BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29065198)

  • 1. Disgust but not Health Anxiety Graphic Warning Labels Reduce Motivated Attention in Smokers: A Study of P300 and Late Positive Potential Responses.
    Cochran JR; Kydd RR; Lee JMJ; Walker N; Consedine NS
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2018 Jun; 20(7):819-826. PubMed ID: 29065198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Early onset cigarette smokers exhibit greater P300 reactivity to smoking-related stimuli and report greater craving.
    Mashhoon Y; Betts J; Farmer SL; Lukas SE
    Brain Res; 2018 May; 1687():173-184. PubMed ID: 29524436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. P3 event-related potential reactivity to smoking cues: Relations with craving, tobacco dependence, and alcohol sensitivity in young adult smokers.
    Piasecki TM; Fleming KA; Trela CJ; Bartholow BD
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2017 Feb; 31(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 27854454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implicit and explicit selective attention to smoking cues in smokers indexed by brain potentials.
    Littel M; Franken IH
    J Psychopharmacol; 2011 Apr; 25(4):503-13. PubMed ID: 20716580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Countering Craving with Disgust Images: Examining Nicotine Withdrawn Smokers' Motivated Message Processing of Anti-Tobacco Public Service Announcements.
    Clayton RB; Leshner G; Tomko RL; Trull TJ; Piasecki TM
    J Health Commun; 2017 Mar; 22(3):254-261. PubMed ID: 28248620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of negatively valenced words on deviant P3 during the three-stimulus oddball paradigm.
    Ishida M; Kaneda M; Akamine A; Sakakibara M
    Neurosci Lett; 2018 Sep; 683():38-42. PubMed ID: 29906482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cigarette cues capture attention of smokers and never-smokers, but for different reasons.
    Deweese MM; Codispoti M; Robinson JD; Cinciripini PM; Versace F
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2018 Apr; 185():50-57. PubMed ID: 29427915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Emotional graphic cigarette warning labels reduce the electrophysiological brain response to smoking cues.
    Wang AL; Romer D; Elman I; Turetsky BI; Gur RC; Langleben DD
    Addict Biol; 2015 Mar; 20(2):368-76. PubMed ID: 24330194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Smoking cessation policy and treatments derived from the protective motivation of smokers: a study on graphic health warning labels.
    Pang Q; Wang L; Yao J; Yuen KF; Su M; Fang M
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1205321. PubMed ID: 38022915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adolescent Attention to Disgust Visuals in Cigarette Graphic Warning Labels.
    Kemp D; Niederdeppe J; Byrne S
    J Adolesc Health; 2019 Dec; 65(6):769-775. PubMed ID: 31668454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conditioned cortical reactivity to cues predicting cigarette-related or pleasant images.
    Deweese MM; Robinson JD; Cinciripini PM; Versace F
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Mar; 101():59-68. PubMed ID: 26826400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of 12-h tobacco deprivation on event-related potentials elicited by visual smoking cues.
    McDonough BE; Warren CA
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2001 Mar; 154(3):282-91. PubMed ID: 11351935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The association between new graphic health warning labels on tobacco products and attitudes toward smoking among south Korean adolescents: a national cross-sectional study.
    Hwang JE; Cho SI
    BMC Public Health; 2020 May; 20(1):748. PubMed ID: 32448193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visuospatial information processing load and the ratio between parietal cue and target P3 amplitudes in the Attentional Network Test.
    Abramov DM; Pontes M; Pontes AT; Mourao-Junior CA; Vieira J; Quero Cunha C; Tamborino T; Galhanone PR; deAzevedo LC; Lazarev VV
    Neurosci Lett; 2017 Apr; 647():91-96. PubMed ID: 28336341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Event-related potentials reflecting smoking cue reactivity and cognitive control as predictors of smoking relapse and resumption.
    Luijten M; Kleinjan M; Franken IH
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2016 Aug; 233(15-16):2857-68. PubMed ID: 27277662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are blood-injection-injury stimuli different from other negative categories? An ERP study.
    Schäfer A; Scharmüller W; Leutgeb V; Köchel A; Schienle A
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Jul; 478(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 20470862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neural correlates of cigarette health warning avoidance among smokers.
    Stothart G; Maynard O; Lavis R; Munafò M
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2016 Apr; 161():155-62. PubMed ID: 26874916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Goal-driven attentional capture by appetitive and aversive smoking-related cues in nicotine-dependent smokers.
    Brown CRH; Forster S; Duka T
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2018 Sep; 190():209-215. PubMed ID: 30055425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intact motivated attention in schizophrenia: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Horan WP; Foti D; Hajcak G; Wynn JK; Green MF
    Schizophr Res; 2012 Mar; 135(1-3):95-9. PubMed ID: 22126898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cue reactivity in smokers: an event-related potential study.
    Bloom EL; Potts GF; Evans DE; Drobes DJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Nov; 90(2):258-64. PubMed ID: 23958866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.