346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29064758)
1. A Comparison of Radiologists' and Urologists' Opinions Regarding Prostate MRI Reporting: Results From a Survey of Specialty Societies.
Spilseth B; Ghai S; Patel NU; Taneja SS; Margolis DJ; Rosenkrantz AB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jan; 210(1):101-107. PubMed ID: 29064758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiologists' preferences regarding content of prostate MRI reports: a survey of the Society of Abdominal Radiology.
Spilseth B; Margolis DJ; Ghai S; Patel NU; Rosenkrantz AB
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Jul; 43(7):1807-1812. PubMed ID: 29128994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evidence-Based Reporting: A Method to Optimize Prostate MRI Communications With Referring Physicians.
Magnetta MJ; Donovan AL; Jacobs BL; Davies BJ; Furlan A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jan; 210(1):108-112. PubMed ID: 29091009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Urologist Satisfaction for Different Types of Prostate MRI Reports: A Large Sample Investigation.
Zhong J; Qin W; Li Y; Wang Y; Huan Y; Ren J
Korean J Radiol; 2020 Dec; 21(12):1326-1333. PubMed ID: 32783410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System versions 1 and 2 for the Detection of Peripheral Zone Gleason Score 3 + 4 = 7 Cancers.
Krishna S; McInnes M; Lim C; Lim R; Hakim SW; Flood TA; Schieda N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Dec; 209(6):W365-W373. PubMed ID: 28981356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Current beliefs and practice patterns among urologists regarding prostate magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance-targeted biopsy.
Muthigi A; Sidana A; George AK; Kongnyuy M; Maruf M; Valayil S; Wood BJ; Pinto PA
Urol Oncol; 2017 Jan; 35(1):32.e1-32.e7. PubMed ID: 27743850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, Version 2, Assessment Categories and Pathologic Outcomes in Patients With Gleason Score 3 + 4 = 7 Prostate Cancer Diagnosed at Biopsy.
Lim CS; McInnes MDF; Flood TA; Breau RH; Morash C; Thornhill RE; Schieda N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 May; 208(5):1037-1044. PubMed ID: 28267359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ESUR/ESUI consensus statements on multi-parametric MRI for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: quality requirements for image acquisition, interpretation and radiologists' training.
de Rooij M; Israël B; Tummers M; Ahmed HU; Barrett T; Giganti F; Hamm B; Løgager V; Padhani A; Panebianco V; Puech P; Richenberg J; Rouvière O; Salomon G; Schoots I; Veltman J; Villeirs G; Walz J; Barentsz JO
Eur Radiol; 2020 Oct; 30(10):5404-5416. PubMed ID: 32424596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, Version 2, on MRI Diagnosis for Extracapsular Extension of Prostate Cancer.
Matsuoka Y; Ishioka J; Tanaka H; Kimura T; Yoshida S; Saito K; Fujii Y; Kihara K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Aug; 209(2):W76-W84. PubMed ID: 28570124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate: interpretation using the PI-RADS V2.
Torregrosa Andrés A; Otero García M; Sineiro Galiñanes M
Radiologia; 2017; 59(2):128-138. PubMed ID: 28012730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prostate needle biopsy reporting: how are the surgical members of the Society of Urologic Oncology using pathology reports to guide treatment of prostate cancer patients?
Rubin MA; Bismar TA; Curtis S; Montie JE
Am J Surg Pathol; 2004 Jul; 28(7):946-52. PubMed ID: 15223967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interreader Agreement of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 Using an In-Bore MRI-Guided Prostate Biopsy Cohort: A Single Institution's Initial Experience.
Glazer DI; Mayo-Smith WW; Sainani NI; Sadow CA; Vangel MG; Tempany CM; Dunne RM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Sep; 209(3):W145-W151. PubMed ID: 28657843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Structured reporting of prostate magnetic resonance imaging has the potential to improve interdisciplinary communication.
Wetterauer C; Winkel DJ; Federer-Gsponer JR; Halla A; Subotic S; Deckart A; Seifert HH; Boll DT; Ebbing J
PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0212444. PubMed ID: 30779810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reporting standards for the imaging-based diagnosis of renal masses on CT and MRI: a national survey of academic abdominal radiologists and urologists.
Davenport MS; Hu EM; Smith AD; Chandarana H; Hafez K; Palapattu GS; Stuart Wolf J; Silverman SG;
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Apr; 42(4):1229-1240. PubMed ID: 27878338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MRI of the Prostate in Germany: Online Survey among Radiologists.
Mueller-Lisse UG; Lewerich B; Mueller-Lisse UL; Reiser M; Scherr MK
Rofo; 2015 Aug; 187(8):703-11. PubMed ID: 26069149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective Evaluation of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for Prostate Cancer Detection.
Mertan FV; Greer MD; Shih JH; George AK; Kongnyuy M; Muthigi A; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Pinto PA; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
J Urol; 2016 Sep; 196(3):690-6. PubMed ID: 27101772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Systematic Review of the Existing Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 (PI-RADSv2) Literature and Subset Meta-Analysis of PI-RADSv2 Categories Stratified by Gleason Scores.
Barkovich EJ; Shankar PR; Westphalen AC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Apr; 212(4):847-854. PubMed ID: 30807218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy and Interobserver Agreement for Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, Version 2, for the Characterization of Lesions Identified on Multiparametric MRI of the Prostate.
Purysko AS; Bittencourt LK; Bullen JA; Mostardeiro TR; Herts BR; Klein EA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Aug; 209(2):339-349. PubMed ID: 28570099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The performance of PI-RADSv2 and quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient for predicting confirmatory prostate biopsy findings in patients considered for active surveillance of prostate cancer.
Nougaret S; Robertson N; Golia Pernicka J; Molinari N; Hötker AM; Ehdaie B; Sala E; Hricak H; Vargas HA
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Jul; 42(7):1968-1974. PubMed ID: 28258355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prostate MRI technical parameters standardization: A systematic review on adherence to PI-RADSv2 acquisition protocol.
Cuocolo R; Stanzione A; Ponsiglione A; Verde F; Ventimiglia A; Romeo V; Petretta M; Imbriaco M
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Nov; 120():108662. PubMed ID: 31539790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
