These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29069965)
1. Twelve tips for developing an OSCE that measures what you want. Daniels VJ; Pugh D Med Teach; 2018 Dec; 40(12):1208-1213. PubMed ID: 29069965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using Kane's Validity Framework to Compare an Integrated and Single-Skill Objective Structured Clinical Examination. Lim A; Abeyaratne C; Reeve E; Desforges K; Malone D Am J Pharm Educ; 2024 Sep; 88(9):100756. PubMed ID: 39002863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Objectivity in subjectivity: do students' self and peer assessments correlate with examiners' subjective and objective assessment in clinical skills? A prospective study. Inayah AT; Anwer LA; Shareef MA; Nurhussen A; Alkabbani HM; Alzahrani AA; Obad AS; Zafar M; Afsar NA BMJ Open; 2017 May; 7(5):e012289. PubMed ID: 28487454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computer assisted Objective structured clinical examination versus Objective structured clinical examination in assessment of Dermatology undergraduate students. Chaudhary R; Grover C; Bhattacharya SN; Sharma A Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2017; 83(4):448-452. PubMed ID: 28540874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Applying Kane's validity framework to a simulation based assessment of clinical competence. Tavares W; Brydges R; Myre P; Prpic J; Turner L; Yelle R; Huiskamp M Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2018 May; 23(2):323-338. PubMed ID: 29079933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing musculoskeletal examination skills and diagnostic reasoning of 4th year medical students using a novel objective structured clinical exam. Stansfield RB; Diponio L; Craig C; Zeller J; Chadd E; Miller J; Monrad S BMC Med Educ; 2016 Oct; 16(1):268. PubMed ID: 27741946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of a Student-Driven, Virtual Patient Application on Objective Structured Clinical Examination Performance: Observational Study. Bergeron D; Champagne JN; Qi W; Dion M; Thériault J; Renaud JS J Med Internet Res; 2018 Feb; 20(2):e60. PubMed ID: 29472175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Five years after commencing the objective structured clinical examination: are we getting it right? Medical students' assessment as the measuring index. Okugbo SU; Agbonrofo P; Irowa O Afr Health Sci; 2020 Jun; 20(2):960-965. PubMed ID: 33163065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating the validity evidence of an OSCE: results from a new medical school. Yazbeck Karam V; Park YS; Tekian A; Youssef N BMC Med Educ; 2018 Dec; 18(1):313. PubMed ID: 30572876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Order effects in high stakes undergraduate examinations: an analysis of 5 years of administrative data in one UK medical school. Burt J; Abel G; Barclay M; Evans R; Benson J; Gurnell M BMJ Open; 2016 Oct; 6(10):e012541. PubMed ID: 27729351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) from the perspective of 3rd year's medical students - a pilot study. Skrzypek A; Szeliga M; Stalmach-Przygoda A; Górski S; Kowalska B; Kocurek A; Nowakowski M Folia Med Cracov; 2017; 57(3):67-75. PubMed ID: 29263456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Developing a video-based method to compare and adjust examiner effects in fully nested OSCEs. Yeates P; Cope N; Hawarden A; Bradshaw H; McCray G; Homer M Med Educ; 2019 Mar; 53(3):250-263. PubMed ID: 30575092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The objective structured clinical examination: can physician-examiners participate from a distance? Chan J; Humphrey-Murto S; Pugh DM; Su C; Wood T Med Educ; 2014 Apr; 48(4):441-50. PubMed ID: 24606627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing the generalizability of OSCE measures across content domains. Regehr G; Freeman R; Hodges B; Russell L Acad Med; 1999 Dec; 74(12):1320-2. PubMed ID: 10619010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comprehensive undergraduate medical assessments improve prediction of clinical performance. Wilkinson TJ; Frampton CM Med Educ; 2004 Oct; 38(10):1111-6. PubMed ID: 15461657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can training in musculoskeletal examination skills be effectively delivered by undergraduate students as part of the standard curriculum? Perry ME; Burke JM; Friel L; Field M Rheumatology (Oxford); 2010 Sep; 49(9):1756-61. PubMed ID: 20525742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. To the point: reviews in medical education--the Objective Structured Clinical Examination. Casey PM; Goepfert AR; Espey EL; Hammoud MM; Kaczmarczyk JM; Katz NT; Neutens JJ; Nuthalapaty FS; Peskin E; Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jan; 200(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 19121656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Developing doctors: what are the attitudes and perceptions of year 1 and 2 medical students towards a new integrated formative objective structured clinical examination? Furmedge DS; Smith LJ; Sturrock A BMC Med Educ; 2016 Jan; 16():32. PubMed ID: 26817693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implementing the objective structured clinical examination in a traditional medical school. Kowlowitz V; Hoole AJ; Sloane PD Acad Med; 1991 Jun; 66(6):345-7. PubMed ID: 2069655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Exploring the introduction of entrustment rating scales in an existing objective structured clinical examination. Holzhausen Y; Maaz A; März M; Sehy V; Peters H BMC Med Educ; 2019 Aug; 19(1):319. PubMed ID: 31438938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]