195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29065614)
1. Development and Implementation of an End-Effector Upper Limb Rehabilitation Robot for Hemiplegic Patients with Line and Circle Tracking Training.
Liu Y; Li C; Ji L; Bi S; Zhang X; Huo J; Ji R
J Healthc Eng; 2017; 2017():4931217. PubMed ID: 29065614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modifying upper-limb inter-joint coordination in healthy subjects by training with a robotic exoskeleton.
Proietti T; Guigon E; Roby-Brami A; Jarrassé N
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 Jun; 14(1):55. PubMed ID: 28606179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rehabilitation for hemiplegia using an upper limb training system based on a force direction.
Ogata K; Hirabayashi Y; Kubota K; Hasegawa Y; Tsuji T
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():533-538. PubMed ID: 28813875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Human arm joints reconstruction algorithm in rehabilitation therapies assisted by end-effector robotic devices.
Bertomeu-Motos A; Blanco A; Badesa FJ; Barios JA; Zollo L; Garcia-Aracil N
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Feb; 15(1):10. PubMed ID: 29458397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A novel robot device in rehabilitation of post-stroke hemiplegic upper limbs.
Masiero S; Celia A; Armani M; Rosati G
Aging Clin Exp Res; 2006 Dec; 18(6):531-5. PubMed ID: 17255643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient's Healthy-Limb Motion Characteristic-Based Assist-As-Needed Control Strategy for Upper-Limb Rehabilitation Robots.
Guo B; Li Z; Huang M; Li X; Han J
Sensors (Basel); 2024 Mar; 24(7):. PubMed ID: 38610293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative Assessment of Motor Function for Patients with a Stroke by an End-Effector Upper Limb Rehabilitation Robot.
Liu Y; Song Q; Li C; Guan X; Ji L
Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():5425741. PubMed ID: 32462001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of complementing a robotic upper limb rehabilitation system with video games on the engagement of the participants: a study focusing on muscle activities.
Li C; Rusák Z; Horváth I; Ji L
Int J Rehabil Res; 2014 Dec; 37(4):334-42. PubMed ID: 25221845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A review of technological and clinical aspects of robot-aided rehabilitation of upper-extremity after stroke.
Babaiasl M; Mahdioun SH; Jaryani P; Yazdani M
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2016; 11(4):263-80. PubMed ID: 25600057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper extremity function and activities of daily living in hemiplegic patients: A single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial.
Lee MJ; Lee JH; Lee SM
Technol Health Care; 2018; 26(4):659-666. PubMed ID: 30124459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of robot-aided bilateral force-induced isokinetic arm training combined with conventional rehabilitation on arm motor function in patients with chronic stroke.
Chang JJ; Tung WL; Wu WL; Huang MH; Su FC
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Oct; 88(10):1332-8. PubMed ID: 17908578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic-assisted rehabilitation of the upper limb after acute stroke.
Masiero S; Celia A; Rosati G; Armani M
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Feb; 88(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 17270510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation on daily function and real-world arm activity in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial.
Liao WW; Wu CY; Hsieh YW; Lin KC; Chang WY
Clin Rehabil; 2012 Feb; 26(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 21840917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Exerciser for rehabilitation of the Arm (ERA): Development and unique features of a 3D end-effector robot.
Milot MH; Hamel M; Provost PO; Bernier-Ouellet J; Dupuis M; Letourneau D; Briere S; Michaud F
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():5833-5836. PubMed ID: 28269581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Self-powered robots to reduce motor slacking during upper-extremity rehabilitation: a proof of concept study.
Washabaugh EP; Treadway E; Gillespie RB; Remy CD; Krishnan C
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2018; 36(6):693-708. PubMed ID: 30400120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Design and analysis of a compatible exoskeleton rehabilitation robot system based on upper limb movement mechanism.
Ning Y; Wang H; Liu Y; Wang Q; Rong Y; Niu J
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2024 Mar; 62(3):883-899. PubMed ID: 38081953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. System Framework of Robotics in Upper Limb Rehabilitation on Poststroke Motor Recovery.
Zhang K; Chen X; Liu F; Tang H; Wang J; Wen W
Behav Neurol; 2018; 2018():6737056. PubMed ID: 30651892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of the effects and usability of two exoskeletal robots with and without robotic actuation for upper extremity rehabilitation among patients with stroke: a single-blinded randomised controlled pilot study.
Park JH; Park G; Kim HY; Lee JY; Ham Y; Hwang D; Kwon S; Shin JH
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2020 Oct; 17(1):137. PubMed ID: 33076952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the effects of the Arm Light Exoskeleton on movement execution and muscle activities: a pilot study on healthy subjects.
Pirondini E; Coscia M; Marcheschi S; Roas G; Salsedo F; Frisoli A; Bergamasco M; Micera S
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2016 Jan; 13():9. PubMed ID: 26801620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Design and kinematical performance analysis of the 7-DOF upper-limb exoskeleton toward improving human-robot interface in active and passive movement training.
Meng Q; Fei C; Jiao Z; Xie Q; Dai Y; Fan Y; Shen Z; Yu H
Technol Health Care; 2022; 30(5):1167-1182. PubMed ID: 35342067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
