146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29066522)
1. Development and progress of the National Congenital Anomaly and Rare Disease Registration Service.
Stevens S; Miller N; Rashbass J
Arch Dis Child; 2018 Mar; 103(3):215-217. PubMed ID: 29066522
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the National Congenital Anomaly System in England and Wales.
Platt MW
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2005 Sep; 90(5):F354. PubMed ID: 16113148
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Congenital anomaly surveillance in England--ascertainment deficiencies in the national system.
Boyd PA; Armstrong B; Dolk H; Botting B; Pattenden S; Abramsky L; Rankin J; Vrijheid M; Wellesley D
BMJ; 2005 Jan; 330(7481):27. PubMed ID: 15561730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the National Congenital Anomaly System in England and Wales.
Misra T; Dattani N; Majeed A
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2005 Sep; 90(5):F368-73. PubMed ID: 16113152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An evaluation of congenital malformations surveillance in New York State: an application of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for evaluating surveillance systems.
Sekhobo JP; Druschel CM
Public Health Rep; 2001; 116(4):296-305. PubMed ID: 12037258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cohort profile: the National Congenital Anomaly Registration Dataset in England.
Broughan JM; Wreyford B; Martin D; Melis G; Randall K; Obaro E; Broggio J; Aldridge N; Stoianova S; Johnson C; Gibbard D; Stevens S; Fleming KM
BMJ Open; 2024 Jan; 14(1):e077743. PubMed ID: 38216203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patient registries: utility, validity and inference.
Richesson R; Vehik K
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2010; 686():87-104. PubMed ID: 20824441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prevalence Estimates of Rare Congenital Anomalies by Integrating Two Population-Based Registries in Tuscany, Italy.
Coi A; Santoro M; Pierini A; Marrucci S; Pieroni F; Bianchi F
Public Health Genomics; 2017; 20(4):229-234. PubMed ID: 29045944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Methodological issues in setting up a surveillance system for birth defects in India.
Suresh S; Thangavel G; Sujatha J; Indrani S
Natl Med J India; 2005; 18(5):259-62. PubMed ID: 16433142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Evaluation of registries of congenital anomalies in 9 selected provinces].
Mikiel-Kostyra K; Komorowski K; Borkowski W; Gałecki A
Pediatr Pol; 1987 Mar; 62(3):161-6. PubMed ID: 3658560
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Population-based surveillance for rare congenital and inherited disorders: models and challenges.
Jackson JM; Crider KS; Olney RS
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2010; 686():133-50. PubMed ID: 20824444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A survey of handicap registers for pre-school children in England and Wales.
Balarajan R; Weatherall JA; Ashley JS; Bewley BR
Community Med; 1982 Nov; 4(4):315-24. PubMed ID: 6217945
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Registries of congenital anomalies: EUROCAT.
Lechat MF; Dolk H
Environ Health Perspect; 1993 Jul; 101 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):153-7. PubMed ID: 8243386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Congenital anomaly surveillance in England and Wales.
Misra T; Dattani N; Majeed A
Public Health; 2006 Mar; 120(3):256-64. PubMed ID: 16337977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictive value and completeness of the registration of congenital abnormalities in three Danish population-based registries.
Larsen H; Nielsen GL; Bendsen J; Flint C; Olsen J; Sørensen HT
Scand J Public Health; 2003; 31(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 12623519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measuring morbidity in a population: the British Columbia Health Surveillance Registry.
Colls MH; Baird PA; Gibson DL
Can J Public Health; 1982; 73(5):313-8. PubMed ID: 7172144
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Registry to referral: using birth defects registries to refer infants and toddlers for early intervention services.
Farel AM; Meyer RE; Hicken M; Edmonds LD
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2003 Sep; 67(9):647-50. PubMed ID: 14703788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The National Congenital Anomaly System--why it needs midwives' support.
Coleridge HL
RCM Midwives J; 2002 May; 5(5):188-9. PubMed ID: 12046193
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Developing a birth defects registry for Tennessee.
Van Cleave ML
J Tenn Med Assoc; 1994 Feb; 87(2):60-1. PubMed ID: 8176916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Congenital anomalies in Switzerland: problems and solutions in data collection and their European integration experiences by Eurocat (Switzerland).
Pexieder T; Bloch D
Soz Praventivmed; 1994; 39(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 8147119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
