These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29067159)

  • 1. Null hypothesis significance testing: a short tutorial.
    Pernet C
    F1000Res; 2015; 4():621. PubMed ID: 29067159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fisher, Neyman-Pearson or NHST? A tutorial for teaching data testing.
    Perezgonzalez JD
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():223. PubMed ID: 25784889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical inference in abstracts of major medical and epidemiology journals 1975-2014: a systematic review.
    Stang A; Deckert M; Poole C; Rothman KJ
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2017 Jan; 32(1):21-29. PubMed ID: 27858205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The continuing misuse of null hypothesis significance testing in biological anthropology.
    Smith RJ
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2018 May; 166(1):236-245. PubMed ID: 29345299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Statistical inferences under the Null hypothesis: common mistakes and pitfalls in neuroimaging studies.
    Hupé JM
    Front Neurosci; 2015; 9():18. PubMed ID: 25745383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In support of null hypothesis significance testing.
    Mogie M
    Proc Biol Sci; 2004 Feb; 271 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S82-4. PubMed ID: 15101426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A logical analysis of null hypothesis significance testing using popular terminology.
    McNulty R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Sep; 22(1):244. PubMed ID: 36123631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The reporting of
    Messam LLM; Weng HY; Rosenberger NWY; Tan ZH; Payet SDM; Santbakshsing M
    PeerJ; 2021; 9():e12453. PubMed ID: 34900418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating statistical difference, equivalence, and indeterminacy using inferential confidence intervals: an integrated alternative method of conducting null hypothesis statistical tests.
    Tryon WW
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):371-86. PubMed ID: 11778678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Moving Beyond p < 0.05 in Ecotoxicology: A Guide for Practitioners.
    Erickson RA; Rattner BA
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2020 Sep; 39(9):1657-1669. PubMed ID: 32539165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neuroscience Needs to Test Both Statistical and Scientific Hypotheses.
    Alger BE
    J Neurosci; 2022 Nov; 42(45):8432-8438. PubMed ID: 36351823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The null hypothesis significance test in health sciences research (1995-2006): statistical analysis and interpretation.
    Silva-Ayçaguer LC; Suárez-Gil P; Fernández-Somoano A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 May; 10():44. PubMed ID: 20482841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of criticism of null-hypothesis significance testing on statistical reporting practices in conservation biology.
    Fidler F; Burgman MA; Cumming G; Buttrose R; Thomason N
    Conserv Biol; 2006 Oct; 20(5):1539-44. PubMed ID: 17002771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Thou Shalt Not Bear False Witness Against Null Hypothesis Significance Testing.
    García-Pérez MA
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2017 Aug; 77(4):631-662. PubMed ID: 30034024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The researcher and the consultant: a dialogue on null hypothesis significance testing.
    Stang A; Poole C
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2013 Dec; 28(12):939-44. PubMed ID: 24233192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing.
    Masson ME
    Behav Res Methods; 2011 Sep; 43(3):679-90. PubMed ID: 21302025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Dilemma of null hypothesis in ecological hypothesis's experiment test.].
    Li J
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2016 Jun; 27(6):2031-2038. PubMed ID: 29737714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Current controversies: Null hypothesis significance testing.
    Sedgwick PM; Hammer A; Kesmodel US; Pedersen LH
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Jun; 101(6):624-627. PubMed ID: 35451497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. P > .05: The incorrect interpretation of "not significant" results is a significant problem.
    Smith RJ
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2020 Aug; 172(4):521-527. PubMed ID: 32570289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Statistical Significance Versus Clinical Importance of Observed Effect Sizes: What Do P Values and Confidence Intervals Really Represent?
    Schober P; Bossers SM; Schwarte LA
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Mar; 126(3):1068-1072. PubMed ID: 29337724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.