These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29071709)

  • 1. The evolution of costly mate choice against segregation distorters.
    Manser A; Lindholm AK; Weissing FJ
    Evolution; 2017 Dec; 71(12):2817-2828. PubMed ID: 29071709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evolution of mate choice for genome-wide heterozygosity.
    Fromhage L; Kokko H; Reid JM
    Evolution; 2009 Mar; 63(3):684-94. PubMed ID: 19220455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mate choice for genetic quality when environments vary: suggestions for empirical progress.
    Bussière LF; Hunt J; Stölting KN; Jennions MD; Brooks R
    Genetica; 2008 Sep; 134(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 17987390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nongenetic inheritance and the evolution of costly female preference.
    Bonduriansky R; Day T
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Jan; 26(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 23163399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evolution of female choice under intralocus sexual conflict and genotype-by-environment interactions.
    Li XY; Holman L
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2018 Oct; 373(1757):. PubMed ID: 30150223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Artificial selection reveals sex differences in the genetic basis of sexual attractiveness.
    Gosden TP; Reddiex AJ; Chenoweth SF
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 May; 115(21):5498-5503. PubMed ID: 29735676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evolution of segregation distortion: potential for a high degree of polymorphism.
    van Boven M; Weissing FJ
    J Theor Biol; 1998 May; 192(2):131-42. PubMed ID: 9637055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mate choice for non-additive genetic benefits: a resolution to the lek paradox.
    Neff BD; Pitcher TE
    J Theor Biol; 2008 Sep; 254(1):147-55. PubMed ID: 18589454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Coevolution of costly mate choice and condition-dependent display of good genes.
    Houle D; Kondrashov AS
    Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Jan; 269(1486):97-104. PubMed ID: 11788042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Male mate choice, male quality, and the potential for sexual selection on female traits under polygyny.
    Fitzpatrick CL; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2017 Jan; 71(1):174-183. PubMed ID: 27804119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mate-choice copying: A fitness-enhancing behavior that evolves by indirect selection.
    Santos M; Sapage M; Matos M; Varela SAM
    Evolution; 2017 Jun; 71(6):1456-1464. PubMed ID: 28334416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A potential resolution to the lek paradox through indirect genetic effects.
    Miller CW; Moore AJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2007 May; 274(1615):1279-86. PubMed ID: 17341455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Segregation distortion and the evolution of sex-determining mechanisms.
    Kozielska M; Weissing FJ; Beukeboom LW; Pen I
    Heredity (Edinb); 2010 Jan; 104(1):100-12. PubMed ID: 19672280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fitness consequences of the selfish supergene Segregation Distorter.
    Wong HWS; Holman L
    J Evol Biol; 2020 Jan; 33(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 31605400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The evolution of female mate choice by sexual conflict.
    Gavrilets S; Arnqvist G; Friberg U
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Mar; 268(1466):531-9. PubMed ID: 11296866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes.
    Neff BD; Pitcher TE
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Jan; 14(1):19-38. PubMed ID: 15643948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The evolution of mate choice in a fluctuating environment.
    Charlesworth B
    J Theor Biol; 1988 Jan; 130(2):191-204. PubMed ID: 3419180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Female mate preferences in Drosophila simulans: evolution and costs.
    Sharma MD; Tregenza T; Hosken DJ
    J Evol Biol; 2010 Aug; 23(8):1672-9. PubMed ID: 20546089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Veiled preferences and cryptic female choice could underlie the origin of novel sexual traits.
    Moehring AJ; Boughman JW
    Biol Lett; 2019 Feb; 15(2):20180878. PubMed ID: 30958124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Glucocorticoids, male sexual signals, and mate choice by females: Implications for sexual selection.
    Leary CJ; Baugh AT
    Gen Comp Endocrinol; 2020 Mar; 288():113354. PubMed ID: 31830474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.