156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29069561)
1. Mandating Coverage for Fertility Preservation - A Step in the Right Direction.
Cardozo ER; Huber WJ; Stuckey AR; Alvero RJ
N Engl J Med; 2017 Oct; 377(17):1607-1609. PubMed ID: 29069561
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Fertility Preservation Legislation in the United States: Potential Implications for Transgender Individuals.
Kyweluk MA; Reinecke J; Chen D
LGBT Health; 2019 Oct; 6(7):331-334. PubMed ID: 31436497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Call for Fertility Preservation Coverage for Breast Cancer Patients: The Cost of Consistency.
Walter JR; Xu S; Woodruff TK
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2017 May; 109(5):. PubMed ID: 28376233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The injustice of infertility insurance coverage: an examination of marital status restrictions under state law.
Cardinale JR
Albany Law Rev; 2012; 75(4):2133-49. PubMed ID: 22988598
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Unmet financial burden of infertility care and the impact of state insurance mandates in the United States: analysis from a popular crowdfunding platform.
Lai JD; Fantus RJ; Cohen AJ; Wan V; Hudnall MT; Pham M; Brannigan RE; Halpern JA
Fertil Steril; 2021 Oct; 116(4):1119-1125. PubMed ID: 34246467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Insurance mandates and trends in infertility treatments.
Henne MB; Bundorf MK
Fertil Steril; 2008 Jan; 89(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 17482603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Same-Sex Infertility Health Insurance Mandate in Maryland?
Adashi EY
JAMA; 2015 Jul; 314(1):15. PubMed ID: 26151251
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Delivering RomneyCare.
Diamond F
Manag Care; 2008 May; 17(5):46-9. PubMed ID: 18567469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. States may yet regret their many mandates.
Carroll J
Manag Care; 2011 Mar; 20(3):4-5. PubMed ID: 21485623
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Fertility-a human right worthy of mandated insurance coverage: the evolution, limitations, and future of access to care.
Kawwass JF; Penzias AS; Adashi EY
Fertil Steril; 2021 Jan; 115(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 33342534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assisted reproductive technologies and insurance under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.
Flanigan TD
Brandeis Law J; 2000; 38(4):777-816. PubMed ID: 12542016
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN THE “HAVE” AND THE “HAVE-NOTS”: THE ACA PROHIBITS INSURANCE COVERAGE DISCRIMINATION BASED UPON INFERTILITY STATUS.
Mastroianni MA
Albany Law Rev; 2016; 79(1):151-81. PubMed ID: 27071222
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Mandated benefits.
; Karberg J
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2012 Jan; ():1-20. PubMed ID: 22416296
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Mandated benefits. Issue brief.
Miller KG
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2010 Jan; ():1-28. PubMed ID: 20217929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Awaiting orders from the court.
Daly R
Mod Healthc; 2011 Mar; 41(12):42, 44. PubMed ID: 21516624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Mandated benefits. Issue brief.
Health Policy Tracking Service, A service of Thomson Reuters/West
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2011 Jan; ():1-27. PubMed ID: 21370540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Can the states nullify health care reform?
Jost TS
N Engl J Med; 2010 Mar; 362(10):869-71. PubMed ID: 20147705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Mandated benefits. Issue brief.
Karberg J
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2012 Dec; ():1-18. PubMed ID: 23297477
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The individual mandate. A rancorous moral matter.
Hamel R; Father Thomas Nairn
Health Prog; 2011; 92(4):88-96. PubMed ID: 21838121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Mandate delay could leave insurers without balance of sick, healthy subscribers.
Demko P
Mod Healthc; 2013 Nov; 43(44):9-10. PubMed ID: 24371958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
