These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29063555)

  • 1. Representing Knowledge Consistently Across Health Systems.
    Rosenbloom ST; Carroll RJ; Warner JL; Matheny ME; Denny JC
    Yearb Med Inform; 2017 Aug; 26(1):139-147. PubMed ID: 29063555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automated production of research data marts from a canonical fast healthcare interoperability resource data repository: applications to COVID-19 research.
    Lenert LA; Ilatovskiy AV; Agnew J; Rudisill P; Jacobs J; Weatherston D; Deans KR
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2021 Jul; 28(8):1605-1611. PubMed ID: 33993254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Promoting national and international standards to build interoperable clinical applications.
    Haug PJ; Narus SP; Bledsoe J; Huff S
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2018; 2018():555-563. PubMed ID: 30815096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Archetype-based data warehouse environment to enable the reuse of electronic health record data.
    Marco-Ruiz L; Moner D; Maldonado JA; Kolstrup N; Bellika JG
    Int J Med Inform; 2015 Sep; 84(9):702-14. PubMed ID: 26094821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Data interchange using i2b2.
    Klann JG; Abend A; Raghavan VA; Mandl KD; Murphy SN
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2016 Sep; 23(5):909-15. PubMed ID: 26911824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ontology-based framework for electronic health records interoperability.
    González C; Blobel BG; López DM
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 169():694-8. PubMed ID: 21893836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Integration of Hospital Information and Clinical Decision Support Systems to Enable the Reuse of Electronic Health Record Data.
    Kopanitsa G
    Methods Inf Med; 2017 May; 56(3):238-247. PubMed ID: 28361157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Balancing Functionality versus Portability for SMART on FHIR Applications: Case Study for a Neonatal Bilirubin Management Application.
    Kukhareva P; Warner P; Rodriguez S; Kramer H; Weir C; Nanjo C; Shields D; Kawamoto K
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2019; 2019():562-571. PubMed ID: 32308850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electronic health record standards.
    Kalra D
    Yearb Med Inform; 2006; ():136-44. PubMed ID: 17051307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Representing knowledge, data and concepts for EHRS using DCM.
    Goossen W
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 169():774-8. PubMed ID: 21893852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Healthcare in the Age of Interoperability: Part 3.
    Braunstein ML
    IEEE Pulse; 2019; 10(1):26-29. PubMed ID: 30872211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A computable biomedical knowledge object for calculating in-hospital mortality for patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction.
    Sadsad R; Ruber G; Zhou J; Nicklin S; Tsafnat G
    Learn Health Syst; 2023 Oct; 7(4):e10388. PubMed ID: 37860059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CER Hub: An informatics platform for conducting comparative effectiveness research using multi-institutional, heterogeneous, electronic clinical data.
    Hazlehurst BL; Kurtz SE; Masica A; Stevens VJ; McBurnie MA; Puro JE; Vijayadeva V; Au DH; Brannon ED; Sittig DF
    Int J Med Inform; 2015 Oct; 84(10):763-73. PubMed ID: 26138036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Opening the Duke electronic health record to apps: Implementing SMART on FHIR.
    Bloomfield RA; Polo-Wood F; Mandel JC; Mandl KD
    Int J Med Inform; 2017 Mar; 99():1-10. PubMed ID: 28118917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Standards-based, open-source electronic health record systems: a desirable future for the U.S. health industry.
    Yellowlees PM; Marks SL; Hogarth M; Turner S
    Telemed J E Health; 2008 Apr; 14(3):284-8. PubMed ID: 18570554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A study of user requests regarding the fully electronic health record system at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital: challenges for future electronic health record systems.
    Yoo S; Kim S; Lee S; Lee KH; Baek RM; Hwang H
    Int J Med Inform; 2013 May; 82(5):387-97. PubMed ID: 22959193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Standardized exchange of clinical documents--towards a shared care paradigm in glaucoma treatment.
    Gerdsen F; Müller S; Jablonski S; Prokosch HU
    Methods Inf Med; 2006; 45(4):359-66. PubMed ID: 16964350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Julius--a template based supplementary electronic health record system.
    Chen R; Enberg G; Klein GO
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2007 May; 7():10. PubMed ID: 17474997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electronic health records and cardiac implantable electronic devices: new paradigms and efficiencies.
    Slotwiner DJ
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2016 Oct; 47(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 27585791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: a review of the research literature.
    Häyrinen K; Saranto K; Nykänen P
    Int J Med Inform; 2008 May; 77(5):291-304. PubMed ID: 17951106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.