These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29066266)

  • 1. Cross Pin Versus Interference Screw for Femoral Graft Fixation in Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical Outcomes.
    Hu B; Shen W; Zhou C; Meng J; Wu H; Yan S
    Arthroscopy; 2018 Feb; 34(2):615-623. PubMed ID: 29066266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Press-fit fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction yields low graft failure and revision rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Shanmugaraj A; Mahendralingam M; Gohal C; Horner N; Simunovic N; Musahl V; Samuelsson K; Ayeni OR
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2021 Jun; 29(6):1750-1759. PubMed ID: 32785757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anterior Laxity at 2 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is Comparable When Using Adjustable-Loop Suspensory Fixation and Interference Screw Fixation.
    Boutsiadis A; Panisset JC; Devitt BM; Mauris F; Barthelemy R; Barth J
    Am J Sports Med; 2018 Aug; 46(10):2366-2375. PubMed ID: 30015501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cortical Button Versus Cross-pin Femoral Fixation for Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Jiang H; Ma G; Li Q; Hu Y; Li J; Tang X
    Am J Sports Med; 2018 Jul; 46(9):2277-2284. PubMed ID: 28753392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intratunnel versus extratunnel autologous hamstring double-bundle graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of 2 femoral fixation procedures.
    Ibrahim SA; Abdul Ghafar S; Marwan Y; Mahgoub AM; Al Misfer A; Farouk H; Wagdy M; Alherran H; Khirait S
    Am J Sports Med; 2015 Jan; 43(1):161-8. PubMed ID: 25349264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ACL reconstruction with quadriceps tendon graft and press-fit fixation versus quadruple hamstring graft and interference screw fixation - a matched pair analysis after one year follow up.
    Akoto R; Albers M; Balke M; Bouillon B; Höher J
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Mar; 20(1):109. PubMed ID: 30871508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bioabsorbable versus metallic interference screws for graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
    Debieux P; Franciozi CE; Lenza M; Tamaoki MJ; Magnussen RA; Faloppa F; Belloti JC
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Jul; 7(7):CD009772. PubMed ID: 27450741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical results of hamstring autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of femoral knot/press-fit fixation and interference screw fixation.
    Ho WP; Lee CH; Huang CH; Chen CH; Chuang TY
    Arthroscopy; 2014 Jul; 30(7):823-32. PubMed ID: 24768467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Femoral fixation methods for hamstring graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A network meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials.
    Nie S; Zhou S; Huang W
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0275097. PubMed ID: 36137116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interference screws are more likely to perform better than cortical button and cross-pin fixation for hamstring autograft in ACL reconstruction: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.
    Yan L; Li JJ; Zhu Y; Liu H; Liu R; Zhao B; Wang B
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2021 Jun; 29(6):1850-1861. PubMed ID: 32813044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cross-pin femoral fixation versus metal interference screw fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendons: results of a controlled prospective randomized study with 2-year follow-up.
    Harilainen A; Sandelin J; Jansson KA
    Arthroscopy; 2005 Jan; 21(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 15650663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing Hamstring Autograft With Hybrid Graft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.
    Belk JW; Kraeutler MJ; Houck DA; Smith JR; McCarty EC
    Arthroscopy; 2020 Apr; 36(4):1189-1201. PubMed ID: 31919024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative Risk-Benefit Profiles of Individual Devices for Graft Fixation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.
    Wang Y; Lei G; Zeng C; Wei J; He H; Li X; Zhu Z; Wang H; Wu Z; Wang N; Ding X; Li H
    Arthroscopy; 2020 Jul; 36(7):1953-1972. PubMed ID: 32360701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using a Hybrid Graft Versus a Hamstring Autograft.
    Wang HD; Gao SJ; Zhang YZ
    Arthroscopy; 2018 May; 34(5):1508-1516. PubMed ID: 29287949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft could be recommended as a superior graft to hamstring autograft for ACL reconstruction in patients with generalized joint laxity: 2- and 5-year follow-up study.
    Kim SJ; Choi CH; Kim SH; Lee SK; Lee W; Kim T; Jung M
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 Sep; 26(9):2568-2579. PubMed ID: 29502168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Systemic Review of Anatomic Single- Versus Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Does Femoral Tunnel Drilling Technique Matter?
    Zhang Y; Xu C; Dong S; Shen P; Su W; Zhao J
    Arthroscopy; 2016 Sep; 32(9):1887-904. PubMed ID: 27184099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bioabsorbable interference screw versus bioabsorbable cross pins: influence of femoral graft fixation on the clinical outcome after ACL reconstruction.
    Frosch S; Rittstieg A; Balcarek P; Walde TA; Schüttrumpf JP; Wachowski MM; Stürmer KM; Frosch KH
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2012 Nov; 20(11):2251-6. PubMed ID: 22290125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A randomized prospective controlled study with 5-year follow-up of cross-pin femoral fixation versus metal interference screw fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
    Björkman P; Sandelin J; Harilainen A
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2015 Aug; 23(8):2353-2359. PubMed ID: 24832696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. No difference in clinical results between femoral transfixation and bio-interference screw fixation in hamstring tendon ACL reconstruction. A preliminary study.
    Capuano L; Hardy P; Longo UG; Denaro V; Maffulli N
    Knee; 2008 Jun; 15(3):174-9. PubMed ID: 18367398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Knee laxity in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : The influence of graft rotation using interference screw fixation].
    Offerhaus C; Balke M; Braas M; Pennig D; Gick S; Höher J
    Orthopade; 2015 Mar; 44(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 25749430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.