1328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29067426)
1. Effect of Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer: The ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial.
Jayne D; Pigazzi A; Marshall H; Croft J; Corrigan N; Copeland J; Quirke P; West N; Rautio T; Thomassen N; Tilney H; Gudgeon M; Bianchi PP; Edlin R; Hulme C; Brown J
JAMA; 2017 Oct; 318(16):1569-1580. PubMed ID: 29067426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exploring and adjusting for potential learning effects in ROLARR: a randomised controlled trial comparing robotic-assisted vs. standard laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer resection.
Corrigan N; Marshall H; Croft J; Copeland J; Jayne D; Brown J
Trials; 2018 Jun; 19(1):339. PubMed ID: 29945673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection on Pathological Outcomes in Rectal Cancer: The ALaCaRT Randomized Clinical Trial.
Stevenson AR; Solomon MJ; Lumley JW; Hewett P; Clouston AD; Gebski VJ; Davies L; Wilson K; Hague W; Simes J;
JAMA; 2015 Oct; 314(13):1356-63. PubMed ID: 26441180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection of Stage II or III Rectal Cancer on Pathologic Outcomes: The ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Clinical Trial.
Fleshman J; Branda M; Sargent DJ; Boller AM; George V; Abbas M; Peters WR; Maun D; Chang G; Herline A; Fichera A; Mutch M; Wexner S; Whiteford M; Marks J; Birnbaum E; Margolin D; Larson D; Marcello P; Posner M; Read T; Monson J; Wren SM; Pisters PW; Nelson H
JAMA; 2015 Oct; 314(13):1346-55. PubMed ID: 26441179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer (REAL): short-term outcomes of a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
Feng Q; Yuan W; Li T; Tang B; Jia B; Zhou Y; Zhang W; Zhao R; Zhang C; Cheng L; Zhang X; Liang F; He G; Wei Y; Xu J;
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Nov; 7(11):991-1004. PubMed ID: 36087608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.
Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM
Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Sphincter-Saving Surgery: Results of a Single-Center Series of 400 Consecutive Patients and Perspectives.
Rouanet P; Bertrand MM; Jarlier M; Mourregot A; Traore D; Taoum C; de Forges H; Colombo PE
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Nov; 25(12):3572-3579. PubMed ID: 30171509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of short-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic resection for mid- and distal rectal cancer.
Law WL; Foo DCC
Surg Endosc; 2017 Jul; 31(7):2798-2807. PubMed ID: 27785627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Efficacy comparison of robotic and laparoscopic radical surgery in the treatment of middle-low rectal cancer].
Zhang H; Yuan W; Zhou Q; Gu X; Wang F
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 May; 20(5):540-544. PubMed ID: 28534332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Abdominoperineal Resections in Patients With Rectal Cancer.
Moghadamyeghaneh Z; Phelan M; Smith BR; Stamos MJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Dec; 58(12):1123-9. PubMed ID: 26544808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases.
Barnajian M; Pettet D; Kazi E; Foppa C; Bergamaschi R
Colorectal Dis; 2014 Aug; 16(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 24750995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic rectal surgery in obese and morbidly obese patients: ACS-NSQIP analysis.
Albayati S; Hitos K; Berney CR; Morgan MJ; Pathma-Nathan N; El-Khoury T; Richardson A; Chu DI; Cannon J; Kennedy G; Toh JWT
J Robot Surg; 2023 Apr; 17(2):637-643. PubMed ID: 36269488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: current immediate clinical and oncological outcomes.
Araujo SE; Seid VE; Klajner S
World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Oct; 20(39):14359-70. PubMed ID: 25339823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Efficacy comparison between robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial].
Tang B; Gao GM; Zou Z; Liu DN; Tang C; Jiang QG; Lei X; Li TY
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):377-383. PubMed ID: 32306606
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A Comparison of Pathologic Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Resections for Rectal Cancer Using the ACS-NSQIP Proctectomy-Targeted Database: a Propensity Score Analysis.
Garfinkle R; Abou-Khalil M; Bhatnagar S; Wong-Chong N; Azoulay L; Morin N; Vasilevsky CA; Boutros M
J Gastrointest Surg; 2019 Feb; 23(2):348-356. PubMed ID: 30264386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic resection compared with laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcome.
Trastulli S; Farinella E; Cirocchi R; Cavaliere D; Avenia N; Sciannameo F; Gullà N; Noya G; Boselli C
Colorectal Dis; 2012 Apr; 14(4):e134-56. PubMed ID: 22151033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perioperative pain after robot-assisted versus laparoscopic rectal resection.
Tolstrup R; Funder JA; Lundbech L; Thomassen N; Iversen LH
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Mar; 33(3):285-289. PubMed ID: 29242972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of clinical and economic outcomes between robotic, laparoscopic, and open rectal cancer surgery: early experience at a tertiary care center.
Ramji KM; Cleghorn MC; Josse JM; MacNeill A; O'Brien C; Urbach D; Quereshy FA
Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1337-43. PubMed ID: 26173546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with partial preservation of Denonvilliers fascia: a comparative study of short-term efficacy and urinary and erectile function].
Huang ZK; Chi P; Huang Y
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Apr; 24(4):327-334. PubMed ID: 33878822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
