BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29072220)

  • 1. Microbial assessment of dental unit waterlines in an institutional setup in Karnataka, South India.
    Rodrigues S; Suvarna S; Suvarna J; Saralaya V; Saldanha S; Shenoy VK
    Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(5):555-559. PubMed ID: 29072220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dental unit waterlines: biofilms, disinfection and recurrence.
    Meiller TF; Depaola LG; Kelley JI; Baqui AA; Turng BF; Falkler WA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Jan; 130(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 9919033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electron microscopic examination of dental unit waterlines biofilm.
    Szymańska J
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 2005; 12(2):295-8. PubMed ID: 16457488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Formation and decontamination of biofilms in dental unit waterlines.
    Wirthlin MR; Marshall GW; Rowland RW
    J Periodontol; 2003 Nov; 74(11):1595-609. PubMed ID: 14682656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microbial contamination of dental unit waterlines.
    Szymańska J; Sitkowska J; Dutkiewicz J
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 2008; 15(2):173-9. PubMed ID: 19061251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dental unit waterline contamination: a review of research and findings from a clinic setting.
    Wirthlin MR; Roth M
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2015 Mar; 36(3):216-9. PubMed ID: 25822748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do contaminated dental unit waterlines pose a risk of infection?
    Pankhurst CL; Coulter WA
    J Dent; 2007 Sep; 35(9):712-20. PubMed ID: 17689168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microbial contamination of dental unit waterlines: short- and long-term effects of flushing.
    Santiago JI; Huntington MK; Johnston AM; Quinn RS; Williams JF
    Gen Dent; 1994; 42(6):528-35. PubMed ID: 23087981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Management of dental unit waterline biofilms in the 21st century.
    O'Donnell MJ; Boyle MA; Russell RJ; Coleman DC
    Future Microbiol; 2011 Oct; 6(10):1209-26. PubMed ID: 22004039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison between Two Types of Dental Unit Waterlines: How Evaluation of Microbiological Contamination Can Support Risk Containment.
    Lizzadro J; Mazzotta M; Girolamini L; Dormi A; Pellati T; Cristino S
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jan; 16(3):. PubMed ID: 30682855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Waterline biofilm and the dental treatment facility: a review.
    Pederson ED; Stone ME; Ragain JC; Simecek JW
    Gen Dent; 2002; 50(2):190-5; quiz 196-7. PubMed ID: 12004714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dental unit waterline contamination and its possible implications during periodontal surgery.
    Putnins EE; Di Giovanni D; Bhullar AS
    J Periodontol; 2001 Mar; 72(3):393-400. PubMed ID: 11327068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High throughput sequencing-based analysis of microbial diversity in dental unit waterlines supports the importance of providing safe water for clinical use.
    Zhang Y; Ping Y; Zhou R; Wang J; Zhang G
    J Infect Public Health; 2018; 11(3):357-363. PubMed ID: 28988812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microbial contamination in dental unit waterlines.
    Souza-Gugelmin MC; Lima CD; Lima SN; Mian H; Ito IY
    Braz Dent J; 2003; 14(1):55-7. PubMed ID: 12656466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Establishing a laboratory model of dental unit waterlines bacterial biofilms using a CDC biofilm reactor.
    Yoon HY; Lee SY
    Biofouling; 2017 Nov; 33(10):917-926. PubMed ID: 29160100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dental Unit Waterlines in Quito and Caracas Contaminated with Nontuberculous Mycobacteria: A Potential Health Risk in Dental Practice.
    Castellano Realpe OJ; Gutiérrez JC; Sierra DA; Pazmiño Martínez LA; Prado Palacios YY; Echeverría G; de Waard JH
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Mar; 17(7):. PubMed ID: 32244267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inhibitory effect of PVDF tubes on biofilm formation in dental unit waterlines.
    Yabune T; Imazato S; Ebisu S
    Dent Mater; 2005 Aug; 21(8):780-6. PubMed ID: 16026668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of acoustic waves in preventing Streptococcus mutans adhesion on dental unit water line.
    Pantanella F; Schippa S; Solimini A; Rosa L; Bettucci A; Berlutti F
    Ann Ig; 2019; 31(2):109-116. PubMed ID: 30714608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reducing bacterial counts in dental unit waterlines: distilled water vs. antimicrobial agents.
    Kettering JD; Muñoz-Viveros CA; Stephens JA; Naylor WP; Zhang W
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2002 Oct; 30(10):735-41. PubMed ID: 12403476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biofilm and dental unit waterlines.
    Szymanska J
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 2003; 10(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 14677905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.