BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29072144)

  • 1. A new method for enhancer prediction based on deep belief network.
    Bu H; Gan Y; Wang Y; Zhou S; Guan J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Oct; 18(Suppl 12):418. PubMed ID: 29072144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Opening up the blackbox: an interpretable deep neural network-based classifier for cell-type specific enhancer predictions.
    Kim SG; Theera-Ampornpunt N; Fang CH; Harwani M; Grama A; Chaterji S
    BMC Syst Biol; 2016 Aug; 10 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):54. PubMed ID: 27490187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enhancer prediction with histone modification marks using a hybrid neural network model.
    Lim A; Lim S; Kim S
    Methods; 2019 Aug; 166():48-56. PubMed ID: 30905748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comprehensive revisit of the machine-learning tools developed for the identification of enhancers in the human genome.
    Phan LT; Oh C; He T; Manavalan B
    Proteomics; 2023 Jul; 23(13-14):e2200409. PubMed ID: 37021401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sequence based prediction of enhancer regions from DNA random walk.
    Singh AP; Mishra S; Jabin S
    Sci Rep; 2018 Oct; 8(1):15912. PubMed ID: 30374023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computational Approaches for Mining GRO-Seq Data to Identify and Characterize Active Enhancers.
    Nagari A; Murakami S; Malladi VS; Kraus WL
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1468():121-38. PubMed ID: 27662874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. HEAP: a task adaptive-based explainable deep learning framework for enhancer activity prediction.
    Liu Y; Wang Z; Yuan H; Zhu G; Zhang Y
    Brief Bioinform; 2023 Sep; 24(5):. PubMed ID: 37539835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. RicENN: Prediction of Rice Enhancers with Neural Network Based on DNA Sequences.
    Gao Y; Chen Y; Feng H; Zhang Y; Yue Z
    Interdiscip Sci; 2022 Jun; 14(2):555-565. PubMed ID: 35190950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Integrative machine learning framework for the identification of cell-specific enhancers from the human genome.
    Basith S; Hasan MM; Lee G; Wei L; Manavalan B
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 Nov; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 34226917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computational schemes for the prediction and annotation of enhancers from epigenomic assays.
    Whitaker JW; Nguyen TT; Zhu Y; Wildberg A; Wang W
    Methods; 2015 Jan; 72():86-94. PubMed ID: 25461775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving Enhancer Identification with a Multi-Classifier Stacked Ensemble Model.
    Mir BA; Rehman MU; Tayara H; Chong KT
    J Mol Biol; 2023 Dec; 435(23):168314. PubMed ID: 37852600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improved regulatory element prediction based on tissue-specific local epigenomic signatures.
    He Y; Gorkin DU; Dickel DE; Nery JR; Castanon RG; Lee AY; Shen Y; Visel A; Pennacchio LA; Ren B; Ecker JR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Feb; 114(9):E1633-E1640. PubMed ID: 28193886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. RFECS: a random-forest based algorithm for enhancer identification from chromatin state.
    Rajagopal N; Xie W; Li Y; Wagner U; Wang W; Stamatoyannopoulos J; Ernst J; Kellis M; Ren B
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2013; 9(3):e1002968. PubMed ID: 23526891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Active enhancer positions can be accurately predicted from chromatin marks and collective sequence motif data.
    Podsiadło A; Wrzesień M; Paja W; Rudnicki W; Wilczyński B
    BMC Syst Biol; 2013; 7 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S16. PubMed ID: 24565409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. DEEP: a general computational framework for predicting enhancers.
    Kleftogiannis D; Kalnis P; Bajic VB
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2015 Jan; 43(1):e6. PubMed ID: 25378307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting enhancers with deep convolutional neural networks.
    Min X; Zeng W; Chen S; Chen N; Chen T; Jiang R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Dec; 18(Suppl 13):478. PubMed ID: 29219068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction of promoters and enhancers using multiple DNA methylation-associated features.
    Hwang W; Oliver VF; Merbs SL; Zhu H; Qian J
    BMC Genomics; 2015; 16 Suppl 7(Suppl 7):S11. PubMed ID: 26099324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Novel Position-Specific Encoding Algorithm (SeqPose) of Nucleotide Sequences and Its Application for Detecting Enhancers.
    Mu X; Wang Y; Duan M; Liu S; Li F; Wang X; Zhang K; Huang L; Zhou F
    Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Mar; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 33802922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. DELTA: A Distal Enhancer Locating Tool Based on AdaBoost Algorithm and Shape Features of Chromatin Modifications.
    Lu Y; Qu W; Shan G; Zhang C
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0130622. PubMed ID: 26091399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. EAGLE: An algorithm that utilizes a small number of genomic features to predict tissue/cell type-specific enhancer-gene interactions.
    Gao T; Qian J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Oct; 15(10):e1007436. PubMed ID: 31665135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.