domenici L; Parodi PC; Governa M
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2021 Aug; 21(4):344-351. PubMed ID: 33308993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correction of animation deformity with subpectoral to prepectoral implant exchange.
    Lentz R; Alcon A; Sbitany H
    Gland Surg; 2019 Feb; 8(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 30842931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction with Fenestrated Acellular Dermal Matrix: A Novel Design.
    Paydar KZ; Wirth GA; Mowlds DS
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2018 Apr; 6(4):e1712. PubMed ID: 29876165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acellular Dermal Matrix-sparing Direct-to-implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study Including Cost Analysis.
    Viezel-Mathieu A; Alnaif N; Aljerian A; Safran T; Brabant G; Boileau JF; Dionisopoulos T
    Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Feb; 84(2):139-143. PubMed ID: 31335468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Skin-Reducing Mastectomy with Immediate Prepectoral Reconstruction: Surgical, Aesthetic, and Patient-Reported Outcomes with and without Dermal Matrices.
    Safran T; Al-Halabi B; Viezel-Mathieu A; Boileau JF; Dionisopoulos T
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 May; 147(5):1046-1057. PubMed ID: 33835085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Early Functional Outcomes After Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Case-Matched Cohort Study.
    Schaeffer CV; Dassoulas KR; Thuman J; Campbell CA
    Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Jun; 82(6S Suppl 5):S399-S403. PubMed ID: 30570559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acellular bovine pericardium dermal matrix in immediate breast reconstruction after Skin Sparing Mastectomy.
    Gubitosi A; Docimo G; Parmeggiani D; Pirozzi R; Vitiello C; Schettino P; Avellino M; Casalino G; Amato M; Ruggiero R; Docimo L
    Int J Surg; 2014; 12 Suppl 1():S205-8. PubMed ID: 24859403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acellular dermal matrices as an adjunct to implant breast reconstruction: Analysis of outcomes and complications.
    Tasoulis MK; Teoh V; Khan A; Montgomery C; Mohammed K; Gui G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Apr; 46(4 Pt A):511-515. PubMed ID: 31706716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Breast Reconstruction Actualized in Nipple-sparing Mastectomy and Direct-to-implant, Prepectoral Polyurethane Positioning: Early Experience and Preliminary Results.
    de Vita R; Buccheri EM; Villanucci A; Pozzi M
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2019 Apr; 19(2):e358-e363. PubMed ID: 30691930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The P1 Method: Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction to Minimize the Palpable Implant Edge and Upper Pole Rippling.
    Pittman TA; Abbate OA; Economides JM
    Ann Plast Surg; 2018 May; 80(5):487-492. PubMed ID: 29489539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical outcome and patient satisfaction with the use of bovine-derived acellular dermal matrix (SurgiMend™) in implant based immediate reconstruction following skin sparing mastectomy: A prospective observational study in a single centre.
    Headon H; Kasem A; Manson A; Choy C; Carmichael AR; Mokbel K
    Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 25(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 27312036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prepectoral breast reconstruction with complete implant coverage using double-crossed acellular dermal matrixs.
    Lee JS; Kim JS; Lee JH; Lee JW; Lee J; Park HY; Yang JD
    Gland Surg; 2019 Dec; 8(6):748-757. PubMed ID: 32042683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.