These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

794 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29067584)

  • 21. A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.
    Brown AM; Pucci MJ; Berger AC; Tatarian T; Evans NR; Rosato EL; Palazzo F
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 28643075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Could hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy improve the treatment results of esophageal cancer?
    Bjelovic M; Babic T; Spica B; Gunjic D; Veselinovic M; Trajkovic G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1196-201. PubMed ID: 27316602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Achieving R0.
    Darwish MB; Nagatomo K; Jackson T; Cho E; Osman H; Jeyarajah DR
    JSLS; 2020; 24(4):. PubMed ID: 33414613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cost-Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
    Liu CY; Lin CS; Shih CS; Huang YA; Liu CC; Cheng CT
    World J Surg; 2018 Aug; 42(8):2522-2529. PubMed ID: 29380008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis.
    Yerokun BA; Sun Z; Yang CJ; Gulack BC; Speicher PJ; Adam MA; D'Amico TA; Onaitis MW; Harpole DH; Berry MF; Hartwig MG
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Aug; 102(2):416-23. PubMed ID: 27157326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Long-term Survival After Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Nationwide Propensity-score Matched Analysis.
    Kalff MC; Fransen LFC; de Groot EM; Gisbertz SS; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Ruurda JP; Verhoeven RHA; Luyer MDP; van Hillegersberg R; van Berge Henegouwen MI;
    Ann Surg; 2022 Dec; 276(6):e749-e757. PubMed ID: 33378310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Nationwide analysis of short-term surgical outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy for malignancy.
    Thirunavukarasu P; Gabriel E; Attwood K; Kukar M; Hochwald SN; Nurkin SJ
    Int J Surg; 2016 Jan; 25():69-75. PubMed ID: 26602969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Long-term outcomes of 530 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
    Qi W; Zixiang W; Tianwei Z; Shuai F; Sai Z; Gang S; Ming W
    J Surg Oncol; 2018 Apr; 117(5):957-969. PubMed ID: 29878389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Transition from open to minimally invasive en bloc esophagectomy can be achieved without compromising surgical quality.
    Kammili A; Cools-Lartigue J; Mulder D; Feldman LS; Ferri LE; Mueller CL
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Jun; 35(6):3067-3076. PubMed ID: 32556773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Provides Better Short- and Long-Term Outcomes Than Open Esophagectomy in Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer.
    Terayama M; Okamura A; Kuriyama K; Takahashi N; Tamura M; Kanamori J; Imamura Y; Watanabe M
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2024 Sep; 31(9):5748-5756. PubMed ID: 38896227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Patterns of Recurrence and Long-Term Survival of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Versus Open Esophagectomy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: a Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
    Sugimura K; Miyata H; Kanemura T; Takeoka T; Sugase T; Masuzawa T; Katsuyama S; Motoori M; Takeda Y; Murata K; Yano M
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Jun; 27(6):1055-1065. PubMed ID: 36749557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Robot-assisted esophagectomy (RAE) versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial (RAMIE trial, robot-assisted minimally invasive Esophagectomy).
    Yang Y; Zhang X; Li B; Li Z; Sun Y; Mao T; Hua R; Yang Y; Guo X; He Y; Li H; Chen H; Tan L
    BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):608. PubMed ID: 31226960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. FA01.01: MINIMALLY INVASIVE APPROACH RESULTS IN BETTER OUTCOME COMPARED TO OPEN ESOPHAGECTOMY-A PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHED ANALYSIS.
    Kwan Kit Chan D; Siu Yin Chan F; King Hung Tong D; Yu Hong Wong I; Lai Yin Wong C; Ting Law T; Ying Kit Law S
    Dis Esophagus; 2018 Sep; 31(13):1. PubMed ID: 30219909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Thoracolaparoscopic vs Open McKeown's Esophagectomy.
    Wang K; Zhong J; Liu Q; Lin P; Fu J
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2022 Feb; 113(2):473-481. PubMed ID: 33621558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: an updated review.
    Watanabe M; Baba Y; Nagai Y; Baba H
    Surg Today; 2013 Mar; 43(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 22926551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Total minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma reduces postoperative pain and pneumonia compared to hybrid esophagectomy.
    Berlth F; Plum PS; Chon SH; Gutschow CA; Bollschweiler E; Hölscher AH
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Dec; 32(12):4957-4965. PubMed ID: 29931451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Versus Minimally Invasive Mckeown Esophagectomy.
    van Workum F; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; van den Wildenberg FJH; Polat F; Luyer MDP; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Rosman C
    Ann Surg; 2020 Jan; 271(1):128-133. PubMed ID: 30102633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy is safe and feasible for treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
    Ma S; Yan T; Liu D; Wang K; Wang J; Song J; Wang T; He W; Bai J; Jin L; Chen X
    Thorac Cancer; 2018 Feb; 9(2):310-315. PubMed ID: 29319236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Robot-assisted and conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy are associated with better postoperative results compared to hybrid and open transthoracic esophagectomy.
    van der Sluis PC; Babic B; Uzun E; Tagkalos E; Berlth F; Hadzijusufovic E; Lang H; Gockel I; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Apr; 48(4):776-782. PubMed ID: 34838394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Is Associated with Superior Survival Compared to Open Surgery.
    Ising MS; Smith SA; Trivedi JR; Martin RCG; Phillips P; Van Berkel V; Fox MP
    Am Surg; 2023 May; 89(5):1833-1843. PubMed ID: 35317621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 40.