157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29062727)
1. Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy for evidence-based diagnostic practice in Africa.
Ochodo EA; Leeflang MMG
Afr J Lab Med; 2012; 1(1):7. PubMed ID: 29062727
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Informant-based screening tools for diagnosis of dementia, an overview of systematic reviews of test accuracy studies protocol.
Taylor-Rowan M; Nafisi S; Patel A; Burton JK; Quinn TJ
Syst Rev; 2020 Nov; 9(1):271. PubMed ID: 33243282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic test accuracy: methods for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Campbell JM; Klugar M; Ding S; Carmody DP; Hakonsen SJ; Jadotte YT; White S; Munn Z
Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):154-62. PubMed ID: 26355602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies: The PRISMA-DTA Statement.
McInnes MDF; Moher D; Thombs BD; McGrath TA; Bossuyt PM; ; Clifford T; Cohen JF; Deeks JJ; Gatsonis C; Hooft L; Hunt HA; Hyde CJ; Korevaar DA; Leeflang MMG; Macaskill P; Reitsma JB; Rodin R; Rutjes AWS; Salameh JP; Stevens A; Takwoingi Y; Tonelli M; Weeks L; Whiting P; Willis BH
JAMA; 2018 Jan; 319(4):388-396. PubMed ID: 29362800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A methodological review of how heterogeneity has been examined in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy.
Dinnes J; Deeks J; Kirby J; Roderick P
Health Technol Assess; 2005 Mar; 9(12):1-113, iii. PubMed ID: 15774235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application of weighting methods for presenting risk-of-bias assessments in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies.
Vali Y; Leeflang MMG; Bossuyt PMM
Syst Rev; 2021 Jun; 10(1):191. PubMed ID: 34174958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic test accuracy of novel biomarkers for lupus nephritis-An overview of systematic reviews.
Guimarães JAR; Furtado SDC; Lucas ACDS; Mori B; Barcellos JFM
PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0275016. PubMed ID: 36215243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical utility of serologic testing for celiac disease in ontario: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(21):1-111. PubMed ID: 23074399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA).
McGrath TA; Moher D; McInnes MDF
Syst Rev; 2019 Jul; 8(1):166. PubMed ID: 31296260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measuring quality of reporting in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies in medical imaging: comparison of PRISMA-DTA and PRISMA.
Li Q; Hou W; Li L; Xu J; Ren Y; Zou K; Tian R; Sun X
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Feb; 61(2):257-266. PubMed ID: 36633905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Systematic reviews of diagnostic tests in endocrinology: an audit of methods, reporting, and performance.
Spencer-Bonilla G; Singh Ospina N; Rodriguez-Gutierrez R; Brito JP; Iñiguez-Ariza N; Tamhane S; Erwin PJ; Murad MH; Montori VM
Endocrine; 2017 Jul; 57(1):18-34. PubMed ID: 28585154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: Part 7: systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy studies.
Manchikanti L; Derby R; Wolfer L; Singh V; Datta S; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(6):929-63. PubMed ID: 19935980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measuring the impact of screening automation on meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy.
Norman CR; Leeflang MMG; Porcher R; Névéol A
Syst Rev; 2019 Oct; 8(1):243. PubMed ID: 31661028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Graphical presentation of diagnostic information.
Whiting PF; Sterne JA; Westwood ME; Bachmann LM; Harbord R; Egger M; Deeks JJ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2008 Apr; 8():20. PubMed ID: 18405357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Completeness of reporting for systematic reviews of point-of-care ultrasound: a meta-research study.
Prager R; Pratte M; Guy A; Bala S; Bachar R; Kim DJ; Millington S; Salameh JP; McGrath TA; McInnes MD
BMJ Evid Based Med; 2021 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 33785511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Defining the optimum strategy for identifying adults and children with coeliac disease: systematic review and economic modelling.
Elwenspoek MM; Thom H; Sheppard AL; Keeney E; O'Donnell R; Jackson J; Roadevin C; Dawson S; Lane D; Stubbs J; Everitt H; Watson JC; Hay AD; Gillett P; Robins G; Jones HE; Mallett S; Whiting PF
Health Technol Assess; 2022 Oct; 26(44):1-310. PubMed ID: 36321689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Recommendations for reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a systematic review.
McGrath TA; Alabousi M; Skidmore B; Korevaar DA; Bossuyt PMM; Moher D; Thombs B; McInnes MDF
Syst Rev; 2017 Oct; 6(1):194. PubMed ID: 29017574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gynaecologists blaze the trail in primary studies and systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy.
Johnson NP; Khan KS
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Feb; 49(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 19281584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High and unclear risk of bias assessments are predominant in diagnostic accuracy studies included in Cochrane reviews.
Di Girolamo N; Winter A; Meursinge Reynders R
J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Sep; 101():73-78. PubMed ID: 29777798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
