These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29064378)

  • 1. Technical characterization of five x-ray detectors for paediatric radiography applications.
    Marshall NW; Smet M; Hofmans M; Pauwels H; De Clercq T; Bosmans H
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Nov; 62(24):N573-N586. PubMed ID: 29064378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. DQE of wireless digital detectors: comparative performance with differing filtration schemes.
    Samei E; Murphy S; Christianson O
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081910. PubMed ID: 23927324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characterization of noise sources for two generations of computed radiography systems using powder and crystalline photostimulable phosphors.
    Mackenzie A; Honey ID
    Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3345-57. PubMed ID: 17879798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Early experience in the use of quantitative image quality measurements for the quality assurance of full field digital mammography x-ray systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(18):5545-68. PubMed ID: 17804881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Image quality assessment in digital mammography: part I. Technical characterization of the systems.
    Marshall NW; Monnin P; Bosmans H; Bochud FO; Verdun FR
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jul; 56(14):4201-20. PubMed ID: 21701051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Investigation of image quality identification utilizing physical image quality measurement in direct- and indirect-type of flat panel detectors and computed radiography].
    Yokoi T; Takata T; Ichikawa K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(11):1415-25. PubMed ID: 22104233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Physical evaluation of a needle photostimulable phosphor based CR mammography system.
    Marshall NW; Lemmens K; Bosmans H
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):811-24. PubMed ID: 22320791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. NPWE model observer as a validated alternative for contrast detail analysis of digital detectors in general radiography.
    Van Peteghem N; Bosmans H; Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Nov; 61(21):N575-N591. PubMed ID: 27754987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Physical characterization of a novel wireless DRX Plus 3543C using both a carbon nano tube (CNT) mobile x-ray system and a traditional x-ray system.
    Nitrosi A; Bertolini M; Chendi A; Trojani V; Canovi L; Pattacini P; Iori M
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Jun; 65(11):11NT02. PubMed ID: 32311679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Technical Note: Impact on detective quantum efficiency of edge angle determination method by International Electrotechnical Commission methodology for cardiac x-ray image detectors.
    Gislason-Lee AJ; Tunstall CM; Kengyelics SK; Cowen AR; Davies AG
    Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4423-7. PubMed ID: 26233172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Seven general radiography x-ray detectors with pixel sizes ranging from 175 to 76
    Marshall NW; Vandenbroucke D; Cockmartin L; Wanninger F; Smet M; Feng Y; Ni Y; Bosmans H
    Phys Med Biol; 2023 Sep; 68(19):. PubMed ID: 37659394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Physical image properties of digital radiography systems in low dose range].
    Kunitomo H; Ichikawa K; Higashide R; Ohashi K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2012; 68(8):961-9. PubMed ID: 22975694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Imaging performance of the hybrid pixel detectors XPAD3-S.
    Brunner FC; Clemens JC; Hemmer C; Morel C
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Mar; 54(6):1773-89. PubMed ID: 19258683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Physical characteristics of five clinical systems for digital mammography.
    Lazzari B; Belli G; Gori C; Rosselli Del Turco M
    Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):2730-43. PubMed ID: 17821981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparative analysis of OTF, NPS, and DQE in energy integrating and photon counting digital x-ray detectors.
    Acciavatti RJ; Maidment AD
    Med Phys; 2010 Dec; 37(12):6480-95. PubMed ID: 21302803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterization of a clinical unit for digital radiography based on irradiation side sampling technology.
    Rivetti S; Lanconelli N; Bertolini M; Nitrosi A; Burani A
    Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101902. PubMed ID: 24089904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of digital radiography systems in terms of effective detective quantum efficiency.
    Bertolini M; Nitrosi A; Rivetti S; Lanconelli N; Pattacini P; Ginocchi V; Iori M
    Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2617-27. PubMed ID: 22559632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Technical assessment of 2D and 3D imaging performance of an IGZO-based flat-panel X-ray detector.
    Sheth NM; Uneri A; Helm PA; Zbijewski W; Siewerdsen JH
    Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):3053-3066. PubMed ID: 35363391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of cassette type on the DQE of CR systems.
    Monnin P; Holzer Z; Wolf R; Neitzel U; Vock P; Gudinchet F; Verdun FR
    Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3637-9. PubMed ID: 17089829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.