145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29067219)
1. Driving with Hemianopia V: Do Individuals with Hemianopia Spontaneously Adapt Their Gaze Scanning to Differing Hazard Detection Demands?
Alberti CF; Goldstein RB; Peli E; Bowers AR
Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2017 Sep; 6(5):11. PubMed ID: 29067219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Driving with hemianopia: III. Detection of stationary and approaching pedestrians in a simulator.
Alberti CF; Peli E; Bowers AR
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Jan; 55(1):368-74. PubMed ID: 24346175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Driving with hemianopia: IV. Head scanning and detection at intersections in a simulator.
Bowers AR; Ananyev E; Mandel AJ; Goldstein RB; Peli E
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Mar; 55(3):1540-8. PubMed ID: 24474265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gaze Scanning at Street Crossings by Pedestrians With Homonymous Hemianopia With and Without Hemispatial Neglect.
Pundlik S; Tomasi M; Houston KE; Kumar A; Shivshanker P; Bowers AR; Peli E; Luo G
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2023 Nov; 64(14):26. PubMed ID: 37975848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Auditory Reminder Cues to Promote Proactive Scanning on Approach to Intersections in Drivers With Homonymous Hemianopia: Driving With Hemianopia, IX.
Xu J; Emmermann B; Bowers AR
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2022 Jan; 140(1):75-78. PubMed ID: 34817569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Driving With Hemianopia X: Effects of Cross Traffic on Gaze Behaviors and Pedestrian Responses at Intersections.
Xu J; Baliutaviciute V; Swan G; Bowers AR
Front Hum Neurosci; 2022; 16():938140. PubMed ID: 35898933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Driving With Hemianopia VII: Predicting Hazard Detection With Gaze and Head Scan Magnitude.
Swan G; Savage SW; Zhang L; Bowers AR
Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2021 Jan; 10(1):20. PubMed ID: 33510959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Driving with hemianopia VIII: Effects of a vibro-tactile assistance system on safety and gaze behavior in pedestrian crossing situations.
Hölzl R; Steckhan L; Lehsing C; Savage SW; Bowers AR
Safety (Basel); 2021 Mar; 7(1):. PubMed ID: 34765674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Driving with Central Visual Field Loss II: How Scotomas above or below the Preferred Retinal Locus (PRL) Affect Hazard Detection in a Driving Simulator.
Bronstad PM; Albu A; Bowers AR; Goldstein R; Peli E
PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0136517. PubMed ID: 26332315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Driving With Hemianopia VI: Peripheral Prisms and Perceptual-Motor Training Improve Detection in a Driving Simulator.
Houston KE; Peli E; Goldstein RB; Bowers AR
Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2018 Jan; 7(1):5. PubMed ID: 29359111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Driving with hemianopia, I: Detection performance in a driving simulator.
Bowers AR; Mandel AJ; Goldstein RB; Peli E
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Nov; 50(11):5137-47. PubMed ID: 19608541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automatic processing of gaze movements to quantify gaze scanning behaviors in a driving simulator.
Swan G; Goldstein RB; Savage SW; Zhang L; Ahmadi A; Bowers AR
Behav Res Methods; 2021 Apr; 53(2):487-506. PubMed ID: 32748237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Opportunities and Limitations of a Gaze-Contingent Display to Simulate Visual Field Loss in Driving Simulator Studies.
Biebl B; Arcidiacono E; Kacianka S; Rieger JW; Bengler K
Front Neuroergon; 2022; 3():916169. PubMed ID: 38235462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of Perceptual-motor Training on Collision Judgments with Peripheral Prism Expanded Vision.
Houston KE; Peli E; Luo G; Bowers AR; Woods RL
Optom Vis Sci; 2022 Dec; 99(12):875-884. PubMed ID: 36594755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hazard Detection by Drivers with Paracentral Homonymous Field Loss: A Small Case Series.
Matthew BP; Bowers AR; Albu A; Goldstein RB; Peli E
J Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2011 Dec; 2011(Suppl 5):1. PubMed ID: 24501685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Driving with hemianopia, II: lane position and steering in a driving simulator.
Bowers AR; Mandel AJ; Goldstein RB; Peli E
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Dec; 51(12):6605-13. PubMed ID: 20671269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Driving with central field loss I: effect of central scotomas on responses to hazards.
Bronstad PM; Bowers AR; Albu A; Goldstein R; Peli E
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Mar; 131(3):303-9. PubMed ID: 23329309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of dual tasking on gaze behaviour and locomotor strategies adopted while circumventing virtual pedestrians during a collision avoidance task.
Bhojwani TM; Lynch SD; Bühler MA; Lamontagne A
Exp Brain Res; 2022 Oct; 240(10):2633-2645. PubMed ID: 35980438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of walking while using a smartphone on pedestrians' awareness of roadside events.
Lin MB; Huang YP
Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Apr; 101():87-96. PubMed ID: 28208099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A pilot evaluation of on-road detection performance by drivers with hemianopia using oblique peripheral prisms.
Bowers AR; Tant M; Peli E
Stroke Res Treat; 2012; 2012():176806. PubMed ID: 23316415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
