These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29066294)

  • 1. Semi-parametric arterial input functions for quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in mice.
    Taxt T; Reed RK; Pavlin T; Rygh CB; Andersen E; Jiřík R
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Feb; 46():10-20. PubMed ID: 29066294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Blind deconvolution estimation of an arterial input function for small animal DCE-MRI.
    Jiřík R; Taxt T; Macíček O; Bartoš M; Kratochvíla J; Souček K; Dražanová E; Krátká L; Hampl A; Starčuk Z
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Oct; 62():46-56. PubMed ID: 31150814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Repeatability of arterial input functions and kinetic parameters in muscle obtained by dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging of the head and neck.
    Koopman T; Martens RM; Lavini C; Yaqub M; Castelijns JA; Boellaard R; Marcus JT
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 May; 68():1-8. PubMed ID: 31978517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improved reliability of perfusion estimation in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI by using the arterial input function from dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.
    Tseng CH; Jaspers J; Romero AM; Wielopolski P; Smits M; van Osch MJP; Vos F
    NMR Biomed; 2024 Jan; 37(1):e5038. PubMed ID: 37712359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of two methods for estimating DCE-MRI parameters via individual and cohort based AIFs in prostate cancer: a step towards practical implementation.
    Fedorov A; Fluckiger J; Ayers GD; Li X; Gupta SN; Tempany C; Mulkern R; Yankeelov TE; Fennessy FM
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 May; 32(4):321-9. PubMed ID: 24560287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of repeatability and treatment response in early phase clinical trials using DCE-MRI: comparison of parametric analysis using MR- and CT-derived arterial input functions.
    Rata M; Collins DJ; Darcy J; Messiou C; Tunariu N; Desouza N; Young H; Leach MO; Orton MR
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Jul; 26(7):1991-8. PubMed ID: 26385804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A model-constrained Monte Carlo method for blind arterial input function estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: II. In vivo results.
    Schabel MC; DiBella EV; Jensen RL; Salzman KL
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4807-23. PubMed ID: 20679695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parametric mapping using high spatiotemporal resolution Golden-angle RAdial Sparse Parallel MRI and iterative joint estimation of the arterial input function and pharmacokinetic parameters.
    Mazaheri Y; Kim N; Lakhman Y; Jafari R; Vargas A; Otazo R
    NMR Biomed; 2022 Jul; 35(7):e4718. PubMed ID: 35226774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study.
    Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distributed capillary adiabatic tissue homogeneity model in parametric multi-channel blind AIF estimation using DCE-MRI.
    Kratochvíla J; Jiřík R; Bartoš M; Standara M; Starčuk Z; Taxt T
    Magn Reson Med; 2016 Mar; 75(3):1355-65. PubMed ID: 25865576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of arterial input function selection on the accuracy of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI quantitative analysis for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Azahaf M; Haberlay M; Betrouni N; Ernst O; Behal H; Duhamel A; Ouzzane A; Puech P
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Mar; 43(3):737-49. PubMed ID: 26303794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Single-channel blind estimation of arterial input function and tissue impulse response in DCE-MRI.
    Taxt T; Jirík R; Rygh CB; Grüner R; Bartos M; Andersen E; Curry FR; Reed RK
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Apr; 59(4):1012-21. PubMed ID: 22217906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Single voxel vascular transport functions of arteries, capillaries and veins; and the associated arterial input function in dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance brain perfusion imaging.
    Taxt T; Andersen E; Jiřík R
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Dec; 84():101-114. PubMed ID: 34461158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A model-constrained Monte Carlo method for blind arterial input function estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: I. Simulations.
    Schabel MC; Fluckiger JU; DiBella EV
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4783-806. PubMed ID: 20679691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of DCE-MRI parameters for brain tumors through implementation of physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model approaches for Gd-DOTA.
    Spanakis M; Kontopodis E; Van Cauter S; Sakkalis V; Marias K
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2016 Oct; 43(5):529-47. PubMed ID: 27647272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A novel AIF tracking method and comparison of DCE-MRI parameters using individual and population-based AIFs in human breast cancer.
    Li X; Welch EB; Arlinghaus LR; Chakravarthy AB; Xu L; Farley J; Loveless ME; Mayer IA; Kelley MC; Meszoely IM; Means-Powell JA; Abramson VG; Grau AM; Gore JC; Yankeelov TE
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Sep; 56(17):5753-69. PubMed ID: 21841212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A simulation study comparing nine mathematical models of arterial input function for dynamic contrast enhanced MRI to the Parker model.
    He D; Xu L; Qian W; Clarke J; Fan X
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2018 Jun; 41(2):507-518. PubMed ID: 29569210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pharmacokinetic analysis of prostate cancer using independent component analysis.
    Mehrabian H; Da Rosa M; Haider MA; Martel AL
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Dec; 33(10):1236-1245. PubMed ID: 26297961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative pharmacokinetic analysis of DCE-MRI data without an arterial input function: a reference region model.
    Yankeelov TE; Luci JJ; Lepage M; Li R; Debusk L; Lin PC; Price RR; Gore JC
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 May; 23(4):519-29. PubMed ID: 15919597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving the arterial input function in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI by fitting the signal in the complex plane.
    Simonis FF; Sbrizzi A; Beld E; Lagendijk JJ; van den Berg CA
    Magn Reson Med; 2016 Oct; 76(4):1236-45. PubMed ID: 26525012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.