These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29071736)

  • 1. Histopathological comparison of healing after maxillary sinus augmentation using xenograft mixed with autogenous bone versus allograft mixed with autogenous bone.
    Galindo-Moreno P; de Buitrago JG; Padial-Molina M; Fernández-Barbero JE; Ata-Ali J; O Valle F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Feb; 29(2):192-201. PubMed ID: 29071736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone vs. a bovine-derived xenograft - a 5-year retrospective study.
    Lutz R; Berger-Fink S; Stockmann P; Neukam FW; Schlegel KA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Jun; 26(6):644-8. PubMed ID: 25906198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A prospective controlled trial comparing xenograft/autogenous bone and collagen-stabilized xenograft for maxillary sinus augmentation-Complications, patient-reported outcomes and volumetric analysis.
    Alayan J; Ivanovski S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Feb; 29(2):248-262. PubMed ID: 29231263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation comparing bovine versus porcine bone xenografts mixed with autogenous bone graft. A split-mouth randomized controlled trial.
    Galindo-Moreno P; Abril-García D; Carrillo-Galvez AB; Zurita F; Martín-Morales N; O'Valle F; Padial-Molina M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 May; 33(5):524-536. PubMed ID: 35224778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Volumetric changes after sinus augmentation using blocks of autogenous iliac bone or freeze-dried allogeneic bone. A non-randomized study.
    Sbordone C; Toti P; Guidetti F; Califano L; Pannone G; Sbordone L
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Mar; 42(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 23726762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical and histologic comparison of two different composite grafts for sinus augmentation: a pilot clinical trial.
    Galindo-Moreno P; Avila G; Fernández-Barbero JE; Mesa F; O'Valle-Ravassa F; Wang HL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Aug; 19(8):755-9. PubMed ID: 18573123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Apical and marginal bone alterations around implants in maxillary sinus augmentation grafted with autogenous bone or bovine bone material and simultaneous or delayed dental implant positioning.
    Sbordone L; Levin L; Guidetti F; Sbordone C; Glikman A; Schwartz-Arad D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 May; 22(5):485-91. PubMed ID: 21087315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dimensional Changes Following Lateral Wall Sinus Augmentation Without Concomitant Implant Placement Using a Composite Bone Graft.
    Machtei EE; Rozitky D; Zigdon-Giladi H; Horwitz J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 26800165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reimplantation of cultivated human bone cells from the posterior maxilla for sinus floor augmentation. Histological results from a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Hermund NU; Stavropoulos A; Donatsky O; Nielsen H; Clausen C; Reibel J; Pakkenberg B; Holmstrup P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Sep; 23(9):1031-7. PubMed ID: 22092973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Histomorphometrical Assessment of Sinus Augmentation Using Allograft (Particles or Block) and Simultaneous Implant Placement.
    Chaushu L; Chaushu G; Kolerman R; Vered M; Naishlos S; Nissan J
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jun; 10(1):9046. PubMed ID: 32493960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Algae-derived hydroxyapatite behavior as bone biomaterial in comparison with anorganic bovine bone: A split-mouth clinical, radiological, and histologic randomized study in humans.
    Galindo-Moreno P; Padial-Molina M; Lopez-Chaichio L; Gutiérrez-Garrido L; Martín-Morales N; O'Valle F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Jun; 31(6):536-548. PubMed ID: 32072685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation surgery with autogenous bone grafts as ceiling: a pilot study and test of principle.
    Raghoebar GM; Meijer HJ; Telleman G; Vissink A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Aug; 15(4):550-7. PubMed ID: 22171568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anorganic bovine bone (ABB) vs. autologous bone (AB) plus ABB in maxillary sinus grafting. A prospective non-randomized clinical and histomorphometrical trial.
    Schmitt CM; Moest T; Lutz R; Neukam FW; Schlegel KA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Sep; 26(9):1043-50. PubMed ID: 24730602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maxillary Sinus Grafting with Autograft Versus Fresh-Frozen Allograft: A Split-Mouth Evaluation of Bone Volume Dynamics.
    Xavier SP; Silva ER; Kahn A; Chaushu L; Chaushu G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(5):1137-42. PubMed ID: 26394351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Histomorphometric comparison of maxillary pristine bone and composite bone graft biopsies obtained after sinus augmentation.
    Galindo-Moreno P; Moreno-Riestra I; Avila G; Fernández-Barbero JE; Mesa F; Aguilar M; Wang HL; O'Valle F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jan; 21(1):122-8. PubMed ID: 19845707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Grafting after sinus lift with anorganic bovine bone alone compared with 50:50 anorganic bovine bone and autologous bone: results of a pilot randomised trial at one year.
    Meloni SM; Jovanovic SA; Lolli FM; Cassisa C; De Riu G; Pisano M; Lumbau A; Lugliè PF; Tullio A
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 May; 53(5):436-41. PubMed ID: 25796408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scintigraphic, histologic, and histomorphometric analyses of bovine bone mineral and autogenous bone mixture in sinus floor augmentation: a randomized controlled trial--results after 4 months of healing.
    Pikdöken L; Gürbüzer B; Küçükodacı Z; Urhan M; Barış E; Tezulaş E
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 69(1):160-9. PubMed ID: 21050644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term changes in graft height after maxillary sinus augmentation, onlay bone grafting, and combination of both techniques: a long-term retrospective cohort study.
    Schmitt C; Karasholi T; Lutz R; Wiltfang J; Neukam FW; Schlegel KA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Feb; 25(2):e38-46. PubMed ID: 23075057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A clinical long-term radiographic evaluation of graft height changes after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with a 2:1 autogenous bone/xenograft mixture and simultaneous placement of dental implants.
    Hatano N; Shimizu Y; Ooya K
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Jun; 15(3):339-45. PubMed ID: 15142097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A clinical and histologic evaluation of implant integration in the posterior maxilla after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone, bovine hydroxyapatite, or a 20:80 mixture.
    Hallman M; Sennerby L; Lundgren S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):635-43. PubMed ID: 12381063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.