These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29070984)

  • 1. Added Value of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Combined with Digital Mammography According to Reader Agreement: Changes in BI-RADS Rate and Follow-Up Management.
    Galati F; Marzocca F; Bassetti E; Luciani ML; Tan S; Catalano C; Pediconi F
    Breast Care (Basel); 2017 Sep; 12(4):218-222. PubMed ID: 29070984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The added value of digital breast tomosynthesis in improving diagnostic performance of BI-RADS categorization of mammographically indeterminate breast lesions.
    Basha MAA; Safwat HK; Alaa Eldin AM; Dawoud HA; Hassanin AM
    Insights Imaging; 2020 Feb; 11(1):26. PubMed ID: 32060736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breast tomosynthesis for the clarification of mammographic BI-RADS 3 lesions can decrease follow-up examinations and enables immediate cancer diagnosis.
    Bahrs SD; Otto V; Hattermann V; Klumpp B; Hahn M; Nikolaou K; Siegmann-Luz K
    Acta Radiol; 2018 Oct; 59(10):1176-1183. PubMed ID: 29451022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. BI-RADS 3 on dense breast screening ultrasound after digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Dibble EH; Singer TM; Baird GL; Lourenco AP
    Clin Imaging; 2021 Dec; 80():315-321. PubMed ID: 34482242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characterization of Breast Masses in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammograms: An Observer Performance Study.
    Chan HP; Helvie MA; Hadjiiski L; Jeffries DO; Klein KA; Neal CH; Noroozian M; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Nov; 24(11):1372-1379. PubMed ID: 28647388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Impact of Adding Digital Breast Tomosynthesis to BI-RADS Categorization of Mammographically Equivocal Breast Lesions.
    Hassan RM; Almalki YE; Basha MAA; Alduraibi SK; Aboualkheir M; Almushayti ZA; Aldhilan AS; Aly SA; Alshamy AA
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Apr; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 37189524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. BI-RADS Category 3 Comparison: Probably Benign Category after Recall from Screening before and after Implementation of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    McDonald ES; McCarthy AM; Weinstein SP; Schnall MD; Conant EF
    Radiology; 2017 Dec; 285(3):778-787. PubMed ID: 28715278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast density (BD) assessment with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): Agreement between Quantra™ and 5th edition BI-RADS
    Ekpo EU; Mello-Thoms C; Rickard M; Brennan PC; McEntee MF
    Breast; 2016 Dec; 30():185-190. PubMed ID: 27769015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes in the Utilization of the BI-RADS Category 3 Assessment in Recalled Patients Before and After the Implementation of Screening Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Stepanek T; Constantinou N; Marshall H; Pham R; Thompson C; Dubchuk C; Plecha D
    Acad Radiol; 2019 Nov; 26(11):1515-1525. PubMed ID: 30665715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Value of contrast-enhanced mammography combined with the Kaiser score for clinical decision-making regarding tomosynthesis BI-RADS 4A lesions.
    Rong X; Kang Y; Xue J; Han P; Li Z; Yang G; Shi G
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7439-7447. PubMed ID: 35639141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of synthetic and digital mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis or alone for the detection and classification of microcalcifications.
    Choi JS; Han BK; Ko EY; Kim GR; Ko ES; Park KW
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Jan; 29(1):319-329. PubMed ID: 29931560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact on the recall rate of digital breast tomosynthesis as an adjunct to digital mammography in the screening setting. A double reading experience and review of the literature.
    Carbonaro LA; Di Leo G; Clauser P; Trimboli RM; Verardi N; Fedeli MP; Girometti R; Tafà A; Bruscoli P; Saguatti G; Bazzocchi M; Sardanelli F
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):808-14. PubMed ID: 26971428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Synthetic 2-Dimensional Mammography Can Replace Digital Mammography as an Adjunct to Wide-Angle Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Clauser P; Baltzer PAT; Kapetas P; Woitek R; Weber M; Leone F; Bernathova M; Helbich TH
    Invest Radiol; 2019 Feb; 54(2):83-88. PubMed ID: 30281557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of the addition of tomosynthesis to digital mammography on reader recall rate and reader confidence in the UK prevalent screening round.
    Upadhyay N; Soneji N; Stewart V; Ralleigh G
    Clin Radiol; 2018 Aug; 73(8):744-749. PubMed ID: 29724433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Benefit of digital breast tomosynthesis in symptomatic young women (≤30 years) diagnosed with BI-RADS category 4 or 5 on ultrasound.
    Huang JL; Lin Q
    Clin Radiol; 2022 Jan; 77(1):e55-e63. PubMed ID: 34763818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital breast tomosynthesis plus mammography, magnetic resonance imaging plus mammography and mammography alone: A comparison of diagnostic performance in symptomatic women.
    Tang W; Hu FX; Zhu H; Wang QF; Gu YJ; Peng WJ
    Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2017; 66(2):105-116. PubMed ID: 28211806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital breast tomosynthesis as an adjunct to digital mammography for detecting and characterising invasive lobular cancers: a multi-reader study.
    Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Zuiani C; Martincich L; Londero V; Caramia E; Clauser P; Campanino PP; Regini E; Luparia A; Castellano I; Bergamasco L; Sapino A; Fonio P; Bazzocchi M; Gandini G
    Clin Radiol; 2016 Sep; 71(9):889-95. PubMed ID: 27210245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contrast Enhanced Digital Mammography (CEDM) Helps to Safely Reduce Benign Breast Biopsies for Low to Moderately Suspicious Soft Tissue Lesions.
    Zuley ML; Bandos AI; Abrams GS; Ganott MA; Gizienski TA; Hakim CM; Kelly AE; Nair BE; Sumkin JH; Waheed U; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2020 Jul; 27(7):969-976. PubMed ID: 31495761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.