These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29071709)

  • 21. The effects of sexual selection on trait divergence in a peripheral population with gene flow.
    Servedio MR; Bürger R
    Evolution; 2015 Oct; 69(10):2648-61. PubMed ID: 26332694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The costs of choice in sexual selection.
    Pomiankowski A
    J Theor Biol; 1987 Sep; 128(2):195-218. PubMed ID: 3431135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. On the resolution of the lek paradox.
    Kotiaho JS; LeBas NR; Puurtinen M; Tomkins JL
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2008 Jan; 23(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 18077055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mate choice evolution, dominance effects, and the maintenance of genetic variation.
    Lehmann L; Keller LF; Kokko H
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Jan; 244(2):282-95. PubMed ID: 16979189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Fisher process of sexual selection with the coevolution of preference strength.
    Xu K; Lerch BA; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2023 Apr; 77(4):1043-1055. PubMed ID: 36757067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Gentlemen prefer blondes: the evolution of mate preference among strategically allocated males.
    Rowell JT; Servedio MR
    Am Nat; 2009 Jan; 173(1):12-25. PubMed ID: 19063659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Secondary sexual ornamentation and non-additive genetic benefits of female mate choice.
    Reid JM
    Proc Biol Sci; 2007 Jun; 274(1616):1395-402. PubMed ID: 17374595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Maternal inheritance, epigenetics and the evolution of polyandry.
    Zeh JA; Zeh DW
    Genetica; 2008 Sep; 134(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 17705058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Direct fitness benefits explain mate preference, but not choice, for similarity in heterozygosity levels.
    Zandberg L; Gort G; van Oers K; Hinde CA
    Ecol Lett; 2017 Oct; 20(10):1306-1314. PubMed ID: 28868784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The evolution of mating preferences for genetic attractiveness and quality in the presence of sensory bias.
    Henshaw JM; Fromhage L; Jones AG
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Aug; 119(33):e2206262119. PubMed ID: 35939704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Selection for costly sexual traits results in a vacant mating niche and male dimorphism.
    Hendrickx F; Vanthournout B; Taborsky M
    Evolution; 2015 Aug; 69(8):2105-17. PubMed ID: 26179673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reinforcement of mate preference among hybridizing Heliconius butterflies.
    Kronforst MR; Young LG; Gilbert LE
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Jan; 20(1):278-85. PubMed ID: 17210020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evolution of Inbreeding Avoidance and Inbreeding Preference through Mate Choice among Interacting Relatives.
    Duthie AB; Reid JM
    Am Nat; 2016 Dec; 188(6):651-667. PubMed ID: 27860505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mate-sampling costs and sexy sons.
    Kokko H; Booksmythe I; Jennions MD
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Jan; 28(1):259-66. PubMed ID: 25399634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Within-population variation in female mating preference affects the opportunity for sexual selection and the evolution of male traits, but things are not as simple as expected.
    Millan CH; Machado G; Muniz DG
    J Evol Biol; 2020 Nov; 33(11):1579-1592. PubMed ID: 32871625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Density-dependent selection on mate search and evolution of Allee effects.
    Berec L; Kramer AM; Bernhauerová V; Drake JM
    J Anim Ecol; 2018 Jan; 87(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 28240356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Temperature coupling of mate attraction signals and female mate preferences in four populations of Enchenopa treehopper (Hemiptera: Membracidae).
    Jocson DMI; Smeester ME; Leith NT; Macchiano A; Fowler-Finn KD
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Oct; 32(10):1046-1056. PubMed ID: 31278803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evolution at the mouse t complex: why is the t haplotype preserved as an integral unit?
    van Boven M; Weissing FJ
    Evolution; 2000 Oct; 54(5):1795-808. PubMed ID: 11108606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Towards a resolution of the lek paradox.
    Kotiaho JS; Simmons LW; Tomkins JL
    Nature; 2001 Apr; 410(6829):684-6. PubMed ID: 11287953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Male versus female mate choice: sexual selection and the evolution of species recognition via reinforcement.
    Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2007 Dec; 61(12):2772-89. PubMed ID: 17924955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.